| Literature DB >> 25861554 |
Eva Theres Gensberger1, Eva-Maria Gössl1, Livio Antonielli1, Angela Sessitsch1, Tanja Kostić1.
Abstract
Heterotrophic plate counts (HPC) are routinely determined within the scope of water quality assessment. However, variable HPC methods with different cultivation parameters (i.e., temperature and media type) are applied, which could lead to significant effects in the outcome of the analysis. Therefore the effect of different HPC methods, according to DIN EN ISO 6222 and EPA, on the culturable microbial community composition was investigated by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and statistical evaluation was performed. The culturable community composition revealed significant effects assigned to temperature (p < 0.01), while for media type no statistical significance was observed. However, the abundance of certain detected bacteria was affected. Lower temperature (22 °C) showed the abundance of naturally occurring Pseudomonadaceae and Aeromonadaceae, whereas at high temperature (37 °C) numerous Enterobacteriaceae, Citrobacter spp. and Bacilli were identified. The highest biodiversity was detected at lower temperature, especially on R2A medium. These results indicate that different temperatures (low and high) should be included into HPC measurement and selection of media should, ideally, be adjusted to the monitored water source. Accordingly, it can be inferred that the HPC method is more suitable for continuous monitoring of the same water source than for single assessments of a water sample.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis; Culturable community composition; Heterotrophic plate count; Media type; Microbial water quality assessment; Temperature
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861554 PMCID: PMC4389272 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Alpha diversity values grouped by the medium and temperature.
The observed prokaryotic richness and diversity estimates were based on identified OTU clusters from three analyzed water samples (IFA, N167, N170) as replicates.
|
| Observed OTUs | Chao richness estimator | Simpson diversity index % | Coverage % |
|
| 6.2 ± 3.2 | 6.7 ± 3.2 | 66 ± 0.1 | 95 ± 0.03 |
|
| 5.2 ± 2.2 | 7.8 ± 8.0 | 64 ± 0.1 | 96 ± 0.1 |
|
| Observed OTUs | Chao richness estimator | Simpson diversity index* | Coverage % |
|
| 7.3 ± 2.9 | 10.0 ± 7.5 | 72 ± 0.1 | 94 ± 0.1 |
|
| 4.0 ± 0.9 | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 57 ± 0.05 | 97 ± 0.03 |
Notes.
Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were reported according to a nonparametric permutation test using 9999 permutations and the FDR method was used for correcting the comparisons. The p-values were significant for the observed OTUs and the Simpson diversity index, for the temperature only.
Figure 1Identification of the community composition from partial sequences of the 16S rRNA gene.
Two different HPC methods (EN ISO 6222:1999 and EPA recommendations) and the corresponding cultivation conditions such as medium type (R2A or YEA) and incubation temperature (22 °C and 37 °C) were tested. The community composition for each cultivation treatment is averaged over three water samples. Identified sequence types were assigned to the deepest taxon level possible.
Figure 2Multivariate analysis by ordination method.
The evaluation of statistical significances of the cultivation parameters (i.e., temperature and media type) was performed by Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA). The biplots for each taxon (grey spheres) were plotted with diameters proportional to the numbers of assigned sequences. Each sample data point was drawn as a central point, surrounded by a semi-transparent cloud representing the variation in jackknifed Unifrac results. The PCoA plot illustrates clustering of communities according to the temperature of cultivation. Media type (R2A and YEA) showed only differences in the abundances of taxa (cluster sphere).(Aeromonadaceae (Tax1); Enterobacteriaceae (Tax2); Citrobacter spp. (Tax3); Bacilli (Tax4); Bacillaceae (Tax5); Pseudomonadaceae (Tax6); Pseudomonas spp. (Tax7); Acinetobacter spp. (Tax8); Janthinobacterium spp. (Tax9); Serratia spp. (Tax10); Delftia spp. (Tax11); Comamonadaceae (Tax12))