Literature DB >> 25865434

Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.

Kenneth Hung1, Jane Gralla2,3, Jennifer L Dodge4, Kiran M Bambha1, Melisa Dirchwolf5, Hugo R Rosen1, Scott W Biggins1.   

Abstract

Repeat liver transplantation (LT) is controversial because of inferior outcomes versus primary LT. A minimum 1-year expected post-re-LT survival of 50% has been proposed. We aimed to identify combinations of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), donor risk index (DRI), and recipient characteristics achieving this graft survival threshold. We identified re-LT recipients listed in the United States from March 2002 to January 2010 with > 90 days between primary LT and listing for re-LT. Using Cox regression, we estimated the expected probability of 1-year graft survival and identified combinations of MELD, DRI, and recipient characteristics attaining >50% expected 1-year graft survival. Re-LT recipients (n = 1418) had a median MELD of 26 and median age of 52 years. Expected 1-year graft survival exceeded 50% regardless of MELD or DRI in Caucasian recipients who were not infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of all ages and Caucasian HCV-infected recipients <50 years old. As age increased in HCV-infected Caucasian and non-HCV-infected African American recipients, lower MELD scores or lower DRI grafts were needed to attain the graft survival threshold. As MELD scores increased in HCV-infected African American recipients, lower-DRI livers were required to achieve the graft survival threshold. Use of high-DRI livers (>1.44) in HCV-infected recipients with a MELD score > 26 at re-LT failed to achieve the graft survival threshold with recipient age ≥ 60 years (any race), as well as at age ≥ 50 years for Caucasians and at age < 50 years for African Americans. Strategic donor selection can achieve >50% expected 1-year graft survival even in high-risk re-LT recipients (HCV infected, older age, African American race, high MELD scores). Low-risk transplant recipients (age < 50 years, non-HCV-infected) can achieve the survival threshold with varying DRI and MELD scores.
© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25865434     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  2 in total

Review 1.  Normothermic Machine Perfusion-Improving the Supply of Transplantable Livers for High-Risk Recipients.

Authors:  Angus Hann; Anisa Nutu; George Clarke; Ishaan Patel; Dimitri Sneiders; Ye H Oo; Hermien Hartog; M Thamara P R Perera
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  Quantifying the Effect of Transplanting Older Donor Livers Into Younger Recipients: The Need for Donor-recipient Age Matching.

Authors:  Therese Bittermann; David S Goldberg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.939

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.