Literature DB >> 25865761

Temporal Differences in Causes of Mortality After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

John M Stulak1, Vivek Mehta2, John A Schirger3, Keith D Aaronson4, Lyle D Joyce5, Richard C Daly5, Francis D Pagani2, Simon Maltais6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of device-related adverse events leading to death is abundant and ever-present after left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Very few data specifically examine the causes of death related to length of time after VAD implantation.
METHODS: Between October 2004 and February 2013, 493 patients (395 male, 80%) underwent primary continuous-flow VAD implantation at our institutions. The median age at implantation was 60 years (range, 18-79 years), and 301 patients (62%) underwent bridge to transplantation.
RESULTS: Follow-up was available for all patients (median, 13 months) for a total of 717 patient-years of support. There were 132 deaths during follow-up (median, 8 months; early, 5.5 years) after VAD implantation. The patients were grouped according to temporal occurrence of deaths: (1) early (30-day or index hospitalization) in 34 of 132 patients (26%), (2) between hospital dismissal and 6 months in 29 of 132 patients (22%), (3) 6 months to 1 year in 14 of 132 patients (11%), and (4) after 1 year in 55 of 132 patients (42%). The causes of death (%) at each time period are presented; the most common early cause was right ventricular failure/multisystem organ failure in 18 of 34 patients (61%); from dismissal to 6 months, and 6 months to 1 year, cerebral hemorrhage in 6 of 29 patients (21%) and 4 of 14 patients (29%), respectively; after 1 year, cerebral hemorrhage in 12 of 55 patients (22%) and right ventricular failure/multisystem organ failure in 11 of 55 patients (20%).
CONCLUSIONS: The causes of death vary according to time after VAD implantation. Understanding the temporal relationship of causes of mortality after VAD implantation is critical to the identification of varying specific risks in an effort to avoid morbidity, which may ultimately detract from a durable VAD outcome.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25865761     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Dying With a Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Jacob J Strand; Sara E Wordingham; John M Stulak; Angela J Luckhardt; Keith M Swetz
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Is there a difference in bleeding after left ventricular assist device implant: centrifugal versus axial?

Authors:  Ann C Gaffey; Carol W Chen; Jennifer J Chung; Jason Han; Christian A Bermudez; Joyce Wald; Pavan Atluri
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 3.  In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Radoslav Zinoviev; Christopher K Lippincott; Sara C Keller; Nisha A Gilotra
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Effect of levosimendan infusion prior to left ventricular assist device implantation on right ventricular failure.

Authors:  Amitai Segev; Jacob Lavee; Yigal Kassif; Yedida Shemesh; Alexander Kogan; Dov Freimark; Avi Morgan; Dor Lotan; Edward Itelman; Avishay Grupper
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Development of tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular performance after implantation of centrifugal left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Johanna Mulzer; Hristo Krastev; Christoph Hoermandinger; Alexander Meyer; Thomas Haese; Julia Stein; Marcus Müller; Felix Schoenrath; Christoph Knosalla; Christoph Starck; Volkmar Falk; Evgenij Potapov; Jan Knierim
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.