Literature DB >> 25867615

Central and peripheral vision loss differentially affects contextual cueing in visual search.

Franziska Geringswald1, Stefan Pollmann2.   

Abstract

Visual search for targets in repeated displays is more efficient than search for the same targets in random distractor layouts. Previous work has shown that this contextual cueing is severely impaired under central vision loss. Here, we investigated whether central vision loss, simulated with gaze-contingent displays, prevents the incidental learning of contextual cues or the expression of learning, that is, the guidance of search by learned target-distractor configurations. Visual search with a central scotoma reduced contextual cueing both with respect to search times and gaze parameters. However, when the scotoma was subsequently removed, contextual cueing was observed in a comparable magnitude as for controls who had searched without scotoma simulation throughout the experiment. This indicated that search with a central scotoma did not prevent incidental context learning, but interfered with search guidance by learned contexts. We discuss the role of visuospatial working memory load as source of this interference. In contrast to central vision loss, peripheral vision loss was expected to prevent spatial configuration learning itself, because the restricted search window did not allow the integration of invariant local configurations with the global display layout. This expectation was confirmed in that visual search with a simulated peripheral scotoma eliminated contextual cueing not only in the initial learning phase with scotoma, but also in the subsequent test phase without scotoma. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25867615     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

Review 1.  Raising awareness about measurement error in research on unconscious mental processes.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Simone Malejka; Daryl Y H Lee; Zoltan Dienes; David R Shanks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  Using eye movements to detect visual field loss: a pragmatic assessment using simulated scotoma.

Authors:  Daniel S Asfaw; Pete R Jones; Laura A Edwards; Nicholas D Smith; David P Crabb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Effect of Magnification and Contrast on Reading Performance in Different Types of Simulated Low Vision.

Authors:  Michael Christen; Mathias Abegg
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 0.957

4.  Influences of luminance contrast and ambient lighting on visual context learning and retrieval.

Authors:  Xuelian Zang; Lingyun Huang; Xiuna Zhu; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Preserved Contextual Cueing in Realistic Scenes in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Lisa Rosenblum; Stefanie Linnhoff; Eleonora Porracin; Franziska Geringswald; Anne Herbik; Katja Renner; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-12-07

6.  Simulated central vision loss does not impair implicit location probability learning when participants search through simple displays.

Authors:  Douglas A Addleman; Vanessa G Lee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Intact Contextual Cueing for Search in Realistic Scenes with Simulated Central or Peripheral Vision Loss.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Franziska Geringswald; Ping Wei; Eleonora Porracin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.