Literature DB >> 25863890

What is the Fate of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Acetabular Component Orientation When Evaluated in the Standing Position?

John V Tiberi1, Valentin Antoci1, Henrik Malchau1, Harry E Rubash1, Andrew A Freiberg1, Young-Min Kwon1.   

Abstract

This retrospective study measured the change of the acetabular component orientation between supine and standing radiographs in 113 THA patients and identified the associated anatomical parameters that may help direct pre-operative planning. The mean change of the acetabular component inclination and version from supine to standing was 4.6° and 5.9° respectively (P<0.0001), with 49 (43%) hips showing inclination change >5° and 69 (53%) hips showing version change >5°. Twelve (43%) of 28 'malpositioned' cups became 'well-positioned' and 26 (31%) of 85 'well-positioned' cups became 'malpositioned' upon standing. Changes in inclination were associated with leg length discrepancy and pelvic obliquity; and changes in version were associated with pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence. Standing position and patient factors should be considered when defining "optimal" acetabular orientation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOS X-ray imaging Acquisition System; acetabular cup position; safe zone; standing; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863890     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.

Authors:  William S Murphy; Ho Hyun Yun; Brett Hayden; Jens H Kowal; Stephen B Murphy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Sagittal Pelvic Kinematics in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas E Niemeier; Brad W Wills; Steven M Theiss; Shane F Strom
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

3.  [Comparative study of intra- and post-operative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular cup in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  Run Tian; Yutian Lei; Kunzheng Wang; Pei Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 4.  Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kurt G Seagrave; Anders Troelsen; Henrik Malchau; Henrik Husted; Kirill Gromov
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Long-term results of the M2A-38-mm metal-on-metal articulation.

Authors:  Carlo Trevisan; Stefano Piscitello; Raymond Klumpp; Tonino Mascitti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-07

6.  Well-Placed Acetabular Component Oriented Outside the Safe Zone During Weight-Bearing Daily Activities.

Authors:  Nan Zheng; Xiangjun Hu; Dimitris Dimitriou; Kerong Dai; Tao Guo; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-10

7.  Validation of a Novel Software Measurement Tool for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Muir; Kelly A Foley; Karlina Fiaes; Justin B Wagler; Milena Galaszewicz; Jessica R Benson; Michael P Bradley
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-09

8.  EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations.

Authors:  Elias Melhem; Ayman Assi; Rami El Rachkidi; Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Evaluation of Tilt-correction of Anteversion on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Muir; John Vincent; Joseph Schipper; Meinusha Govindarajan; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-18

10.  The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Widmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.