| Literature DB >> 25863425 |
Xiaowen Ge1, Haixing Wang1, Haiying Zeng1, Xuejuan Jin2, Akesu Sujie1, Chen Xu1, Yalan Liu1, Jie Huang1, Yuan Ji1, Yunshan Tan1, Tianshu Liu3, Yingyong Hou4, Jing Qin5, Yihong Sun6, Xinyu Qin6.
Abstract
One paraffin block is routinely used for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/neu) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment. Here, we investigated if picking 2 paraffin blocks for Her2/neu evaluation on 1 slide is an economical, efficient, and practical method, which may reduce false negativity of Her2/neu IHC assessment due to intratumoral heterogeneity. A total of 251 gastric cancer (GC) patients were divided into a cohort using 1 tumor tissue paraffin block (single-block group, n = 132) and a cohort using dual tumor tissue paraffin blocks (dual-block group, n = 119) when evaluating Her2/neu expression status by IHC. In dual-block group, we combined the results from 2 different paraffin blocks and used the higher one as the final score. The number of IHC 1+, 2+, and 3+ specimens in the single-block group was 31 (23.5%), 40 (30.3%), and 19 (14.4%), respectively. The combined final IHC score in the dual-block group of 1+, 2+, and 3+ was 26 (21.8%), 34 (28.6%), and 23 (19.3%), respectively. Inconsistent Her2/neu expression between blocks was found in 36 (30.3%) cases in the dual-block group. The pooled data in the single-block group and the dual-block group indicated that, when using dual blocks, the Her2/neu-positive (3+) rate of GC was higher compared to that in the single-block group. Our results implied that using dual paraffin blocks to assess Her2/neu expression of GC may help identify more patients with Her2/neu-positive GC who could benefit from targeted therapy, by reducing false-negative rate of Her2 status assessment. This is an efficient, economical, and practical method for Her2/neu evaluation of GC.Entities:
Keywords: Dual paraffin blocks; Gastric cancer; Her2/neu; Immunohistochemistry; Trastuzumab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25863425 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.02.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Pathol ISSN: 0046-8177 Impact factor: 3.466