Harriet Alexander1, Bethany D Jenkins2, Tatiana A Rynearson3, Sonya T Dyhrman4. 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography/Applied Ocean Science and Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139; Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543; 2. Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881; and. 3. Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882; 4. Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964 sdyhrman@ldeo.columbia.edu.
Abstract
Diverse communities of marine phytoplankton carry out half of global primary production. The vast diversity of the phytoplankton has long perplexed ecologists because these organisms coexist in an isotropic environment while competing for the same basic resources (e.g., inorganic nutrients). Differential niche partitioning of resources is one hypothesis to explain this "paradox of the plankton," but it is difficult to quantify and track variation in phytoplankton metabolism in situ. Here, we use quantitative metatranscriptome analyses to examine pathways of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) metabolism in diatoms that cooccur regularly in an estuary on the east coast of the United States (Narragansett Bay). Expression of known N and P metabolic pathways varied between diatoms, indicating apparent differences in resource utilization capacity that may prevent direct competition. Nutrient amendment incubations skewed N/P ratios, elucidating nutrient-responsive patterns of expression and facilitating a quantitative comparison between diatoms. The resource-responsive (RR) gene sets deviated in composition from the metabolic profile of the organism, being enriched in genes associated with N and P metabolism. Expression of the RR gene set varied over time and differed significantly between diatoms, resulting in opposite transcriptional responses to the same environment. Apparent differences in metabolic capacity and the expression of that capacity in the environment suggest that diatom-specific resource partitioning was occurring in Narragansett Bay. This high-resolution approach highlights the molecular underpinnings of diatom resource utilization and how cooccurring diatoms adjust their cellular physiology to partition their niche space.
Diverse communities of marine phytoplankton carry out half of global primary production. The vast diversity of the phytoplankton has long perplexed ecologists because these organisms coexist in an isotropic environment while competing for the same basic resources (e.g., inorganic nutrients). Differential niche partitioning of resources is one hypothesis to explain this "paradox of the plankton," but it is difficult to quantify and track variation in phytoplankton metabolism in situ. Here, we use quantitative metatranscriptome analyses to examine pathways of n class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) and n class="Chemical">phosphorus (P) metabolism in diatoms that cooccur regularly in an estuary on the east coast of the United States (Narragansett Bay). Expression of known N and P metabolic pathways varied between diatoms, indicating apparent differences in resource utilization capacity that may prevent direct competition. Nutrient amendment incubations skewed N/P ratios, elucidating nutrient-responsive patterns of expression and facilitating a quantitative comparison between diatoms. The resource-responsive (RR) gene sets deviated in composition from the metabolic profile of the organism, being enriched in genes associated with N and P metabolism. Expression of the RR gene set varied over time and differed significantly between diatoms, resulting in opposite transcriptional responses to the same environment. Apparent differences in metabolic capacity and the expression of that capacity in the environment suggest that diatom-specific resource partitioning was occurring in Narragansett Bay. This high-resolution approach highlights the molecular underpinnings of diatom resource utilization and how cooccurring diatoms adjust their cellular physiology to partition their niche space.
Authors: Johanna M Rinta-Kanto; Shulei Sun; Shalabh Sharma; Ronald P Kiene; Mary Ann Moran Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Andrew E Allen; Julie Laroche; Uma Maheswari; Markus Lommer; Nicolas Schauer; Pascal J Lopez; Giovanni Finazzi; Alisdair R Fernie; Chris Bowler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rintaro Saito; Michael E Smoot; Keiichiro Ono; Johannes Ruscheinski; Peng-Liang Wang; Samad Lotia; Alexander R Pico; Gary D Bader; Trey Ideker Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2002-06-18 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Harriet Alexander; Mónica Rouco; Sheean T Haley; Samuel T Wilson; David M Karl; Sonya T Dyhrman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David A Caron; Harriet Alexander; Andrew E Allen; John M Archibald; E Virginia Armbrust; Charles Bachy; Callum J Bell; Arvind Bharti; Sonya T Dyhrman; Stephanie M Guida; Karla B Heidelberg; Jonathan Z Kaye; Julia Metzner; Sarah R Smith; Alexandra Z Worden Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Joshua M A Stough; Max Kolton; Joel E Kostka; David J Weston; Dale A Pelletier; Steven W Wilhelm Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Catherine A Garcia; George I Hagstrom; Alyse A Larkin; Lucas J Ustick; Simon A Levin; Michael W Lomas; Adam C Martiny Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Lucas Moitinho-Silva; Cristina Díez-Vives; Giampiero Batani; Ana Is Esteves; Martin T Jahn; Torsten Thomas Journal: ISME J Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Spencer C Galen; Janus Borner; Jessie L Williamson; Christopher C Witt; Susan L Perkins Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 7.090