Literature DB >> 25869024

Effect of superficial cervical plexus block on postoperative quality of recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Ramamani Mariappan1, Jigesh Mehta, Eric Massicotte, Mahesh Nagappa, Pirjo Manninen, Lashmi Venkatraghavan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spine surgeries are increasingly being performed as a day or short-stay surgery programs. Peripheral nerve block provide site-specific pain relief with few side effects, thereby reducing surgical stress and enhancing quality of recovery. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of a superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, we enrolled adults (> 18 yr) scheduled for elective single- or two-level ACDF in this randomized double-blind clinical trial. Participants were randomized to receive either a SCPB (0.25% bupivacaine, 10 mL) or No Block. The primary outcome measure was the quality of recovery at 24 hr, measured using the 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-40). In addition, comparisons between groups were also made for postoperative opioid consumption and discharge times.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients were randomized to receive either a SCPB block (n = 23) or No Block (n = 23). Median [interquartile range] aggregated global QoR-40 scores at 24 hr were significantly greater in the SCPB group, indicating good quality of recovery compared with the No Block group (179 [116-195] vs 157 [97-196], respectively; median difference, 22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7 to 34; P = 0.002]. There were no differences between the SCPB and the No Block group with regard to mean (standard deviation) postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hr [22.9 (13.6) mg vs 24.6 (9.5) mg, respectively; mean difference 1.7; 95% CI, -5.2 to 8.7; P = 0.620] and the number of patients discharged within 24 hr (15 vs 12, respectively; P = 0.550).
CONCLUSION: We showed that preoperative SCPB is an effective strategy for improving the early quality of recovery in patients undergoing single- or two-level ACDF. Nevertheless, there was no impact on opioid consumption or discharge times. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01662219).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25869024     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0382-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of external nasal nerve block following nasal surgery : A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  M Ibrahim; A M Elnabtity; A Keera
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery.

Authors:  Myoung Hwa Kim; Min Soo Kim; Jae Hoon Lee; Jae Hi Seo; Jeong-Rim Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Comparison of ultrasound-guided intermediate vs subcutaneous cervical plexus block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy: A randomised double-blind trial.

Authors:  Kartik Syal; Ankita Chandel; Avinash Goyal; Arunima Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-01-07

4.  Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Wenjun Meng; Chengwei Yang; Xin Wei; Sheng Wang; Fang Kang; Xiang Huang; Juan Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Cervical plexus block.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko; Seunguk Bang; Hyungtae Kim; Sook Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-04

6.  Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Mulcahy; Thananchayan Elalingam; Kevin Jang; Mario D'Souza; Matthew Tait
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.