| Literature DB >> 25861920 |
Nitin Goyal1, Anay R Patel1, Mark A Yaffe1, Michael Y Luo1, S David Stulberg2.
Abstract
PSI software adjusts preoperative planning to accommodate differences in implant design. Such adjustments may influence the accuracy of intraoperative jig placement, bone resection, or component placement. Our purpose was to determine whether implant design influences PSI accuracy. 96 and 123 PSI TKA were performed by a single surgeon using two different implant systems and identical PSI software. Femoral coronal alignment outliers were greater for Implant 1 (23.9% Implant 1 vs. 13.4% Implant 2; P=0.050). Tibial coronal alignment outliers were greater for Implant 2 (10.9% Implant 1 vs. 22.7% Implant 2; P=0.025). There was no difference in overall mechanical axes. Differences in implant design can influence bone resection and component alignment. PSI software rationale must align with surgeons' intraoperative goals.Entities:
Keywords: alignment; implant design; patient specific instrumentation; preoperative planning; total knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861920 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757