Literature DB >> 25867038

Low-frequency ultrasound debridement in patients with diabetic foot ulcers and osteomyelitis.

Sareh Amini1, Abolfazl ShojaeeFard2, Zohreh Annabestani1, Mohsen Rezaie Hammami1, Zahra Shaiganmehr1, Bagher Larijani1, Shahrzad Mohseni1, Hamid Reza Afshani3, Maryam Aboee Rad1, Mohammad Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although debridement plays a significant role in the healing of diabetic foot ulcers, it may delay the healing process by damaging the granulation tissue. In this study, the efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound (LFU) in chronic wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers in patients with osteomyelitis was evaluated.
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 patients with diabetes recruited from the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Clinic of the Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. All patients with a grade 3 ulcer (Wagner Classification) with 0.6 ≤ ankle brachial index ≤ 1.2, were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups; 1 group received ultrasound-assisted wound therapy (UAW) in conjunction with standard wound care (n = 20) and the control group received only standard wound care. Patients were followed for 6 months.
RESULTS: The complete healing rate in the study population was 55.7% (control group = 55%, UAW group = 60%). The mean wound size reduction percentage was significantly higher in the UAW group only in the second month (78% ± 28.7 vs 55.7% ± 31.4, P = 0.01) and third month (63.6% ± 24.5 vs 39.3% ± 32.2 , P = 0.02) of follow up, but not at 6 months.
CONCLUSION: In grade 3 diabetic foot ulcers, LFU debridement accompanied by standard wound care can initially accelerate ulcer healing; however, there is no significant difference between the 2 modalities in the healing rate after 6 months. .

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25867038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wounds        ISSN: 1044-7946            Impact factor:   1.546


  10 in total

1.  Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers: public health and clinical implications - a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Authors:  David Dayya; Owen O'Neill; Nusrat Habib; Joanna Moore; Kartik Iyer; Tania B Huedo-Medina
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  The effect of 22.5 kHz low-frequency contact ultrasound debridement (LFCUD) on lower extremity wound healing for a vascular surgery population: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine Anne Murphy; Pamela Houghton; Tim Brandys; Gregory Rose; Dianne Bryant
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Healing rates in diabetes-related foot ulcers using low frequency ultrasonic debridement versus non-surgical sharps debridement: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucia Michailidis; Shan M Bergin; Terry P Haines; Cylie M Williams
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Ultrasonic debridement with stem cell therapy of suspensory branch desmitis in an equine patient.

Authors:  Srinath Kamineni; Alan Ruggles; Hamza Ashfaq
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2019-03-12

5.  Strong association of anemia in people with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): Study from a specialist foot care center.

Authors:  Abdul Majid Shareef; Muhammad Yakoob Ahmedani; Nazish Waris
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 6.  Ultrasound-Assisted Wound (UAW) Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastián Flores-Escobar; Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso; Yolanda García-Álvarez; Mateo López-Moral; José Luis Lázaro-Martínez; Esther García-Morales
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Wound debridement products and techniques: clinical examples and literature review.

Authors:  Marcela Nowak; Dorota Mehrholz; Wioletta Barańska-Rybak; Roman J Nowicki
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  Advances in the Sensing and Treatment of Wound Biofilms.

Authors:  Sorour Darvishi; Shima Tavakoli; Mahshid Kharaziha; Hubert H Girault; Clemens F Kaminski; Ioanna Mela
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.823

Review 9.  Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Robert G Frykberg; Jaminelli Banks
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated therapies for the treatment of biofilms in chronic wounds: a review of present knowledge.

Authors:  Gareth LuTheryn; Peter Glynne-Jones; Jeremy S Webb; Dario Carugo
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.