Matthew W Colman1, Syed M Karim2, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon2, Frank X Pedlow2, Kevin A Raskin2, Francis J Hornicek2, Joseph H Schwab2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Ste 300, Chicago, IL 02114, USA. Electronic address: matthew.colman@rushortho.com. 2. Harvard Combined Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Little has been reported regarding the patient-centered quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after en bloc spondylectomy (ES). Despite lower local recurrence rates, it is unknown whether outcomes justify the surgical morbidity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on patient QOL after ES as measured by validated instruments and to identify factors that may predict better postoperative QOL. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study (Level III). PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty-five consecutive patients with mobile spine tumors were included. Twenty-seven patients underwent en bloc resection, whereas 8 patients received definitive radiation and no surgery. Minimum follow-up was 6 months (median, 32 months). OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were European Quality Group 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ5D), four Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short-form metrics, Neck Disability Index, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). METHODS: We performed statistical comparisons between the surgery and radiation groups, of the general US population, and within the study group itself to identify predictors of higher QOL scores. RESULTS: We identified a significant difference in QOL between the surgery and radiation groups in only one instrument, PROMIS pain interference, with surgery having more pain interference (15.7 vs. 10.1, p=.04). For most metrics, including EQ5D, pain interference, pain behavior, and ODI, scores were around one standard deviation worse than the US population mean. Multivariable linear regression for each instrument demonstrated that preoperative factors such as better performance status, tumor location in the cervical spine, lack of mechanical back or neck pain, and shorter fusion span were independently predictive of better QOL scores. Postoperative factors such as poor performance status, chronic narcotic use, and local recurrence were more dominant than preoperative factors in predicting worse QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may experience more pain interference after surgery as opposed to definitive radiotherapy, but we did not identify a difference for most metrics. Quality of life in our study group was significantly worse than the general population for most metrics. Cervical tumors, lack of mechanical pain, better baseline performance status, and less extensive surgery predict better QOL after surgery.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Little has been reported regarding the patient-centered quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after en bloc spondylectomy (ES). Despite lower local recurrence rates, it is unknown whether outcomes justify the surgical morbidity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report on patient QOL after ES as measured by validated instruments and to identify factors that may predict better postoperative QOL. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study (Level III). PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty-five consecutive patients with mobile spine tumors were included. Twenty-seven patients underwent en bloc resection, whereas 8 patients received definitive radiation and no surgery. Minimum follow-up was 6 months (median, 32 months). OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were European Quality Group 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ5D), four Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short-form metrics, Neck Disability Index, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). METHODS: We performed statistical comparisons between the surgery and radiation groups, of the general US population, and within the study group itself to identify predictors of higher QOL scores. RESULTS: We identified a significant difference in QOL between the surgery and radiation groups in only one instrument, PROMIS pain interference, with surgery having more pain interference (15.7 vs. 10.1, p=.04). For most metrics, including EQ5D, pain interference, pain behavior, and ODI, scores were around one standard deviation worse than the US population mean. Multivariable linear regression for each instrument demonstrated that preoperative factors such as better performance status, tumor location in the cervical spine, lack of mechanical back or neck pain, and shorter fusion span were independently predictive of better QOL scores. Postoperative factors such as poor performance status, chronic narcotic use, and local recurrence were more dominant than preoperative factors in predicting worse QOL. CONCLUSIONS:Patients may experience more pain interference after surgery as opposed to definitive radiotherapy, but we did not identify a difference for most metrics. Quality of life in our study group was significantly worse than the general population for most metrics. Cervical tumors, lack of mechanical pain, better baseline performance status, and less extensive surgery predict better QOL after surgery.
Authors: Raphaële Charest-Morin; Charles G Fisher; Arjun Sahgal; Stefano Boriani; Ziya L Gokaslan; Aron Lazary; Jeremy Reynolds; Chetan Bettegowda; Laurence D Rhines; Nicolas Dea Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira; Stein J Janssen; Nicky Stoop; Stefan Hartveldt; Yen-Lin E Chen; Thomas F DeLaney; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph H Schwab Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2019-02-18
Authors: Alex Oliveira de Araujo; Douglas Kenji Narazaki; William Gemio Jacobsen Teixeira; Cesar Salge Ghilardi; Pedro Henrique Xavier Nabuco de Araujo; Antônio Eduardo Zerati; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 2.365