| Literature DB >> 25861265 |
Jin-Lin Hu1, Si-Si Hu2, Xiu-Xiu Hou3, Xin Zhu3, Jun Cao3, Lie-Hao Jiang3, Ming-Hua Ge4.
Abstract
ATM and γH2AX play a vital role in the detection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and DNA damage response (DDR). This study aims to investigate ATM and γH2AX expression in thyroid cancer and discuss possible relationship between thyroid function tests and DNA damage. The expression of ATM and γH2AX was detected by immunohistochemistry in 30 cases of benign nodular goiter, 110 cases of well differentiated thyroid cancer, 22 cases of poorly differentiated thyroid cancer, and 21 cases of anaplastic thyroid cancer. Clinicopathological features, including differentiation stages, distant metastasis, lymph node metastasis, T classification, TNM stage, and tests of thyroid functions (TPOAb, Tg Ab, T3, FT3, T4, FT4, TSH, and Tg), were reviewed and their associations with γH2AX and ATM were analyzed. γH2AX and ATM expressed higher in thyroid cancer tissues than in benign nodular goiter and normal adjacent tissues. γH2AX was correlated with ATM in thyroid cancer. Both γH2AX and ATM expression were associated with FT3. γH2AX was also associated with T classification, TNM stage, FT4, TSH, and differentiation status. Therefore both of ATM and γH2AX seem to correlate with thyroid hormones and γH2AX plays a role in the differentiation status of thyroid cancer.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861265 PMCID: PMC4378699 DOI: 10.1155/2015/136810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
The evaluation standards of the tests of thyroid functions.
| Thyroid hormone | Level | Thyroid hormone | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TgAb | TPOAb | ||||
| N | 0–115 | U/mL | N | 0–34 | U/mL |
| H | >115 | U/mL | H | >34 | U/mL |
| T3 | T4 | ||||
| L | <0.6 | ng/mL | L | <4.5 |
|
| N | 0.6–1.81 | ng/mL | N | 4.5–10.9 |
|
| H | >1.81 | ng/mL | H | >10.9 |
|
| FT3 | FT4 | ||||
| L | <2.3 | pg/mL | L | <0.89 | ng/dL |
| N | 2.3–4.2 | pg/mL | N | 0.89–1.76 | ng/dL |
| H | >4.2 | pg/mL | H | >1.76 | ng/dL |
| TSH | Tg | ||||
| L | <0.35 |
| L | <1.4 | ng/mL |
| N | 0.35–5.5 |
| N | 1.4–78 | ng/mL |
| H | >5.5 |
| H | >78 | ng/mL |
L represents low expression level; N represents normal expression level; H represents high expression level.
Figure 1γH2AX expression in thyroid tissues. (A) High expression of γH2AX in well differentiated thyroid cancer. (a) Low expression of γH2AX in well differentiated thyroid cancer. (B) High expression of γH2AX in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. (b) Low expression of γH2AX in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. (C) High expression of γH2AX in anaplastic thyroid cancer. (c) Low expression of γH2AX in anaplastic thyroid cancer. (D) High expression of γH2AX in benign nodular goiter tissues. (d) Low expression of γH2AX in benign nodular goiter tissues. (E) High expression of γH2AX in normal adjacent tissues. (e) Low expression of γH2AX in normal adjacent tissues. Original magnification of all images, ×200.
Figure 2ATM expression in thyroid tissues. (A) High expression of ATM in well differentiated thyroid cancer. (a) Low expression of ATM in well differentiated thyroid cancer. (B) High expression of ATM in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. (b) Low expression of ATM in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. (C) High expression of ATM in anaplastic thyroid cancer. (c) Low expression of ATM in anaplastic thyroid cancer. (D) High expression of ATM in benign nodular goiter tissues. (d) Low expression of ATM in benign nodular goiter tissues. (E) High expression of ATM in normal adjacent tissues. (e) Low expression of ATM in normal adjacent tissues. Original magnification of all images, ×200.
Correlation between ATM and γH2AX in thyroid cancer.
| Number | ATM-low | ATM-high |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
|
| 44 | 36 | 81.8% | 8 | 22.2% | 0.007 |
|
| 109 | 64 | 58.7% | 45 | 41.3% | |
Association between γH2AX expression and clinicopathological features.
| Number |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| Total number | ||||||
| Distant metastasis | 0.17 | |||||
| − | 134 | 36 | 26.9% | 98 | 73.1% | |
| + | 19 | 8 | 42.1% | 11 | 57.9% | |
| T classification | <0.001 | |||||
| 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 6 | 85.7% | |
| 3 | 84 | 13 | 15.5% | 71 | 84.5% | |
| 4 | 51 | 30 | 58.8% | 21 | 41.2% | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.1 | |||||
| − | 46 | 9 | 19.6% | 37 | 80.4% | |
| + | 107 | 35 | 32.7% | 72 | 67.3% | |
| TNM stage (2002 AJCC) | <0.001 | |||||
| I | 49 | 5 | 10.2% | 44 | 89.8% | |
| II | 7 | 3 | 42.9% | 4 | 57.1% | |
| III | 42 | 5 | 11.9% | 37 | 88.1% | |
| IV | 55 | 31 | 56.4% | 24 | 43.6% | |
| Differentiation | <0.001 | |||||
| Well differentiated | 110 | 11 | 10.0% | 99 | 90.0% | |
| Poorly differentiated | 22 | 15 | 68.2% | 7 | 31.8% | |
| Anaplastic | 21 | 18 | 85.7% | 3 | 14.3% | |
| TPOAb | 0.376 | |||||
| N | 120 | 30 | 25.0% | 90 | 75.0% | |
| H | 27 | 9 | 33.3% | 18 | 66.7% | |
| TgAb | ||||||
| N | 119 | 30 | 25.2% | 89 | 74.8% | 0.455 |
| H | 28 | 9 | 32.1% | 19 | 67.9% | |
| T3 | ||||||
| L | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 5 | 83.3% | 0.421 |
| N | 141 | 40 | 28.4% | 101 | 71.6% | |
| H | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 100.0% | |
| FT3 | ||||||
| L | 10 | 5 | 50.0% | 5 | 50.0% | 0.043 |
| N | 130 | 31 | 23.8% | 99 | 76.2% | |
| H | 9 | 5 | 55.6% | 4 | 44.4% | |
| T4 | 0.308 | |||||
| L | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 2 | 66.7% | |
| N | 133 | 34 | 25.6% | 99 | 74.4% | |
| H | 13 | 6 | 46.2% | 7 | 53.8% | |
| FT4 | 0.009 | |||||
| L | 7 | 4 | 57.1% | 3 | 42.9% | |
| N | 135 | 32 | 23.7% | 103 | 76.3% | |
| H | 7 | 5 | 71.4% | 2 | 28.6% | |
| TSH | <0.001 | |||||
| L | 7 | 6 | 85.7% | 1 | 14.3% | |
| N | 133 | 27 | 20.3% | 106 | 79.7% | |
| H | 9 | 8 | 88.9% | 1 | 11.1% | |
| Tg | 0.082 | |||||
| L | 14 | 5 | 35.7% | 9 | 64.3% | |
| N | 97 | 20 | 20.6% | 77 | 79.4% | |
| H | 36 | 14 | 38.9% | 22 | 61.1% | |
Association between ATM expression and clinicopathological features.
| Number |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| Total number | ||||||
| Distant metastasis | 0.183 | |||||
| − | 134 | 85 | 63.4% | 49 | 36.6% | |
| + | 19 | 15 | 78.9% | 4 | 21.1% | |
| T classification | ||||||
| 1 | 11 | 9 | 81.8% | 2 | 18.2% | 0.287 |
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 85.7% | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 3 | 84 | 51 | 60.7% | 33 | 39.3% | |
| 4 | 51 | 34 | 66.7% | 17 | 33.3% | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.132 | |||||
| − | 46 | 26 | 56.5% | 20 | 43.5% | |
| + | 107 | 74 | 69.2% | 33 | 30.8% | |
| TNM stage (2002 AJCC) | 0.602 | |||||
| I | 49 | 33 | 67.3% | 16 | 32.7% | |
| II | 7 | 6 | 85.7% | 1 | 14.3% | |
| III | 42 | 26 | 61.9% | 16 | 38.1% | |
| IV | 55 | 35 | 63.6% | 20 | 36.4% | |
| Differentiation | 0.05 | |||||
| Well differentiated | 110 | 70 | 63.6% | 40 | 36.4% | |
| Poorly differentiated | 22 | 19 | 86.4% | 3 | 13.6% | |
| Anaplastic | 21 | 11 | 52.4% | 10 | 47.6% | |
| TPOAb | 0.541 | |||||
| N | 120 | 77 | 64.2% | 43 | 35.8% | |
| H | 27 | 19 | 70.4% | 8 | 29.6% | |
| TgAb | 0.231 | |||||
| N | 119 | 75 | 63.0% | 44 | 37.0% | |
| H | 28 | 21 | 75.0% | 7 | 25.0% | |
| T3 | 0.548 | |||||
| L | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 1 | 16.7% | |
| N | 141 | 91 | 64.5% | 50 | 35.5% | |
| H | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 | 50.0% | |
| FT3 | 0.009 | |||||
| L | 10 | 8 | 80.0% | 2 | 20.0% | |
| N | 130 | 80 | 61.5% | 50 | 38.5% | |
| H | 9 | 9 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| T4 | 0.037 | |||||
| L | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
| N | 133 | 89 | 66.9% | 44 | 33.1% | |
| H | 13 | 5 | 38.5% | 8 | 61.5% | |
| FT4 | 0.448 | |||||
| L | 7 | 3 | 42.9% | 4 | 57.1% | |
| N | 135 | 89 | 65.9% | 46 | 34.1% | |
| H | 4 | 5 | 125.0% | 2 | 50.0% | |
| TSH | 0.448 | |||||
| L | 7 | 6 | 85.7% | 1 | 14.3% | |
| N | 133 | 85 | 63.9% | 48 | 36.1% | |
| H | 9 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 33.3% | |
| Tg | 0.505 | |||||
| L | 14 | 11 | 78.6% | 3 | 21.4% | |
| N | 97 | 61 | 62.9% | 36 | 37.1% | |
| H | 36 | 24 | 66.7% | 12 | 33.3% | |