Literature DB >> 25863647

Towards a framework for evaluating and grading evidence in public health.

Thomas Harder1, Muna Abu Sin2, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch3, Helena de Carvalho Gomes4, Phillippe Duclos5, Tim Eckmanns2, Randy Elder6, Simon Ellis7, Frode Forland8, Paul Garner9, Roberta James10, Andreas Jansen4, Gérard Krause11, Daniel Lévy-Bruhl12, Antony Morgan7, Joerg J Meerpohl13, Susan Norris5, Eva Rehfuess14, Alex Sánchez-Vivar15, Holger Schünemann16, Anja Takla2, Ole Wichmann2, Walter Zingg17, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak18.   

Abstract

The Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT) is an international collaboration of public health institutes and universities which has been funded by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) since 2012. Main objective is to define a framework for evaluating and grading evidence in the field of public health, with particular focus on infectious disease prevention and control. As part of the peer review process, an international expert meeting was held on 13-14 June 2013 in Berlin. Participants were members of the PRECEPT team and selected experts from national public health institutes, World Health Organization (WHO), and academic institutions. The aim of the meeting was to discuss the draft framework and its application to two examples from infectious disease prevention and control. This article introduces the draft PRECEPT framework and reports on the meeting, its structure, most relevant discussions and major conclusions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based health care; GRADE; Infectious diseases; PRECEPT; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863647     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  10 in total

1.  Revision of the Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol.

Authors:  Katherine M Conigrave; Robert L Ali; Rebecca Armstrong; Tanya N Chikritzhs; Peter d'Abbs; Mark F Harris; Nicole Hewlett; Michael Livingston; Dan I Lubman; Anne McKenzie; Colleen O'Leary; Alison Ritter; Scott Wilson; Melanie Grimmond; Emily Banks
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 12.776

2.  Improving health promotion through central rating of interventions: the need for Responsive Guidance.

Authors:  Maarten Olivier Kok; Roland Bal; Caspar David Roelofs; Albertine Jantine Schuit
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-11-23

3.  Predicting late-onset sepsis by routine neonatal screening for colonisation by gram-negative bacteria in neonates at intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Harder; Juliane Seidel; Tim Eckmanns; Bettina Weiss; Sebastian Haller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Use of existing systematic reviews for evidence assessments in infectious disease prevention: a comparative case study.

Authors:  Thomas Harder; Cornelius Remschmidt; Sebastian Haller; Tim Eckmanns; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-11

5.  Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.

Authors:  Michele Hilton Boon; Hilary Thomson; Beth Shaw; Elie A Akl; Stefan K Lhachimi; Jesús López-Alcalde; Miloslav Klugar; Leslie Choi; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Reem A Mustafa; Miranda W Langendam; Olivia Crane; Rebecca L Morgan; Eva Rehfuess; Bradley C Johnston; Lee Yee Chong; Gordon H Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 7.407

6.  The effectiveness of syndromic surveillance for the early detection of waterborne outbreaks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susanne Hyllestad; Ettore Amato; Karin Nygård; Line Vold; Preben Aavitsland
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  PRECEPT: an evidence assessment framework for infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control.

Authors:  Thomas Harder; Anja Takla; Tim Eckmanns; Simon Ellis; Frode Forland; Roberta James; Joerg J Meerpohl; Antony Morgan; Eva Rehfuess; Holger Schünemann; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak; Helena de Carvalho Gomes; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2017-10

8.  Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development.

Authors:  Sietse Wieringa; Dunja Dreesens; Frode Forland; Carel Hulshof; Sue Lukersmith; Fergus Macbeth; Beth Shaw; Arlène van Vliet; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 9.  Rating the quality of a body of evidence on the effectiveness of health and social interventions: A systematic review and mapping of evidence domains.

Authors:  Ani Movsisyan; Jane Dennis; Eva Rehfuess; Sean Grant; Paul Montgomery
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.273

10.  The effectiveness of the quality improvement collaborative strategy in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ezequiel Garcia-Elorrio; Samantha Y Rowe; Maria E Teijeiro; Agustín Ciapponi; Alexander K Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.