Literature DB >> 25872693

Does Routine Pathology Analysis of Adult Circumcision Tissue Identify Penile Cancer?

Viral S Shah1, Nathan L Jung1, Daniel K Lee1, Kenneth G Nepple1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of foreskin pathology analysis, we evaluated the outcomes and the costs of this practice in patients for whom penile cancer was not suspected. Adult circumcision specimens are routinely sent for pathologic analysis even when penile cancer is not suspected, increasing costs with little benefit.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult patients who underwent circumcision between January 2000 and August 2013 at a single institution were evaluated by retrospective chart review. Cases of suspected penile cancer (n = 6) were excluded. We identified cases where foreskin specimens were sent for pathologic analysis and reviewed pathology reports. Our Department of Pathology estimated the cost for evaluation of specimens at $311 per case.
RESULTS: A total of 147 circumcisions were performed in patients with no suspicious findings. Pathologic analysis was obtained in 69% (101 of 147) of the cases. Inflammation (58%) was the most common finding. One unsuspected instance of squamous cell carcinoma (Tis) was identified in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus (1 of 147 = 0.7%). The overall cost of pathologic analysis in this study was $31,411.
CONCLUSION: In individuals without predisposing immunodeficiency and where cancer was not suspected, we found that pathologic analysis of circumcision specimens identified no additional malignancies. Our data suggest that in this normal risk population, pathologic analysis may not be required. Additionally, forgoing pathology on foreskin specimens in lower risk cases may reduce costs to the health care system.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25872693      PMCID: PMC5018204          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Addressing rising health care costs--a view from the Congressional Budget Office.

Authors:  Peter R Orszag; Philip Ellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis--population-based case-control study in Denmark.

Authors:  Birgitte Schütt Madsen; Adriaan J C van den Brule; Helle Lone Jensen; Jan Wohlfahrt; Morten Frisch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Costing adult male circumcision in high HIV prevalence, low circumcision rate countries.

Authors:  John Vincent Fieno
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2008-05

4.  Routine pathology evaluation of hydrocele and spermatocele specimens is associated with significant costs and no identifiable benefit.

Authors:  Viral S Shah; Kenneth G Nepple; Daniel K Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  An argument for circumcision. Prevention of balanitis in the adult.

Authors:  N Fakjian; S Hunter; G W Cole; J Miller
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1990-08

6.  Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease.

Authors:  Janet R Daling; Margaret M Madeleine; Lisa G Johnson; Stephen M Schwartz; Katherine A Shera; Michelle A Wurscher; Joseph J Carter; Peggy L Porter; Denise A Galloway; James K McDougall; John N Krieger
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Trends in cancer risk among people with AIDS in the United States 1980-2002.

Authors:  Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; James J Goedert; Phillip Virgo; Timothy S McNeel; Steven M Scoppa; Robert J Biggar
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 8.  Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stefan A Bailis; Thomas E Wiswell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Male circumcision and penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha L Larke; Sara L Thomas; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Helen A Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Penile cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention.

Authors:  M C G Bleeker; D A M Heideman; P J F Snijders; S Horenblas; J Dillner; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence and sequelae of penile lichen sclerosus in males presenting for circumcision in regional Australia: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Kwok; Nathan Shugg; Amila Siriwardana; Ross Calopedos; Katherine Richards; Sanjeev Bandi; John Hempenstall; Prem Rashid; Devang Desai
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-06

2.  Have been the incidence and consequences of penile lichen sclerosus still underestimated?

Authors:  Mateusz Czajkowski; Katarzyna Czajkowska; Małgorzata Sokołowska-Wojdyło; Marcin Matuszewski
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08

3.  The role of occlusion and micro-incontinence in the pathogenesis of penile lichen sclerosus: an observational study of pro-inflammatory cytokines' gene expression.

Authors:  M Czajkowski; P Wierzbicki; A Kotulak-Chrząszcz; K Czajkowska; M Bolcewicz; J Kłącz; K Kreft; A Lewandowska; B Nedoszytko; M Sokołowska-Wojdyło; Z Kmieć; L Kalinowski; R J Nowicki; M Matuszewski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.370

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.