OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT® 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p≤0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17±0.12 (BBH) and 0.10±0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41±0.32 (BBH) and 0.12±0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT® 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p≤0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17±0.12 (BBH) and 0.10±0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41±0.32 (BBH) and 0.12±0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.
Authors: Alexander Gröbe; Jan Semmusch; Maximilian Schöllchen; Henning Hanken; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Eichhorn; Gerhard Schön; Ole Jung; Jamal M Stein; Aline Reitmeier; Max Heiland; Ralf Smeets; Clarissa Precht Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Andreas Hellak; Nicola Schmidt; Michael Schauseil; Steffen Stein; Thomas Drechsler; Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Andreas Hellak; Nicola Schmidt; Michael Schauseil; Steffen Stein; Thomas Drechsler; Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 2.757