Literature DB >> 25866032

Long-term safety and performance of the orbital atherectomy system for treating calcified coronary artery lesions: 5-Year follow-up in the ORBIT I trial.

Parloop Bhatt1, Parth Parikh1, Apurva Patel2, Milan Chag1, Anish Chandarana1, Roosha Parikh2, Keyur Parikh3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: The ORBIT I trial, a first-in-man study, was conducted to evaluate the safety and performance of the orbital atherectomy system (OAS) in treating de novo calcified coronary lesions. METHODS/MATERIALS: Fifty patients were enrolled between May and July 2008 based on several criteria, and were treated with the OAS followed by stent placement. The safety and performance of the OAS were evaluated by procedural success, device success, and overall major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and need for target lesion revascularization (TLR). Our institution enrolled and treated 33 of the 50 patients and continued follow-up for 5 years.
RESULTS: Average age was 54 years and 91% were males. Mean lesion length was 15.9 mm. Device success was 100%, and average number of orbital atherectomy devices (OAD) used per patient was 1.3. Stents were placed directly after OAS in 31/32 patients (96.9%). All stents (average stent per lesion 1.1) were successfully deployed with 0.3% residual stenosis. The overall cumulative MACE rate was 6.1% in-hospital, 9.1% at 30 days, 12.1% at 6 months, 15.2% at 2 years, 18.2% at 3 years and 21.2% at 5 years (4 total cardiac deaths). None of the patients had Q-wave MIs. Angiographic complications were observed in 5 patients. No flow/slow flow due to distal embolization was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The ORBIT I trial suggests that OAS treatment continues to offer a safe and effective method to change compliance of calcified coronary lesions to facilitate optimal stent placement in these difficult-to-treat patients.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; De novo calcified coronary lesions; Orbital atherectomy; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25866032     DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  8 in total

1.  Novel Use of an Orbital Atherectomy Device for In-Stent Restenosis: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  K Shaikh; S Kelly; M Gedela; V Kumar; A Stys; T Stys
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-15

2.  Orbital Atherectomy and Heavily Calcified Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention.

Authors:  Maheedhar Gedela; Shenjing Li; Udit Bhatnagar; Adam Stys; Tomasz Stys
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Patient Selection and Procedural Considerations for Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System.

Authors:  Yohei Sotomi; Richard A Shlofmitz; Antonio Colombo; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

4.  Active matter therapeutics.

Authors:  Arijit Ghosh; Weinan Xu; Neha Gupta; David H Gracias
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 20.722

Review 5.  Calcific lesion preparation for coronary bifurcation stenting.

Authors:  Matteo Perfetti; Fabio Fulgenzi; Francesco Radico; Alessandro Toro; Antonio Procopio; Nicola Maddestra; Marco Zimarino
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 6.  Interventional Options for Coronary Artery Calcification.

Authors:  Matthew I Tomey; Samin K Sharma
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  The successful use of autologous skin in management of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation.

Authors:  Ruiwei Guo; Lixia Yang
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-12

Review 8.  Contemporary tools and devices for coronary calcium modification.

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Margaret McEntegart
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-04-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.