Literature DB >> 25865475

Effect of Protocolized Sedation on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Mahad A Minhas1, Adrian G Velasquez2, Anubhav Kaul3, Pedro D Salinas4, Leo A Celi5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of protocolized sedation (algorithm or daily interruption) compared with usual care without protocolized sedation on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to February 28, 2013. A random-effects model was used to synthesize risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs).
RESULTS: Of 4782 records screened, 6 RCTs including 1243 patients met the inclusion criteria. Protocolized sedation was associated with significant reductions in overall mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97; P=.02; number needed to treat, 20; P=.11), ICU length of stay (WMD, -1.73 days; 95% CI, -3.32 to -0.14 days; P=.03), hospital length of stay (WMD, -3.55 days; 95% CI, -5.98 to -1.12 days; P=.004), and tracheostomy (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.96; P=.03; number needed to treat, 16.6; P=.04; 5 RCTs) compared with usual care. Protocolized sedation produced no significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD, -1.04 days; 95% CI, -2.54 to 0.47 days; P=.18), reintubation (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.15; P=.21; 3 RCTs), and self-extubation (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.46 to 4.82; P=.51; 4 RCTs) compared with usual care. Included studies did not report delirium incidence.
CONCLUSION: In mechanically ventilated adults in closed, nonspecialty ICUs, protocolized sedation seems to decrease overall mortality (15%), ICU and hospital lengths of stay (1.73 and 3.55 days, respectively), and tracheostomy (31%) compared with usual care without protocolized sedation.
Copyright © 2015 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25865475      PMCID: PMC6469349          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  12 in total

1.  ATS Core Curriculum 2016: Part II. Adult Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Jakob I McSparron; Margaret M Hayes; Jason T Poston; Carey C Thomson; Henry E Fessler; Renee D Stapleton; W Graham Carlos; Laura Hinkle; Kathleen Liu; Stephanie Shieh; Alyan Ali; Angela Rogers; Nirav G Shah; Donald Slack; Bhakti Patel; Krysta Wolfe; William D Schweickert; Rita N Bakhru; Stephanie Shin; Rebecca E Sell; Andrew M Luks
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-05

2.  Identification and validation of distinct biological phenotypes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by cluster analysis.

Authors:  L D Bos; L R Schouten; L A van Vught; M A Wiewel; D S Y Ong; O Cremer; A Artigas; I Martin-Loeches; A J Hoogendijk; T van der Poll; J Horn; N Juffermans; C S Calfee; M J Schultz
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Pediatric Delirium: Recognition, Management, and Outcome.

Authors:  Susan Beckwitt Turkel
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Comparison of sedation strategies for critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Lisa D Burry; Salmaan Kanji; Sangeeta Mehta; Melanie Guenette; Claudio M Martin; Dean A Fergusson; Neill K Adhikari; Ingrid Egerod; David Williamson; Sharon Straus; David Moher; E Wesley Ely; Louise Rose
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

5.  Sedation protocols versus daily sedation interruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Paulo Nassar; Marcelo Park
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Organizational factors associated with target sedation on the first 48 h of mechanical ventilation: an analysis of checklist-ICU database.

Authors:  Antonio Paulo Nassar; Fernando G Zampieri; Jorge I Salluh; Fernando A Bozza; Flávia Ribeiro Machado; Helio Penna Guimarães; Lucas P Damiani; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  "Having the compass-drawing the map": Exploring nurses' management of pain and other discomforts during use of analgosedation in intensive care.

Authors:  Helene Berntzen; Ida Torunn Bjørk; Hilde Wøien
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-12-18

8.  Clinical Impact of an Electronic Dashboard and Alert System for Sedation Minimization and Ventilator Liberation: A Before-After Study.

Authors:  Brian J Anderson; David Do; Corey Chivers; Katherine Choi; Yevgeniy Gitelman; Shivan J Mehta; Venkat Panchandam; Steve Gudowski; Margie Pierce; Maurizio Cereda; Jason D Christie; William D Schweickert; Andrea Gabrielli; Ann Huffenberger; Mike Draugelis; Barry D Fuchs
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2019-10-30

9.  Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry in the critically ill: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Petr Waldauf; Jan Gojda; Tomáš Urban; Natália Hrušková; Barbora Blahutová; Marie Hejnová; Kateřina Jiroutková; Michal Fric; Pavel Jánský; Jana Kukulová; Francis Stephens; Kamila Řasová; František Duška
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Yahya Shehabi; Timothy S Walsh; Pratik P Pandharipande; Jonathan A Ball; Peter Spronk; Dan Longrois; Thomas Strøm; Giorgio Conti; Georg-Christian Funk; Rafael Badenes; Jean Mantz; Claudia Spies; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.