Literature DB >> 25869162

Limited post-mortem examination. An alternative and viable way to avoid full examination?

Beng Beng Ong1, Nathan Milne.   

Abstract

A complete post-mortem examination is required in most medicolegal investigation systems. Though uncommon, some jurisdictions allow limited post-mortem examination if it is adequate to fulfil the death inquiries. One such jurisdiction is the state of Queensland with the commencement of the new Coroners Act. It permits the Coroner to order limited post-mortem examination confined to a specific region or regions of the body based on the circumstances received from the investigating police.There is a paucity of literature comparing the completeness of limited post-mortem examination compared with complete examination. We aim to study whether limited post-mortem examination can partially replace complete examination in specific circumstances. Archival post-mortem reports with history are obtained. Cases where obvious complete post-mortem examination is required [e.g., sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), homicide, medicolegal hospital cases, pregnancy deaths], decomposed and skeletonized cases are excluded from the study. The region or regions (head, neck, chest, or abdomen) most appropriate for examination are derived from studying the circumstances given.Three hundred and fifty-one cases were reviewed, of which 136 were found to be suitable to be incorporated into the study. Discrepancies were present in 17.7% (n = 24) of the cases (15 cases due to different cause of death, seven due to changes in interpretation, and two where pathology may be significant to the family). When classified according to mode of death, the percentages were 46.4%, 11.1%, and 9.3% for the accident, natural, and suicide groups, respectively. When compared to region examined, the discrepancies were 9 out of 18 for head, 1 out of 20 for neck, 5 out of 70 for chest, none of out 2 for extremities, and 3 out of 4 for abdomen.The study showed a significantly high percentage of discrepancies when limited post-mortem examination was performed. The missed information may impede medicolegal inquiries, police investigation, and interfere with the course of justice. Significant information about familial disease may be missed.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 25869162     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-007-0021-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  12 in total

1.  Postmortem percutaneous core biopsy of the liver.

Authors:  S J Cina; J E Smialek
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)--a feasibility study.

Authors:  Michael J Thali; Kathrin Yen; Wolf Schweitzer; Peter Vock; Chris Boesch; Christoph Ozdoba; Gerhard Schroth; Michael Ith; Martin Sonnenschein; Tanja Doernhoefer; Eva Scheurer; Thomas Plattner; Richard Dirnhofer
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Autopsy.

Authors:  Michael J Clark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a "view and grant" system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales.

Authors:  G N Rutty; R M Duerden; N Carter; J C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Endoscopic autopsy.

Authors:  R Avrahami; S Watemberg; E Daniels-Philips; T Kahana; J Hiss
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 0.921

6.  Clinical necropsy rates during the 1980s: the continued decline.

Authors:  R D Start; T A McCulloch; E W Benbow; I Lauder; J C Underwood
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s.

Authors:  J Mercer; I C Talbot
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Necropsy practice after the "organ retention scandal": requests, performance, and tissue retention.

Authors:  J L Burton; J C E Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Accuracy of cause of death determination without forensic autopsy examination.

Authors:  Marcus B Nashelsky; Christopher H Lawrence
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.921

10.  A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy.

Authors:  F Foroudi; K Cheung; J Duflou
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.