| Literature DB >> 25870777 |
Isabella Børja1, Gry Alfredsen1, Tore Filbakk1, Carl Gunnar Fossdal1.
Abstract
The demand for bioenergy caused an increased use of logging residues, branches and treetops that were previously left on the ground after harvesting. Residues are stored outdoors in piles and it is unclear to what extent fungi transform this material. Our objective was to quantify the amount of wood degrading fungi during storage using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to detect basidiomycetous DNA in logging residues, a novel approach in this field. We found that the qPCR method was accurate in quantifying the fungal DNA during storage. As the moisture content of the piled logging residues decreased during the storage period, the fungal DNA content also decreased. Scots pine residues contained more fungal DNA than residues from Norway spruce. Loose piles had generally more fungal DNA than bundled ones.Entities:
Keywords: Bioenergy; Forest slash; Fuel quality; Fungal colonisation; Quantitative real-time PCR
Year: 2015 PMID: 25870777 PMCID: PMC4393809 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Experimental setup.
After the first harvesting (felling of trees) the material was pre-stored by being left on the clear-cut during the winter. In the second and third harvesting periods piles of bundled (triangle symbol) and loose residues (trapezoid symbol) were constructed. At each sampling one bundled pile and a quarter of a loose pile were analyzed.
Description of parameters used in the study.
| Parameter | Type | Explanation | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvesting time | categorical | Season when the trees were cut (harvested) | Start, spring, autumn |
| Storage time | categorical | Days after the piles were made | Days |
| Precipitation | continuous | Mean precipitation since last sampling | Mm |
| Temperature | continuous | Mean temperature within piles | °C |
| Wood moisture | continuous | Moisture content measured in the sampled material | % |
| Tree species | categorical | Dominant tree species in the logging residue | Spruce, pine |
| Storage method | categorical | Piles made of loose or bundled forest residues | Start, loose, bundles |
| Calorific value | continuous | The amount of energy per kg given off when burnt | MJ/kg |
| Total dry matter loss | continuous | Total loss of dry matter during the storage, including fall off needles, twigs and microbial degradation | % |
| Placement | categorical | Location of bundles within piles | Top, bottom, middle |
| Pre-storage | categorical | Leaving the logging residue spread on the clear-cut site after harvesting, throughout the winter | Pre-storage, piles |
Test statistics and parameter estimates of the model.
|
| ||
|
| 0.68 | |
| 0.65 | ||
| RMSE (Root Mean Square error) | 0.10 | |
| N | 133 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Intercept | 0.3350 | 0.0024 |
| Storage time | −0.0004 | <.0001 |
| Precipitation mm | 0.0333 | <.0001 |
| Storage method | – | <.0001 |
| Mean temperature | −0.0054 | 0.0040 |
| Harvesting time | – | 0.0061 |
| Tree species | – | 0.0091 |
| Wood moisture*storage method | – | 0.0397 |
| Wood moisture | −0.0045 | 0.0398 |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
| Harvesting time [Autumn 2007] | 0.0301 | A |
| Harvesting time [Spring 2008] | 0.0218 | A |
| Harvesting time [Autumn 2008] | −0.0519 | B |
| Tree species [pine] | 0.0351 | A |
| Tree species [spruce] | −0.0351 | B |
| Storage method [Start] | −0.1393 | C |
| Storage method [Bundle] | 0.0334 | B |
| Storage method [Loose] | 0.1059 | A |
| Wood moisture*storage method [Start] | 0.0079 | – |
| Wood moisture*storage method [Bundle] | −0.0026 | – |
| Wood moisture*storage method [Loose] | −0.0053 | – |
Notes.
Significance level 0.05.
Figure 2Amount of DNAbas (ng/mg logging residue) detected in logging residue after increasing storage time (days) in all five stands, in loose and bundled piles of spruce and pine (n = 133).
Standard errors are marked as vertical lines and means are compared by Tukey–Kramer test at P < 0.05, where different letters denote significant differences.
Figure 3Predicted estimates of DNAbas in logging residues (ng DNA/mg logging residue) in relation to harvesting time, storage time, precipitation, temperature, moisture content, tree species and storage method.
Vertical and horizontal dotted lines show the current values for variables on x and y-axes. The black lines show how the predicted value of the variables on the y-axes change with changing of the values on the x-axes. The 95% confidence interval for the predicted values is shown by striped line surrounding the prediction trace (or error bar for categorical variables harvesting time, tree species and storage method).