Literature DB >> 2587190

Shift in stimulus range and the exponent of the power function for loudness.

R Ahlström, J C Baird.   

Abstract

The exponent of the power function for loudness was tracked over the course of 60 trials with one stimulus range and compared to the exponent over the course of 60 subsequent trials with a different stimulus range. Three stimulus sets were used: (1) weak, a short range of relatively soft tones (45-55 dBA); (2) strong, a short range of relatively loud tones (64-74 dBA); and (3) complete, a longer range of soft to loud tones (40-90 dBA). All pairs of stimulus sets were tested, together with three control conditions in which no shift in range occurred. Ten subjects were run in each of the nine groups. For preshift trials, the mean exponent was lowest for the strong stimulus series, highest for the weak series, and at an intermediate value for the complete series. These differences were all significant. Following a shift in stimulus range, the weak series still yielded the highest exponent, but the exponents were not reliably different for the complete and strong series. Postshift exponents also depended significantly on the preshift range experienced by the subjects. These effects were not confined to the period immediately following the shift in range, but persisted for up to 60 trials.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2587190     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

2.  Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1973-03

3.  Analysis of contrast effects in loudness judgments.

Authors:  L E Melamed; W R Thurlow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

4.  Avector model for psychophysical judgment.

Authors:  J Ross; V Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

5.  A cognitive theory of psychophysics. II. Fechner's Law and Stevens' Law.

Authors:  J C Baird
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1970

Review 6.  Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Stimulus range, number of categories, and the "virtual" exponent.

Authors:  H J Foley; D V Cross; M A Foley; R Reeder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-12

8.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: a validation.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; D A Goodman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

9.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 17.737

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: a study of individual differences.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; B A Hughson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

2.  The range effect as a function of stimulus set, presence of a standard, and modulus.

Authors:  K H Kowal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

3.  On the difficulty to think in ratios: a methodological bias in Stevens' magnitude estimation procedure.

Authors:  Alica Mertens; Ulf K Mertens; Veronika Lerche
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.