Literature DB >> 25872692

Ventral Slit Scrotal Flap: A New Outpatient Surgical Option for Reconstruction of Adult Buried Penis Syndrome.

Mary E Westerman1, Timothy J Tausch1, Lee C Zhao1, Jordan A Siegel1, Nathan Starke1, Alexandra K Klein1, Allen F Morey2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We present a novel technique using ventral slit with scrotal skin flaps (VSSF) for the reconstruction of adult buried penis without skin grafting. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: An initial ventral slit is made in the phimotic ring, and the penis is exposed. To cover the defect in the ventral shaft skin, local flaps are created by making a ventral midline scrotal incision with horizontal relaxing incisions. The scrotal flaps are rotated to resurface the ventral shaft. Clinical data analyzed included preoperative diagnoses, length of stay, blood loss, and operative outcomes. Complications were also recorded. Fifteen consecutive patients with a penis trapped due to lichen sclerosus (LS) or phimosis underwent repair with VSSF. Each was treated in the outpatient setting with no perioperative complications. Mean age was 51 years (range, 26-75 years), and mean body mass index was 42.6 kg/m(2) (range, 29.8-53.9 kg/m(2)). The majority of patients (13 of 15, 87%) had a pathologic diagnosis of LS. Mean estimated blood loss was 57 cc (range, 25-200 cc), mean operative time was 83 minutes (range, 35-145 minutes), and all patients were discharged on the day of surgery. The majority of patients (11 of 15, 73.3%) remain satisfied with their results and have required no further intervention. Recurrences in 3 of 15 (20.0%) were due to LS, panniculus migration, and concealment by edematous groin tissue; 2 of these patients underwent subsequent successful skin grafting.
CONCLUSION: VSSF is a versatile, safe, and effective reconstructive option in appropriately selected patients with buried penis, which enables reconstruction of penile shaft skin defects without requiring complex skin grafting.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25872692     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Plastic surgery reconstruction of the adult buried penis : Option or obligation?]

Authors:  S Mühlstädt; P Anheuser; N Mohammed; A D Bach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Surgical Management of Adult Acquired Buried Penis.

Authors:  Thomas W Fuller; Katherine M Theisen; Anup Shah; Paul J Rusilko
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Longer length improvement and more covert incision: a single-center, prospective study of two innovative surgical methods "one stitch" and "four stitch" for pediatric buried penis.

Authors:  Junhao Lei; Chunhua Luo; Songtao Cheng; Wen Yan; Xinghuan Wang; Xinjun Su
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Buried penis repair: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Jacob Robert Stephen; Frank N Burks
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 5.  Evaluation and management of adult acquired buried penis.

Authors:  Tammy S Ho; Joel Gelman
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

6.  Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap: A case report of penile skin defects following circumcision.

Authors:  Qing-Guo Gao; Wenrui Qu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.

Authors:  Carlo Bettocchi; Andrea Alberto Checchia; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Anna Ricapito; Gian Maria Busetto; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.