Xiao-yan Yi1, Qi-fu Li1, Jun Zhang2, Zhi-hong Wang3. 1. Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 2. Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 3. Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: towzh713@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effects of bariatric surgery (BS) on outcomes in subsequent pregnancies are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes among women who become pregnant after BS and obese women who have not undergone BS before pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant reports, and the reference lists of identified articles were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort studies that compared outcomes among women who had undergone any type of BS and obese women who had not undergone surgery were included when results were reported as risk ratios or odds ratios (ORs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Summary ORs were estimated using a random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Compared with obese women who had not undergone BS, women who had undergone BS had significantly lower odds of gestational diabetes (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15-0.65), hypertensive disorders (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23-0.78), and macrosomia (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24-0.67). However, their odds of small-for-gestational-age newborns were increased (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.28-3.66). No significant differences were recorded for cesarean, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: BS reduces the odds of some adverse maternal and fetal outcomes among obese women.
BACKGROUND: The effects of bariatric surgery (BS) on outcomes in subsequent pregnancies are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes among women who become pregnant after BS and obesewomen who have not undergone BS before pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant reports, and the reference lists of identified articles were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort studies that compared outcomes among women who had undergone any type of BS and obesewomen who had not undergone surgery were included when results were reported as risk ratios or odds ratios (ORs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Summary ORs were estimated using a random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Compared with obesewomen who had not undergone BS, women who had undergone BS had significantly lower odds of gestational diabetes (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15-0.65), hypertensive disorders (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23-0.78), and macrosomia (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24-0.67). However, their odds of small-for-gestational-age newborns were increased (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.28-3.66). No significant differences were recorded for cesarean, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: BS reduces the odds of some adverse maternal and fetal outcomes among obesewomen.
Authors: Judith Stephenson; Nicola Heslehurst; Jennifer Hall; Danielle A J M Schoenaker; Jayne Hutchinson; Janet E Cade; Lucilla Poston; Geraldine Barrett; Sarah R Crozier; Mary Barker; Kalyanaraman Kumaran; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Janis Baird; Gita D Mishra Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Heidi Dutton; Sarah Jean Borengasser; Laura Marie Gaudet; Linda A Barbour; Erin Joanne Keely Journal: Med Clin North Am Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 5.456
Authors: Seda Sancak; Özgen Çeler; Elif Çırak; Aziz Bora Karip; M Tumiçin Aydın; Nuriye Esen Bulut; M Mahir Fersahoğlu; Hasan Altun; Kemal Memişoğlu Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.129