Janine Stein1, Melanie Luppa1, Hans-Helmut König2, Steffi G Riedel-Heller1. 1. Institute of Social Medicine,Occupational Health and Public Health,Medical Faculty,University of Leipzig,Leipzig,Germany. 2. Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research,Hamburg Center for Health Economics,University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf,University of Hamburg,Hamburg,Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) was developed for the assessment of physical-, psychological-, and environment-related needs in the elderly. The aim of this study was to revise and adapt the German version of the CANE with regard to the content validity of the instrument. METHODS: Following a multistage approach, face-to-face interviews using the CANE, an expert survey and a multidisciplinary consensus conference were conducted in order to evaluate the frequency and relevance of met and unmet needs in the German elderly population, and to modify the content of the CANE for the German-speaking countries. RESULTS: In Germany, unmet physical needs including physical health, medication, eyesight/hearing/communication, mobility/falls, self-care, and continence were found to have top priority closely followed by social needs (company, intimate relationships, daytime activities, information, and abuse/neglect). Psychological needs were the lowest ranked care category. Experts' proposals for the improvement of the German version of the CANE were collected. All findings were discussed and integrated in the multidisciplinary consensus conference with the result of a revised and adapted CANE that is applicable in the German-speaking context. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of an adapted and improved German version of the CANE may substantially contribute to a comprehensive and valid assessment of needs in the elderly population. The results of this study represent an important basis for comprehensive needs assessment in the elderly in the theoretical and practical field of healthcare and health services research.
BACKGROUND: The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) was developed for the assessment of physical-, psychological-, and environment-related needs in the elderly. The aim of this study was to revise and adapt the German version of the CANE with regard to the content validity of the instrument. METHODS: Following a multistage approach, face-to-face interviews using the CANE, an expert survey and a multidisciplinary consensus conference were conducted in order to evaluate the frequency and relevance of met and unmet needs in the German elderly population, and to modify the content of the CANE for the German-speaking countries. RESULTS: In Germany, unmet physical needs including physical health, medication, eyesight/hearing/communication, mobility/falls, self-care, and continence were found to have top priority closely followed by social needs (company, intimate relationships, daytime activities, information, and abuse/neglect). Psychological needs were the lowest ranked care category. Experts' proposals for the improvement of the German version of the CANE were collected. All findings were discussed and integrated in the multidisciplinary consensus conference with the result of a revised and adapted CANE that is applicable in the German-speaking context. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of an adapted and improved German version of the CANE may substantially contribute to a comprehensive and valid assessment of needs in the elderly population. The results of this study represent an important basis for comprehensive needs assessment in the elderly in the theoretical and practical field of healthcare and health services research.
Keywords:
Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE); content validity; elderly population; health services research; needs assessment
Authors: Nikolas Dietzel; Elmar Graessel; Lara Kürten; Sebastian Meuer; Dorothee Klaas-Ickler; Markus Hladik; Christina Chmelirsch; Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: F Kracht; M Boekholt; F Schumacher-Schönert; A Nikelski; N Chikhradze; P Lücker; H C Vollmar; W Hoffmann; S H Kreisel; J R Thyrian Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 3.921