| Literature DB >> 25861281 |
Shi-Lei Guo1, Zhi-Ying Zhang2, Yan Xu3, Yun-Xia Zhi2, Chang-Jie Han2, Yu-Hao Zhou4, Fang Liu2, Hai-Yan Lin2, Chuan-Sen Zhang2.
Abstract
Effective repair of peripheral nerve defects is difficult because of the slow growth of new axonal growth. We propose that "neural-like cells" may be useful for the protection of peripheral nerve destructions. Such cells should prolong the time for the disintegration of spinal nerves, reduce lesions, and improve recovery. But the mechanism of neural-like cells in the peripheral nerve is still unclear. In this study, bone marrow-derived neural-like cells were used as seed cells. The cells were injected into the distal end of severed rabbit peripheral nerves that were no longer integrated with the central nervous system. Electromyography (EMG), immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were employed to analyze the development of the cells in the peripheral nerve environment. The CMAP amplitude appeared during the 5th week following surgery, at which time morphological characteristics of myelinated nerve fiber formation were observed. Bone marrow-derived neural-like cells could protect the disintegration and destruction of the injured peripheral nerve.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861281 PMCID: PMC4378708 DOI: 10.1155/2015/941625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 1Morphology and immunofluorescence analysis of NTCSC-derived neurons. (a) Representative image of the cells at 80% confluence. (b) Representative image of cells cultured in serum-free medium. (c) The cells aggregated into groups following RA/SHH induction. (d) H&E staining revealed that the cells possessed neuron-like morphology following induction. After 48 hours of induction, the expression of Nestin ((e), (f)) and β-III tubulin ((g), (h)) was observed. Synapsin I was also expressed in aggregated cells (i), and NeuN was present in the nuclei (j). The uninduced cells were negative for these markers (Nestin, (k); β-III tubulin, (l); synapsin I, (m)). Nuclei ((f), (h), (k), (l), (m)) was staining with DAPI. Scale bar: ((c), (j), (k), (l), (m)): 100 μm; ((a), (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i)): 200 μm.
Figure 2Electromyogram (EMG) of the quadriceps in the three groups. (a) Experimental group; (b) control group; (c) sham-operated group. The figure shows the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude at four time points.
The CMAP amplitudes in three groups at each time point.
|
| Weeks | Experimental group amp. (mV) | Control group amp. (mV) | Sham operation group amp. (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 16.00 |
| 2 | 8 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 25.50 |
| 3 | 11 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 12.18 |
| 4 | 14 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 12.08 |
| 5 | 19 | 3.80 | 0.00 | 25.60 |
| 6 | 23 | 5.92 | 0.00 | 15.05 |
| 7 | 24 | 7.17 | 0.00 | 20.30 |
| 8 | 26 | 11.00 | 0.00 | 20.80 |
|
| ||||
| Mean | 4.23 | 0.00 | 18.44 | |
|
| ||||
| Std | 3.56 | 0.00 | 5.44 | |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Experimental group: 4.23 ± 3.56. Control group: 0.00 ± 0.00. Sham operation group: 18.44 ± 5.44. Two independent samples of t test showed that there is statistical difference between experimental group and control group, t = 2.72, P < 0.05. CMAP: compound muscle action potential; SD: standard deviation.
Figure 3Immunohistochemistry. Positive regions (arrow) of NF-M staining were observed in the experimental group and the sham-operated group ((a), (g)), but not in the control group (d). NeuN staining was only detected in the experimental group ((b), arrow) and not the control and sham-operated groups ((h), (e)). S-100 staining in the sham-operated group was observed in regions of regular morphology (i). S100 staining in the experimental group (c) was higher than in the control group. EG: experimental group; CG: control group; SOG: sham-operated group. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the femoral nerve from the experiment group. Axon-like structures were wrapped in myelin (a) and mitochondria were also observed (arrow). The thickness of the myelin sheath showed significant difference between the three groups ((b), (c), (d)). Scale bar: (a) 1 μm; ((b)–(d)) 500 nm.
Figure 5Antibody staining of neuromuscular junctions in the experimental group. The junction of nerve (upper left corner) and muscle (right hand side) was positive (arrow) for synaptophysin staining. Scale bar: 400 μm.