Rosaiah Kotikalapudi1, Rajesh K Patel2. 1. Department of Animal Biotechnology, Sandor Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India. 2. Department of Animal Biotechnology, Sandor Animal Biogenics Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Abstract
Blood collection in heparin tubes for cytogenetic, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes for molecular genetics applications respectively, are routine practices everywhere. If blood samples are required for cytogenetics as well as DNA work, two samples from each animal are usually collected, which leads to wastage of time and money. The present study tried to explore the possibilities of collecting a single blood sample in a heparinised tube for use in both applications. Two blood samples were collected from the same animals; one in a heparin tube and the other in an EDTA tube. DNA was extracted and stored at the same temperature and for the same durations. Comparative studies revealed that the DNA samples extracted from blood using these two different coagulants give more or less the same quality of results especially for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based applications in cattle. The purpose of the present study was to establish the possibility of using heparin blood for chromosomal studies as well as for molecular biology. Such a practice will obviously save time and money in collecting samples in duplicate.
Blood collection in heparin tubes for cytogenetic, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes for molecular genetics applications respectively, are routine practices everywhere. If blood samples are required for cytogenetics as well as DNA work, two samples from each animal are usually collected, which leads to wastage of time and money. The present study tried to explore the possibilities of collecting a single blood sample in a heparinised tube for use in both applications. Two blood samples were collected from the same animals; one in a heparin tube and the other in an EDTA tube. DNA was extracted and stored at the same temperature and for the same durations. Comparative studies revealed that the DNA samples extracted from blood using these two different coagulants give more or less the same quality of results especially for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based applications in cattle. The purpose of the present study was to establish the possibility of using heparin blood for chromosomal studies as well as for molecular biology. Such a practice will obviously save time and money in collecting samples in duplicate.
Long term storage of DNA samples is required to
create a genomic DNA bank for cattle and to minimize
the future cost of research. Successful long term
storage depends on the stability of the DNA samples
which in turn depends on storage conditions. DNA is
an inherently stable molecule frequently used in molecular
research. Research scientists utilizing blood in
their studies have unique needs depending on their
downstream applications. Blood can be collected using
different anticoagulants including citrate, ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA) or heparin. The
type of anticoagulant used in blood collection can affect
the results from blood DNA isolation, and may
influence the results of research-based or diagnostic
tests associated with blood. Research scientists must
ensure that their blood DNA isolation method is flexible,
i.e. it can work efficiently in isolating DNA from
the specific anticoagulant used for the blood collection.
EDTA is the anticoagulant of choice for blood
collection for DNA extractions because it inhibits
DNase activity and does not change the quantity of
DNA. However, it does affect magnesium concentrations
in downstream applications. Heparin should be
avoided, as it can bind to DNA during purification and
can inhibit Taq polymerase used for polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) (1). In other words, sodium heparin,
an anticoagulant used widely for blood collection,
has been known to inhibit DNA polymerase activity
in PCR assays (2). Irrespective of the anticoagulant,
the vacutainer tube should be inverted several times
to mix the blood. Blood can be shipped at ambient
temperature, but if the delay between collection and
extraction is more than three days, there will be some
degradation of DNA and the yield will be lower than
that from fresh blood. On the whole, it is advisable to
transport blood samples at 4˚C to avoid degradation
of biological samples. The most common method of storage of DNA is as a suspension in ethanol at -80˚C, however, isolated DNA can be stored at 4˚C for several weeks, at -20˚C for several months and at -80˚C for several years. Factors that affect the stability of biological samples include anticoagulants (3), stabilizing agents (4), temperature (5), timing before initial processing (6), sterility, endogenous degrading properties (enzymes, cell death), etc., (7). Nuclease contamination must be avoided but the main threat to DNA preservation is usually chemical degradation. The concentration of magnesium ion in the buffers is critical to obtain intact and, high molecular weight DNA. It has been shown that DNA samples remain intact for longer when DNA is dissolved in higher concentrations of EDTA (2).The aim of present study to find out I. the quality and quantity of DNA isolated from blood collected in EDTA and sodium heparin vacutainer tubes, II. the effect of EDTA and sodium heparin on DNA during long term storage at -20˚C and III. effects on the application of such DNA for molecular techniques.Two ml of blood were randomly collected in 4 ml EDTA tubes (ref 367861) and in heparin tubes (ref 367871) (BD Vacutainer, USA) from the same 10 healthy Holstein bulls, by a trained veterinarian. Blood samples were transported in cool packs from the farm to our laboratory. As soon as the blood samples reached to the laboratory, they were kept refrigerated at 4˚C. DNA was extracted within 5 days of collection using the phenol-chloroform (SRL, India) standard protocol, with little modification of the procedure. After extraction, the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from EDTA and heparinised blood were determined using nano-spectrophotometry (Thermo Fisher, USA) at 260/280 optical density (OD) as indicated in table 1. The experiment was designed in such a manner that this procedure was repeated after every three months of storage at -20˚C. The quality and quantity of DNA were recorded every time and differences between the first and second observations were calculated. In the same way, differences in the quality and quantity of DNA from both types of extraction were calculated between third and second reading, fourth and third reading, and the fifth and fourth reading as shown in table 1. Finally the quality of DNA after long term storage was visualized on 0.8% agarose gel (Lonza, USA) electrophoresis and subjected to PCR. As described earlier (3) with minor modifications, the PCR was set up containing 100 ng of genomic DNA template, 0.4 pM each of forward (5ˊCCCACTGGCTAGGAATCGTT3ˊ) and reverse (5ˊCAAGGCAATGTCATATCCAC3ˊ) primers, 1X PCR buffer, 400 μM each deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTP) and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase, in a final reaction volume of 25 μl. The PCR buffer, dNTP and Taq DNA polymerase used in PCR are from Kapa Biosystem, USA, whereas primers are from MWG-Biotech from Germany. The PCR was carried out using a thermal cycler (Applied Bio System, USA). Initial denaturation was achieved at 94˚C for 3 minutes followed by 30 cycles of 94˚C for 1.5 minutes, annealing of primers at 55˚C for 1 minute and extension at 72˚C for 2 minutes followed by final extension at 72˚C for 10 minutes. The amplification products were analyzed in 1.5% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma, USA) and viewed under ultra violate (UV) light.
Table 1
Concentration and optical density (OD) of DNA extracted from blood using different anticoagulants
23/10/2012
23/01/2013
Difference
23/04/2013
Difference
23/07/2013
Difference
23/10/2013
Difference
BULL ID
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Conc.
260/280
Heparin
558
299.9
1.87
299
1.86
0.9
0.01
234.4
1.84
64.6
0.02
234.1
1.84
0.3
0
227
1.84
7.1
0
594
79.9
1.88
78.5
1.87
1.4
0.01
54.4
1.84
24.1
0.03
54.4
1.84
0
0
54.4
1.84
0
0
575
432.8
1.86
432.1
1.85
0.7
0.01
369.8
1.84
62.3
0.01
369.2
1.84
0.6
0
369.2
1.84
0
0
2456
172
1.87
171.9
1.86
0.1
0.01
128.4
1.82
43.5
0.04
128.1
1.82
0.3
0
128.1
1.82
0
0
573
151.5
1.87
150.6
1.86
0.9
0.01
150
1.83
0.6
0.03
150
1.83
0
0
150
1.83
0
0
557
29.3
1.86
27.4
1.85
1.9
0.01
20.8
1.82
6.6
0.03
19.2
1.8
1.6
0.02
19.2
1.8
0
0
570
296.8
1.83
295.5
1.83
1.3
0
210.3
1.83
85.2
0
205.2
1.82
5.1
0.01
205.2
1.82
0
0
589
265.4
1.87
262.2
1.86
3.2
0.01
223.9
1.83
38.3
0.03
204.6
1.82
19.3
0.01
204.6
1.82
0
0
593
40.15
1.89
21.13
1.89
19.02
0
17.9
1.85
3.23
0.04
17.1
1.84
0.8
0.01
17.1
1.84
0
0
590
350.1
1.86
349.9
1.85
0.2
0.01
288.1
1.84
61.8
0.01
288
1.83
0.1
0.01
288
1.83
0
0
EDTA
558
399.5
1.85
398
1.84
1.5
0.01
242.2
1.84
155.8
0
242.1
1.84
0.1
0
242.1
1.84
0
0
594
428.5
1.86
427.6
1.85
0.9
0.01
364
1.84
63.6
0.01
364
1.84
0
0
364
1.84
0
0
575
276.5
1.88
276
1.88
0.5
0
128
1.88
148
0
128
1.88
0
0
126.9
1.88
1.1
0
2456
282
1.87
281.3
1.86
0.7
0.01
281
1.86
0.3
0
280.9
1.86
0.1
0
261.9
1.86
19
0
573
262
2.05
261.8
2.05
0.2
0
250.2
2.04
11.6
0.01
250
2.02
0.2
0.02
185.3
2.02
64.7
0
557
313.9
1.86
313.8
1.85
0.1
0.01
180.9
1.82
132.9
0.03
180.9
1.82
0
0
180.8
1.82
0.1
0
570
513.2
1.84
512.2
1.83
1
0.01
244.8
1.83
267.4
0
244.8
1.83
0
0
244.8
1.83
0
0
589
37.7
1.88
36.45
1.85
1.25
0.03
35.4
1.85
1.05
0
35.2
1.85
0.2
0
35.2
1.84
0
0.01
593
853.1
1.84
853.1
1.84
0
0
731.6
1.84
121.5
0
731.2
1.84
0.4
0
731.2
1.84
0
0
590
247.1
1.91
246.3
1.91
0.8
0
246.1
1.87
0.2
0.04
240
1.87
6.1
0
240
1.86
0
0.01
EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, ID; identification number of bull and Conc.; Concentration
In order to determine the yield of DNA isolated from each blood sample collected using the different anticoagulants, samples were measured using the nano-spectrophotometric method. The highest DNA yield was obtained from blood collected on EDTA (853.1 μg). Table 1 shows the DNA concentration and reading taken at 260/280 OD on 23.10.12 for both samples. The first DNA concentration readings ranged from 29.3 to 432.8 and from 37.7 to 853.1 for heparin and EDTA respectively. The first OD reading ranged from 1.83 to 1.89 and 1.84 to 2.05 for heparin and EDTA blood DNA respectively. The second readings were taken after a gap of three months storage at -20˚C. The differences between the second and first reading for DNA extracted from heparin and EDTA blood, were estimated. The concentration of DNA from heparin and EDTA blood cells ranged from 0.1 to 3.2 (with the exception of 19.02 in one sample), and 0.1 to 1.5 respectively. Similarly the differences between OD of two readings in case of heparinised and EDTA DNA were observed more or less same as indicated in table 1. Similarly the differences between third second readings, fourth – third and fifth – fourth were also observed. The observations on concentration of genomic DNA indicate degradation of DNA extracted from heparinised blood and EDTA blood was ranged from 1.5 to 91.6 (Table 2, Fig.1) and 2.5 to 268.4 (Table 3, Fig.2) respectively during one year. The OD readings were more or less same for all the DNA samples. The degradation of EDTA DNA was rather higher than heparinised DNA.
Table 2
Concentration of DNA extracted from Heparinised blood
Sample
Conc. (1)
Conc. (2)
Conc. (3)
Conc. (4)
Conc. (5)
Final difference(Conc.1-Conc.5)
558
299.9
299
234.4
234.1
227
72.9
594
79.9
78.5
54.4
54.4
54.4
25.5
575
432.8
432.1
369.8
369.2
369.2
63.6
2456
172
171.9
128.4
128.1
128.1
43.9
573
151.5
150.6
150
150
150
1.5
557
29.3
27.4
20.8
19.2
19.2
10.1
570
296.8
295.5
210.3
205.2
205.2
91.6
589
265.4
262.2
223.9
204.6
204.6
60.8
593
40.15
21.13
17.9
17.1
17.1
23.05
590
350.1
349.9
288.1
288
288
62.1
Conc.; Concentration.
Fig.1
Concentration of DNA extracted from heparinised blood.
Conc.; Concentration.
Table 3
Concentration of DNA extracted from EDTA blood
Sample
Conc. (1)
Conc. (2)
Conc. (3)
Conc. (4)
Conc. (5)
Final difference(Conc.1-Conc.5)
558
399.5
398
242.2
242.1
242.1
157.4
594
428.5
427.6
364
364
364
64.5
575
276.5
276
128
128
126.9
149.6
2456
282
281.3
281
280.9
261.9
20.1
573
262
261.8
250.2
250
185.3
76.7
557
313.9
313.8
180.9
180.9
180.8
133.1
570
513.2
512.2
244.8
244.8
244.8
268.4
589
37.7
36.45
35.4
35.2
35.2
2.5
593
853.1
853.1
731.6
731.2
731.2
121.9
590
247.1
246.3
246.1
240
240
7.1
EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and Conc.; Concentration.
Fig.2
Concentration of DNA extracted from EDTA blood.
Conc; Concentration and EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Concentration and optical density (OD) of DNA extracted from blood using different anticoagulantsEDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, ID; identification number of bull and Conc.; ConcentrationConcentration of DNA extracted from Heparinised bloodConc.; Concentration.Concentration of DNA extracted from EDTA bloodEDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and Conc.; Concentration.Concentration of DNA extracted from heparinised blood.Conc.; Concentration.Concentration of DNA extracted from EDTA blood.Conc; Concentration and EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.After storage for a year, the quality of DNA extracted from blood using the two anticoagulants was also visualized in 0.8% agarose (Fig.3), which indicates good quality. As a test the same DNA samples were used for the following downstream application; PCR for factor XI deficiency syndrome in cattle. Gel electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose indicated quality PCR product of 244 bp (Fig.4). DNA extracted from blood samples using the two anticoagulants revealed equally good quality of PCR product for genetic disease diagnosis in cattle. There is a paucity of literatures comparing the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from blood using various anticoagulants. However, literature exists on the effect of collection, handling, transportation conditions and storage conditions before and after extraction of DNA (1, 8). Information can also be obtained from some of the pamphlets published by Norgen Biotek (www.norgenbiotek.com) and Biomerica.
Fig.3
Lane 1, 2 and 3 indicate DNA extracted from blood samples collected in Heparin tubes, lane 4 is DNA ladder of 100 bp and lane 5, 6 and 7 indicate DNA extracted from EDTA blood.
EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Fig.4
PCR product by using FXI specific primers. Lane 1 indicates blank, lane 2, 3 and 4 indicate PCR product by using DNA extracted from Heparin blood, lane 5 indicates DNA ladder of 100 bp and lane 6, 7 and 8 indicate PCR product by using DNA extracted from EDTA blood.
PCR; Polymerase chain reaction, FXI; Factor XI deficiency syndrome and EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
The present study shows that the DNA extracted from heparin tubes can also be effectively used for genetic disease diagnosis in cattle.Lane 1, 2 and 3 indicate DNA extracted from blood samples collected in Heparin tubes, lane 4 is DNA ladder of 100 bp and lane 5, 6 and 7 indicate DNA extracted from EDTA blood.
EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.PCR product by using FXI specific primers. Lane 1 indicates blank, lane 2, 3 and 4 indicate PCR product by using DNA extracted from Heparin blood, lane 5 indicates DNA ladder of 100 bp and lane 6, 7 and 8 indicate PCR product by using DNA extracted from EDTA blood.PCR; Polymerase chain reaction, FXI; Factor XI deficiency syndrome and EDTA; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.