| Literature DB >> 25866778 |
Abdoulaye Ba1, Fabienne Brégeon2, Stéphane Delliaux2, Fallou Cissé3, Abdoulaye Samb4, Yves Jammes2.
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary response to unloaded cycling may be related to higher workloads. This was assessed in male subjects: 18 healthy sedentary subjects (controls), 14 hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 31 overweight individuals (twelve were hypoxemic). They underwent an incremental exercise up to the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), preceded by a 2 min unloaded cycling period. Oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory frequency (fR) were averaged every 10 s. At the end of unloaded cycling period, HR increase was significantly accentuated in COPD and hypoxemic overweight subjects (resp., +14 ± 2 and +13 ± 1.5 min(-1), compared to +7.5 ± 1.5 min(-1) in normoxemic overweight subjects and +8 ± 1.8 min(-1) in controls). The fR increase was accentuated in all overweight subjects (hypoxemic: +4.5 ± 0.8; normoxemic: +3.9 ± 0.7 min(-1)) compared to controls (+2.5 ± 0.8 min(-1)) and COPDs (+2.0 ± 0.7 min(-1)). The plateau VE increase during unloaded cycling was positively correlated with VE values measured at the ventilatory threshold and VO2max. Measurement of ventilation during unloaded cycling may serve to predict the ventilatory performance of COPD patients and overweight subjects during an exercise rehabilitation program.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25866778 PMCID: PMC4383510 DOI: 10.1155/2015/378469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Morphological characteristics, physiological data at rest, and oxygen uptake at the different epochs of exercise. Asterisks denote significant variations compared to controls (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001). For pulmonary function, values in brackets are the percentage of predicted normal data.
| Controls | COPDs | Overweight subjects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxemic | Normoxemic | |||
| Number | 18 | 14 | 12 | 19 |
| Age, y | 49 ± 6 | 54 ± 4 | 55 ± 2 | 53 ± 3 |
| Body mass index, kg·m−2 | 23 ± 1.0 | 24 ± 1.5 | 31 ± 2.0** | 29.4 ± 2.2* |
| Forced vital capacity (FVC), | 4.54 ± 0.39 | 3.56 ± 0.20 | 3.79 ± 0.36*
| 4.12 ± 0.50 |
| Expiratory reserve volume (ERV), lBTPS | 1.37 ± 0.20 | 1.03 ± 0.15 | 0.72 ± 0.35* | 0.86 ± 0.25 |
| Total lung capacity (TLC), | 6.72 ± 0.39 | 6.45 ± 0.34 | 5.81 ± 0.36*
| 5.92 ± 0.31*
|
| Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), lBTPS (% predicted) | 3.89 ± 0.33 | 2.38 ± 0.25**
| 3.18 ± 0.23 | 3.27 ± 0.18 |
| FEV1/FVC, % | 86 | 67 | 84 | 79 |
| PaO2 | 85 | 67*** | 72* | 85 |
| SpO2, % | 99 ± 0.8 | 95 ± 0.6 | 96 ± 0.5 | 99 ± 0.7 |
| Heart rate, min−1 | 72 ± 3 | 81 ± 5 | 69 ± 4 | 77 ± 3 |
| Minute ventilation (VE), | 11 | 11 | 10 | 13 |
| Respiratory frequency (fR), min−1 | 16 | 18 | 15 | 17 |
| Oxygen uptake (VO2), | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.3 |
| VO2 end unloaded cycling | 8.1 ± 0.4 | 8.2 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.4 |
| VO2 threshold | 21.2 ± 1.0 | 16.2 ± 0.9** | 15.2 ± 1.4** | 18.4 ± 0.8* |
Figure 1The changes in cardiorespiratory variables, related to their corresponding resting levels, during the 2 min period of unloaded cycling exercise in the four groups. Normoxemic and hypoxemic subjects are identified by black and open symbols, respectively. Up to down: heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), respiratory frequency (fR), and tidal volume (VT). Values are mean ± SEM. Asterisks denote the first significant change (* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01). All further variations were significant (**).
Figure 2Relationships between minute ventilation measured at the ventilatory threshold (VE threshold) and maximal oxygen uptake (VEmax) during an incremental cycling exercise and the maximal VE changes measured at 120 s of unloaded cycling exercise. All subjects were pooled together for this analysis. Regression line with 95% confidence intervals.