Matthew R Kaufman1, Andrew I Elkwood1, Farid Aboharb2, John Cece2, David Brown3, Kameron Rezzadeh4, Reza Jarrahy4. 1. The Center for Treatment of Paralysis and Reconstructive Nerve Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey. 2. The Institute for Advanced Reconstruction, Shrewsbury, New Jersey. 3. Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, Edison, New Jersey. 4. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients who are ventilator dependent as a result of combined cervical spinal cord injury and phrenic nerve lesions are generally considered to be unsuitable candidates for diaphragmatic pacing due to loss of phrenic nerve integrity and denervation of the diaphragm. There is limited data regarding efficacy of simultaneous nerve transfers and diaphragmatic pacemakers in the treatment of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 14 consecutive patients with combined lesions of the cervical spinal cord and phrenic nerves, and with complete ventilator dependence, who were treated with simultaneous microsurgical nerve transfer and implantation of diaphragmatic pacemakers. Parameters of interest included time to recovery of diaphragm electromyographic activity, average time pacing without the ventilator, and percent reduction in ventilator dependence. RESULTS: Recovery of diaphragm electromyographic activity was demonstrated in 13 of 14 (93%) patients. Eight of these 13 (62%) patients achieved sustainable periods (> 1 h/d) of ventilator weaning (mean = 10 h/d [n = 8]). Two patients recovered voluntary control of diaphragmatic activity and regained the capacity for spontaneous respiration. The one patient who did not exhibit diaphragmatic reinnervation remains within 12 months of initial treatment. Surgical intervention resulted in a 25% reduction (p < 0.05) in ventilator dependency. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that simultaneous nerve transfers and pacemaker implantation can result in reinnervation of the diaphragm and lead to successful ventilator weaning. Our favorable outcomes support consideration of this surgical method for appropriate patients who would otherwise have no alternative therapy to achieve sustained periods of ventilator independence. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
BACKGROUND:Patients who are ventilator dependent as a result of combined cervical spinal cord injury and phrenic nerve lesions are generally considered to be unsuitable candidates for diaphragmatic pacing due to loss of phrenic nerve integrity and denervation of the diaphragm. There is limited data regarding efficacy of simultaneous nerve transfers and diaphragmatic pacemakers in the treatment of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 14 consecutive patients with combined lesions of the cervical spinal cord and phrenic nerves, and with complete ventilator dependence, who were treated with simultaneous microsurgical nerve transfer and implantation of diaphragmatic pacemakers. Parameters of interest included time to recovery of diaphragm electromyographic activity, average time pacing without the ventilator, and percent reduction in ventilator dependence. RESULTS: Recovery of diaphragm electromyographic activity was demonstrated in 13 of 14 (93%) patients. Eight of these 13 (62%) patients achieved sustainable periods (> 1 h/d) of ventilator weaning (mean = 10 h/d [n = 8]). Two patients recovered voluntary control of diaphragmatic activity and regained the capacity for spontaneous respiration. The one patient who did not exhibit diaphragmatic reinnervation remains within 12 months of initial treatment. Surgical intervention resulted in a 25% reduction (p < 0.05) in ventilator dependency. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that simultaneous nerve transfers and pacemaker implantation can result in reinnervation of the diaphragm and lead to successful ventilator weaning. Our favorable outcomes support consideration of this surgical method for appropriate patients who would otherwise have no alternative therapy to achieve sustained periods of ventilator independence. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Authors: Syed A Quadri; Mudassir Farooqui; Asad Ikram; Atif Zafar; Muhammad Adnan Khan; Sajid S Suriya; Chad F Claus; Brian Fiani; Mohammed Rahman; Anirudh Ramachandran; Ian I T Armstrong; Muhammad A Taqi; Martin M Mortazavi Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Matthew R Kaufman; Thomas Bauer; Raymond P Onders; David P Brown; Eric I Chang; Kristie Rossi; Andrew I Elkwood; Ethan Paulin; Reza Jarrahy Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2021-05-10
Authors: Eric Verin; Capucine Morelot-Panzini; Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo; Benoit Veber; Brigitte Perrouin Verbe; Brigitte Soudrie; Anne Marie Leroi; Jean Paul Marie; Thomas Similowski Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2017-11-20
Authors: Matthew R Kaufman; Thomas Bauer; Stuart Campbell; Kristie Rossi; Andrew Elkwood; Reza Jarrahy Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.040