Literature DB >> 25871450

Determination of Hydrogen Bond Structure in Water versus Aprotic Environments To Test the Relationship Between Length and Stability.

Paul A Sigala, Eliza A Ruben, Corey W Liu, Paula M B Piccoli1, Edward G Hohenstein, Todd J Martínez, Arthur J Schultz1, Daniel Herschlag.   

Abstract

Hydrogen bonds profoundly influence the architecture and activity of biological macromolecules. Deep appreciation of hydrogen bond contributions to biomolecular function thus requires a detailed understanding of hydrogen bond structure and energetics and the relationship between these properties. Hydrogen bond formation energies (ΔGf) are enormously more favorable in aprotic solvents than in water, and two classes of contributing factors have been proposed to explain this energetic difference, focusing respectively on the isolated and hydrogen-bonded species: (I) water stabilizes the dissociated donor and acceptor groups much better than aprotic solvents, thereby reducing the driving force for hydrogen bond formation; and (II) water lengthens hydrogen bonds compared to aprotic environments, thereby decreasing the potential energy within the hydrogen bond. Each model has been proposed to provide a dominant contribution to ΔGf, but incisive tests that distinguish the importance of these contributions are lacking. Here we directly test the structural basis of model II. Neutron crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and quantum mechanical calculations demonstrate that O-H···O hydrogen bonds in crystals, chloroform, acetone, and water have nearly identical lengths and very similar potential energy surfaces despite ΔGf differences >8 kcal/mol across these solvents. These results rule out a substantial contribution from solvent-dependent differences in hydrogen bond structure and potential energy after association (model II) and thus support the conclusion that differences in hydrogen bond ΔGf are predominantly determined by solvent interactions with the dissociated groups (model I). These findings advance our understanding of universal hydrogen-bonding interactions and have important implications for biology and engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25871450     DOI: 10.1021/ja512980h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  11 in total

1.  Mutation of the conserved Asp-Asp pair impairs the structure, function, and inhibition of CTX-M Class A β-lactamase.

Authors:  M Trent Kemp; Derek A Nichols; Xiujun Zhang; Kyle Defrees; Insung Na; Adam R Renslo; Yu Chen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Liquid-cell transmission electron microscopy for imaging of thermosensitive recombinant polymers.

Authors:  Kyle J Isaacson; Brian R Van Devener; Douglas B Steinhauff; M Martin Jensen; Joseph Cappello; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 11.467

3.  Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Agents: Quantum Chemistry and MRI.

Authors:  Jikun Li; Xinxin Feng; Wei Zhu; Nikita Oskolkov; Tianhui Zhou; Boo Kyung Kim; Noman Baig; Michael T McMahon; Eric Oldfield
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Ligand-Induced Proton Transfer and Low-Barrier Hydrogen Bond Revealed by X-ray Crystallography.

Authors:  Derek A Nichols; Jacqueline C Hargis; Ruslan Sanishvili; Priyadarshini Jaishankar; Kyle Defrees; Emmanuel W Smith; Kenneth K Wang; Fabio Prati; Adam R Renslo; H Lee Woodcock; Yu Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  Low barrier hydrogen bonds in protein structure and function.

Authors:  M Trent Kemp; Eric M Lewandowski; Yu Chen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Assessment of enzyme active site positioning and tests of catalytic mechanisms through X-ray-derived conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Filip Yabukarski; Justin T Biel; Margaux M Pinney; Tzanko Doukov; Alexander S Powers; James S Fraser; Daniel Herschlag
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  NMR and IR Investigations of Strong Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonds.

Authors:  Poul Erik Hansen; Jens Spanget-Larsen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Isotope Effects on Chemical Shifts in the Study of Hydrogen Bonds in Small Molecules.

Authors:  Poul Erik Hansen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  Helix-Capping Histidines: Diversity of N-H···N Hydrogen Bond Strength Revealed by (2h)JNN Scalar Couplings.

Authors:  Matthew R Preimesberger; Ananya Majumdar; Selena L Rice; Lauren Que; Juliette T J Lecomte
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Unraveling the structural and chemical features of biological short hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Shengmin Zhou; Lu Wang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.