Literature DB >> 25870399

Ectoparasites and fitness of female Columbian ground squirrels.

Shirley Raveh1, Peter Neuhaus2, F Stephen Dobson3.   

Abstract

Parasites play an important role in the evolution of host traits via natural selection, coevolution and sexually selected ornaments used in mate choice. These evolutionary scenarios assume fitness costs for hosts. To test this assumption, we conducted an ectoparasite removal experiment in free-living Columbian ground squirrels (Urocittelus columbianus) in four populations over three years. Adult females were randomly chosen to be either experimentally treated with anti-parasite treatments (spot-on solution and flea powder, N = 61) or a sham treatment (control, N = 44). We expected that experimental females would show better body condition, increased reproductive success and enhanced survival. Contrary to our expectations, body mass was not significantly different between treatments at mating, birth of litter or weaning of young. Further, neither number nor size of young at weaning differed significantly between the two treatments. Survival to the next spring for adult females and juveniles was not significantly different between experimental and control treatments. Finally, annual fitness was not affected by the treatments. We concluded that females and their offspring were able compensate for the presence of ectoparasites, suggesting little or no fitness costs of parasites for females in the different colonies and during the years of our experiments.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Columbian ground squirrel; body weight; ectoparasites; parasite removal; reproduction; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25870399      PMCID: PMC4410379          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  28 in total

Review 1.  Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Parasite-host coevolution.

Authors:  R M May; R M Anderson
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort.

Authors:  M F Hirshfield; D W Tinkle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Parasites as a viability cost of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals.

Authors:  Sarah L Moore; Kenneth Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Delayed phenology and reduced fitness associated with climate change in a wild hibernator.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Lane; Loeske E B Kruuk; Anne Charmantier; Jan O Murie; F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The blood parasite Haemoproteus reduces survival in a wild bird: a medication experiment.

Authors:  Josué Martínez-de la Puente; Santiago Merino; Gustavo Tomás; Juan Moreno; Judith Morales; Elisa Lobato; Sonia García-Fraile; Eduardo Jorge Belda
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Efficacy of selamectin in the prevention of adult heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection in dogs in northern Italy.

Authors:  R G Clemence; P Sarasola; C Genchi; D G Smith; D J Shanks; A D Jernigan; T G Rowan
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2000-08-23       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  When is a parasite not a parasite? Effects of larval tick burdens on white-footed mouse survival.

Authors:  Michelle H Hersh; Shannon L LaDeau; M Andrea Previtali; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  What drives population-level effects of parasites? Meta-analysis meets life-history.

Authors:  Maggie J Watson
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.674

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sociality and health: impacts of sociality on disease susceptibility and transmission in animal and human societies.

Authors:  Peter M Kappeler; Sylvia Cremer; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The sociality-health-fitness nexus: synthesis, conclusions and future directions.

Authors:  Charles L Nunn; Meggan E Craft; Thomas R Gillespie; Mark Schaller; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effects of parasitism on host reproductive investment in a rodent-flea system: host litter size matters.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Warburton; Irina S Khokhlova; Elizabeth M Dlugosz; Luther Van Der Mescht; Boris R Krasnov
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Primate reinfection with gastrointestinal parasites: behavioural and physiological predictors of parasite acquisition.

Authors:  Sagan Friant; Toni E Ziegler; Tony L Goldberg
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Field Evidence of Mosquito Population Regulation by a Gregarine Parasite.

Authors:  John Soghigian; Todd Livdahl
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 6.  Siphonaptera of Canada.

Authors:  Terry D Galloway
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 1.546

7.  Time budget, oxygen consumption and body mass responses to parasites in juvenile and adult wild rodents.

Authors:  Mario Garrido; Valeria Hochman Adler; Meital Pnini; Zvika Abramsky; Boris R Krasnov; Roee Gutman; Noga Kronfeld-Schor; Hadas Hawlena
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  The effects of food and parasitism on reproductive performance of a wild rodent.

Authors:  Pei-Jen L Shaner; Ai-Yun Yu; Shou-Hsien Li; Ching-Ho Hou
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.