| Literature DB >> 25861356 |
Ming-Ming Xu1, Jing-Ke Guo1, Jin-Sen Xu2, Chao-Xin Zhang3, Shu-Tao Liu3, Ri-Tao Liao3, Chun-Tong Lin3, Jian-Hui Guo3, Ping-Fan Rao1.
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that superoxide anions are possibly traveling along acupuncture meridians. The electrical potential difference (EPD) between acupoints may be related to the movement. To test the above hypothesis, we conducted a study investigating the effects of acupoint antioxidant interventions on the meridian EPD. Firstly, ST39 (L) and ST44 (L) were screened out for the EPD detection along the stomach meridian, and ST36 (L) was selected for interventions including acumassage with the control cream, as well as the TAT-SOD cream for 30 minutes, or injection with reduced glutathione sodium. The EPD between ST39 and ST44 was recorded for 80 minutes and measured again 48 h later. While the EPD increased during the acumassage, the acumassage with TAT-SOD cream and the glutathione injection generated waves of EPD increased, indicating the migration or removal from the visceral organ of a greater quantity of superoxide. Remarkably lower EPD readings 48 h later with both antioxidant acupoint interventions than the mere acumassage imply a more complete superoxide flushing out due to the restored superoxide pathway at the acupoint after interventions. The results confirm superoxide transportation along the meridians and demonstrate a possibility of acupoint EPD measurement as a tool to monitor changes in the meridians and acupoints.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861356 PMCID: PMC4377379 DOI: 10.1155/2015/286989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
EPD detection acupoints of ST and their anatomical positions.
| Acupoints | Location |
|---|---|
| ST36: Zusanli | On the anterior lateral side of the leg, 3 Cun below ST35 Dubi*, one finger breadth (middle finger) from the anterior crest of the tibia |
| ST37: Shangjuxu | On the anterolateral side of the leg, 6 Cun below ST35 Dubi, one finger breadth (middle finger) from the anterior crest of the tibia |
| ST39: Xiajuxu | On the anterolateral side of the leg, 9 Cun below ST35 Dubi, one finger breadth (middle finger) from the anterior crest of the tibia |
| ST42: Chongyang | On the dome of the instep of the foot, between the tendons of the long extensor muscle of the big toe and the long extensor muscle of the toes, where the pulsation of the dorsal artery of the foot is palpable |
| ST44: Neiting | On the instep of the foot, in the depression distal to the commissure of the 2nd and 3rd metatarsal bones |
*Location of ST35 Dubi: with the knee flexed, on the knee, in the depression lateral to the patella and its ligament.
The interclass variance and between-cluster variance of the EPD of acupoints along the ST meridian.
| Acupoints | Interclass variance | Between-cluster variance |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST36-ST37 (L) | 2.07 | 6.48 | ∗∗ | ∗ |
| ST36-ST37 (R) | 1.31 | 7.19 | ∗∗ | |
| ST36–ST39 (L) | 1.02 | 8.31 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST36–ST39 (R) | 1.38 | 7.22 | ∗∗ | |
| ST36–ST42 (L) | 2.54 | 5.68 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST36–ST42 (R) | 1.26 | 6.28 | ∗∗ | |
| ST36–ST44 (L) | 1.33 | 7.10 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST36–ST44 (R) | 1.79 | 4.31 | ∗∗ | |
| ST37–ST39 (L) | 1.91 | 7.79 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST37–ST39 (R) | 1.46 | 7.71 | ∗∗ | |
| ST37–ST42 (L) | 1.92 | 8.18 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST37–ST42 (R) | 3.90 | 6.16 | ∗∗ | |
| ST37–ST44 (L) | 1.29 | 6.27 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST37–ST44 (R) | 1.14 | 6.18 | ∗∗ | |
| ST39–ST42 (L) | 2.30 | 7.20 | ∗∗ | ∗ |
| ST39–ST42 (R) | 1.29 | 7.46 | ∗∗ | |
|
|
|
| ∗∗ | |
| ST39–ST44 (R) | 2.15 | 5.41 | ∗∗ | |
| ST42–ST44 (L) | 3.18 | 6.21 | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| ST42–ST44 (R) | 2.48 | 5.20 | ∗∗ |
T 1 (paired t-test): comparing the EPD of the same points of different subjects.
T 2 (two-sample t-test): comparing the left EPD and right EPD of the same detection points.
**(P < 0.01): regarded as very significant.
*(P < 0.05): regarded as significant.
Figure 1A diagrammatic sketch of how to monitor the variation of the EPD between ST39 and ST44 caused by different acupoint interventions on ST36.
Figure 2Monitoring the EPD caused by acupoint antioxidant interventions and acupuncture. (a) group A: no treatment; (b) group B: acumassage without cream; (c) group C: acumassage with control cream; (d) group D: acumassage with TAT-SOD cream (3000 U/mL); (e) group E: injection of reduced glutathione sodium (100 μL, 0.12 g/mL); and (f) group F: acupuncture. Downward arrow: start-time of intervention; upward arrow: end-time of intervention.
The reduction of EPD 48 h after treatments.
| Treatment | The reduction of EPD (mV) | |
|---|---|---|
| A | No treatment on acupoint | 0.34 ± 1.67a# |
| B | Acumassage without cream | 1.05 ± 1.96a |
| C | Acumassage with control cream | 1.00 ± 1.75a |
| D | Acumassage with TAT-SOD cream | 4.51 ± 0.51b |
| E | Reduced glutathione sodium injection on acupoint | 7.79 ± 0.64c |
| F | Acupuncture | 4.35 ± 0.38b |
#Values in the same column with different letters were significantly different by Duncan's test (P < 0.01).
Figure 3Schematics of a possible involvement of the acupoint superoxide removal.