Literature DB >> 2586273

Treatment for offender patients: how should success be measured?

G Robertson.   

Abstract

The criteria used to judge the success of treatment for mentally ill (psychotic) patients are the same for offenders and non-offenders. For those offender patients detained as psychopaths, the incremental validity of the medical concept is dubious and recourse is often made to the use of the criminal criterion of reconviction in order to measure therapeutic effectiveness. One such study is reported here and others are reviewed. It is argued that reconviction is not a valid measure of psychiatric treatment and that the criteria used to judge therapeutic effectiveness in forensic psychiatry should not differ from those used in all other forms of psychiatric care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2586273     DOI: 10.1177/002580248902900408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Law        ISSN: 0025-8024            Impact factor:   1.266


  2 in total

1.  The utility of the Historical Clinical Risk-20 Scale as a predictor of outcomes in decisions to transfer patients from high to lower levels of security--a UK perspective.

Authors:  Mairead Dolan; Regine Blattner
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  Prospective in-patient cohort study of moves between levels of therapeutic security: the DUNDRUM-1 triage security, DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery scales and the HCR-20.

Authors:  Mary Davoren; Sarah O'Dwyer; Zareena Abidin; Leena Naughton; Olivia Gibbons; Elaine Doyle; Kim McDonnell; Stephen Monks; Harry G Kennedy
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.