Literature DB >> 25867178

Natural and Synthetic Materials for Self-Renewal, Long-Term Maintenance, and Differentiation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Nina A Dzhoyashvili1,2, Sanbing Shen3,4, Yury A Rochev1,2.   

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have attracted considerable attention from the public, clinicians, and scientists since their discovery in 2006, and raised huge expectations for regenerative medicine. One of the distinctive features of iPSCs is their propensity to differentiate into the cells of three germ lines in vitro and in vivo. The human iPSCs can be used to study the mechanisms underlying a disease and to monitor the disease progression, for testing drugs in vitro, and for cell therapy, avoiding many ethical and immunologic concerns. This technology offers the potential to take an individual approach to each patient and allows a more accurate diagnosis and specific treatment. However, there are several obstacles that impede the use of iPSCs. The derivation of fully reprogrammed iPSCs is expensive, time-consuming, and demands meticulous attention to many details. The use of biomaterials could increase the efficacy and safety while decreasing the cost of tissue engineering. The choice of a substrate utilized for iPSC culture is also important because cell-substrate contacts influence cellular behavior such as self-renewal, expansion, and differentiation. This Progress Report aims to summarize the advantages and drawbacks of natural and synthetic biomaterials, and to evaluate their role for maintenance and differentiation of iPSCs.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; differentiation; induced pluripotent stem cells; self-renewal; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25867178     DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201400798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  8 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Hydrogel Microenvironments to Recapitulate the Stem Cell Niche.

Authors:  Christopher M Madl; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 2.  Biomaterials as a Vital Frontier for Stem Cell-Based Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Ahmed Nugud; Latifa Alghfeli; Moustafa Elmasry; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Ahmed T El-Serafi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 3.  Controlled drug release for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kunal J Rambhia; Peter X Ma
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Cartilage Tissue Engineering by the 3D Bioprinting of iPS Cells in a Nanocellulose/Alginate Bioink.

Authors:  Duong Nguyen; Daniel A Hägg; Alma Forsman; Josefine Ekholm; Puwapong Nimkingratana; Camilla Brantsing; Theodoros Kalogeropoulos; Samantha Zaunz; Sebastian Concaro; Mats Brittberg; Anders Lindahl; Paul Gatenholm; Annika Enejder; Stina Simonsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  A State-of-the-Art of Functional Scaffolds for 3D Nervous Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Tupone; Michele d'Angelo; Vanessa Castelli; Mariano Catanesi; Elisabetta Benedetti; Annamaria Cimini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-18

6.  Synthesis of scaffold-free, three dimensional, osteogenic constructs following culture of skeletal osteoprogenitor cells on glass surfaces.

Authors:  Latifa Alghfeli; Divyasree Parambath; Shaista Manzoor; Helmtrud I Roach; Richard O C Oreffo; Ahmed T El-Serafi
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-10-18

7.  A chemically-defined plastic scaffold for the xeno-free production of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Eiko Shimizu; Hiroki Iguchi; Minh Nguyen Tuyet Le; Yuta Nakamura; Daigo Kobayashi; Yuhei Arai; Kenta Takakura; Seiko Benno; Noriko Yoshida; Masayoshi Tsukahara; Satoshi Haneda; Kouichi Hasegawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Maintenance of neural progenitor cell stemness in 3D hydrogels requires matrix remodelling.

Authors:  Christopher M Madl; Bauer L LeSavage; Ruby E Dewi; Cong B Dinh; Ryan S Stowers; Margarita Khariton; Kyle J Lampe; Duong Nguyen; Ovijit Chaudhuri; Annika Enejder; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 43.841

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.