| Literature DB >> 25870563 |
Kinda Khalaf1, Herbert F Jelinek2, Caroline Robinson3, David J Cornforth4, Mika P Tarvainen5, Hayder Al-Aubaidy6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physiological interactions are abundant within, and between, body systems. These interactions may evolve into discrete states during pathophysiological processes resulting from common mechanisms. An association between arterial stenosis, identified by low ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) as been reported. Whether an association between vascular calcification-characterized by high ABPI and a different pathophysiology-is similarly associated with CVD, has not been established. The current study aims to investigate the association between ABPI, and cardiac rhythm, as an indicator of cardiovascular health and functionality, utilizing heart rate variability (HRV). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI); atherosclerosis; calcification; complex systems; heart rate variability (HRV); network physiology; peripheral vascular disease (PVD)
Year: 2015 PMID: 25870563 PMCID: PMC4376075 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Progression and divergence of peripheral vascular disease and HRV.
Physiological differences in the cohort between those with normal, low and high ABPI.
| Gender (F/M) | 57/44 | 39/28 | 33/33 |
| Age (years) | 61.4 ± 13.3 | 63 ± 12 | 59 ± 11 |
| Diabetes Type 2 (years) | 4.7 ± 8 | 4.5 ± 6 | 2.26 ± 5 |
| Diabetes Type 2 (%) | 18.2 | 13.1 | 8.9 |
| CVD (years) | 0.6 ± 2.8 | 1.5 ± 4 | 0.4 ± 2 |
| HT (years) | 3.4 ± 8.9 | 8.1 ± 12 | 3.2 ± 8 |
| WC (cm) | 93.53.4 ± 15.5 | 100.1 ± 18.4 | 96.1 ± 12.7 |
| BMI | 28.7 ± 6.1 | 29.7 ± 6.6 | 28.3 ± 5.5 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 133.8 ± 17.4 | 139.8 ± 18.6# | 124.5 ± 14 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.6 ± 8.6 | 80 ± 10.1 | 76 ± 9 |
| Average ABPI | 1.16 ± 0.05 | 0.96 ± 0.1# | 1.31 ± 0.05 |
p < 0.05 significant for low vs. high ABPI.
p < 0.05 normal vs. low ABPI.
p < 0.05 normal vs. high ABPI; CVD, cardiovascular disease reported; HT, hypertension reported; WC,waist circumference; BMI, body-mass-index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ABPI, ankle-brachial-pressure-index. (Values in mean ± standard deviation).
Differences in measured blood chemistry between those with normal, low and high ABPI.
| BGL (mmol/L) | 6.81 ± 2.9 | 6.2 ± 1.9 | 6.1 ± 2.9 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.5 ± 1.1 | 6.7 ± 1.2 | 6.1 ± 0.8 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.02 ± 1 | 4.89 ± 1.05 | 5.1 ± 1.4 |
| Trigs (mmol/L) | 1.41 ± 0.9 | 1.46 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.7 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.49 ± 0.5 | 1.51 ± 0.5 | 1.53 ± 0.5 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.89 ± 0.9 | 2.7 ± 1 | 3 ± 1.2 |
| TC/HDL | 3.6 ± 1 | 3.5 ± 1.1 | 3.6 ± 1.3 |
p < 0.05 is significant for low vs. high ABPI.
#p < 0.05 normal vs. low ABPI.
p < 0.05 normal vs. high ABPI; BGL, blood glucose level; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; TC, total cholesterol; Trigs, triglycerides; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; TC/HDL, total cholesterol: high density lipoprotein ratio. (Values in mean ± standard deviation).
Differences in measured HRV between those with normal, low and high ABPI.
| SDNN (ms) | 40.7 ± 19 | 42.9 ± 18.5 | 39.6 ± 16.6 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 28.1 ± 26.8 | 31.5 ± 25.3 | 28.4 ± 19.2 |
| pNN(50) (ms) | 11.8 ± 18.3 | 9.9 ± 13.7 | 10.4 ± 19.1 |
| LF (ms2) | 432.9 ± 573.8 | 432 ± 519.5 | 430.5 ± 454.7 |
| HF (ms2) | 385.4 ± 819.2 | 419 ± 630.7 | 413.6 ± 673.3 |
| LFnu | 57.4 ± 18 | 50.9 ± 17.3 | 53.6 ± 19.3 |
| HFnu | 41.5 ± 45.1 | 43 ± 16.3 | 41.7 ± 18.4 |
| LF/HF | 2.3 ± 2.2 | 1.6 ± 1.7 | 2.1 ± 2.4 |
| SD1 | 28.8 ± 25.7 | 28.7 ± 24.6 | 22.4 ± 21.4 |
| SD2 | 56.7 ± 4.42 | 54.2 ± 21.1 | 49.6 ± 25.7 |
| DFAα1 | 1.03 ± 0.3 | 0.91 ± 0.28 | 1.02 ± 0.3 |
| SampEn | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.72 ± 0.6 | 1.52 ± 0.3 |
p < 0.05 is significant for low vs. high ABPI.
p <0.05 normal vs. low ABPI.
p < 0.05 normal vs. high ABPI; LF, low frequency power; HF, high frequency power; LFnu, low frequency normalized units; HFnu, high frequency normalized units; LF/HF, ratio of low frequency to high frequency power; DFAα1, short-term scaling for detrended fluctuation analysis; SampEn, sample entropy. (Values in mean ± standard deviation).
Figure 2Nonlinear HRV for normal, low and high APBI centile groups.
Figure 3Time and frequency domain HRV results comparing normal, low and high APBI groups.