Literature DB >> 25860891

De novo transcriptome assembly and the putative biosynthetic pathway of steroidal sapogenins of Dioscorea composita.

Xia Wang1, Dijia Chen1, Yuqi Wang1, Jun Xie1.   

Abstract

The plant Dioscorea composita has important applications in the medical and energy industries, and can be used for the extraction of steroidal sapogenins (important raw materials for the synthesis of steroidal drugs) and bioethanol production. However, little is known at the genetic level about how sapogenins are biosynthesized in this plant. Using Illumina deep sequencing, 62,341 unigenes were obtained by assembling its transcriptome, and 27,720 unigenes were annotated. Of these, 8,022 unigenes were mapped to 243 specific pathways, and 531 unigenes were identified to be involved in 24 secondary metabolic pathways. 35 enzymes, which were encoded by 79 unigenes, were related to the biosynthesis of steroidal sapogenins in this transcriptome database, covering almost all the nodes in the steroidal pathway. The results of real-time PCR experiments on ten related transcripts (HMGR, MK, SQLE, FPPS, DXS, CAS, HMED, CYP51, DHCR7, and DHCR24) indicated that sapogenins were mainly biosynthesized by the mevalonate pathway. The expression of these ten transcripts in the tuber and leaves was found to be much higher than in the stem. Also, expression in the shoots was low. The nucleotide and protein sequences and conserved domains of four related genes (HMGR, CAS, SQS, and SMT1) were highly conserved between D. composita and D. zingiberensis; but expression of these four genes is greater in D. composita. However, there is no expression of these key enzymes in potato and no steroidal sapogenins are synthesized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25860891      PMCID: PMC4393236          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Background

Steroidal sapogenins exist naturally as aglycones of steroidal saponins (a large family with enormous structural diversity) which have attracted a great deal of interest lately due to their wide spectrum of biological and pharmacological functions [1-2]. Steroidal saponins are among the more widely distributed secondary metabolites within the plant kingdom [3]. Saponin-deficient mutants have their defenses compromised to a range of pathogens, confirming the saponins’ roles in plant resistance [4]. Steroidal saponins have been a significant ingredient in traditional medicine for a long time to treat cardiac disease, cancer, fungal infection, and so on[5-6]. In the medical industry, steroidal sapogenins are widely used as the starting material for the synthesis of many steroidal drugs (e.g. antioxidants, anti-inflammatories, androgen, estrogen, and contraceptives) due to the similarity between their skeletons and those of the steroidal medicine [7]. More importantly, steroidal sapogenins are attractive to many synthetic and medicinal chemists aiming to harness their anticancer activity [8]. The major steroidal sapogenins exist mainly in monocots such as some species of the Dioscoreaceae family [9]. Dioscorea composita is one of the most important resources because its tuber is rich in steroidal sapogenins and starch. D. composita originates from Mexico and is suited to tropical and subtropical zones [10]. In 1980, D. composita was successfully imported and planted in China for the first time by the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences [11]. According to an assay we undertook, the steroidal sapogenin content in the tuber of D. composita was 3.68% ± 0.5% (dry weight), which was approximately twice that of Dioscorea zingiberensis (the primary material used to extract sapogenins in China for several decades). The harvest of D. composita obtained was 45–90 tons per hectare, much higher than that for D. zingiberensis. For these reasons, D. composita appears to be an excellent medicinal and energy-resource providing plant. The major steroidal sapogenins isolated from D. composita can be divided into spirostane- and furostane-type sapogenins according to the structures of their skeletons [12]. The main compound, diosgenin, belongs to the spirostane-type and has a hexacyclic ABCDEF-ring system (Fig 1). Two other important ones, asperin and methyl asperin, belong to the furostane-type and possess ABCDE-ring systems [13].
Fig 1

The structures of some of the steroidal sapogenins in D. composita.

Steroidal sapogenins are complex molecules and are synthesized by equally complex biosynthetic pathways. As there is no genetic information about D. composita, it is very difficult to reveal the biosynthesis of the active ingredients. Recently, great advances in transcriptome deep sequencing technology and bioinformatics have opened a new avenue for such investigations. Compared with the conventional methods for gene cloning and sequencing, the new generation sequencing technology affords a quick, easy, and full-scale method of investigation, especially in the context of metabolism research. The technique has already been used to investigate the transcriptome of various plants, e.g. Salvia miltiorrhiza[14], Fagopyrum esculentum [15], Craterostigma plantagineum [16], and others. In this article, the Illumina deep RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) method was used to analyze the transcriptome of 18-month-old D. composita at harvest. Using the technique, a list of putative genes involved in the biosynthetic pathway of diosgenin were determined. The results are helpful for enriching the gene resources of D. composita and discovering the genes related to valuable ingredients. They also contribute to enhancing the active components by metabolic regulation (or other biological methods) on the basis of the transcriptome database of D. composita.

Results and Discussion

Short-reads de novo sequencing and assembly

Illumina deep RNA sequencing technology was employed to sequence the transcriptome of D. composita. Samples were collected from six plants for conducting RNA-Seq analysis. In total, 114,136,043 clean paired-end reads were obtained corresponding overall to 8.0 Gbp (NCBI accession: SRR1525775, SRR1525776, SRR1525777, SRR1525779, SRR1525790, SRR1525791, SRR1525792, and SRR1525793). All of these clean paired-end reads were pooled together and de novo assembled by using Trinity software (v2012-10-15) [17]. Finally, 131,655 transcripts with length above 200 bp were obtained. The average length of these transcripts was 1,368 bp and the N50 length was 2,303 bp. There were 62,285 transcripts with length ≥1,000 bp, 31,868 transcripts with length ≥ 2,000 bp, and the max length was 25,464 bp. The longest transcript of each gene was selected as the unigene, and we generated 62,341 unigenes above 200 bp. The average length of these unigenes was 724 bp, and the N50 length was 1,228 bp. There were 14,425 unigenes ≥ 1,000 bp, 5,975 unigenes ≥ 2,000 bp, and the max length was 22,744 bp (Table 1). Common perl scripts were used to conduct the statistical analysis.
Table 1

Summary of the transcript statistics generated from D. composita.

ItemCharacteristics
Number of paired-end reads114,136,043
Transcript number131,655
Transcripts ≥ 1000 bp62,285
Transcripts ≥ 2000 bp31,868
Average length of transcripts (bp)1,368
Max length of transcripts (bp)25,464
N50 length of transcripts (bp)2,303
Unigene number62,341
Unigenes ≥ 1000 bp14,425
Unigenes ≥ 2000 bp5,975
Average length of Unigenes (bp)724
Max length of Unigenes (bp)22,744
N50 length of Unigenes (bp)1,228
To evaluate the final assembly, the ratios of the conserved domain sequences (CDSs) with different lengths containing transcripts to the total number of transcripts were calculated. For example, there were 17,346 transcripts containing long-CDSs with length ≥ 1,500 bp, so the ratio was 13.2% (compared with 131,655, the total number of transcripts—see Table 2). In the final results, 83,114 transcripts contained CDSs with length ≥ 300 bp (a ratio of 63.1%).
Table 2

Summary of the statistics of the CDS-containing sequences.

Length of CDS (bp)Number of transcriptsRatio (%)
300–59927,39820.8
600–89915,36811.7
900–119913,79710.5
1200–14999,2057.0
≥ 150017,34613.2
Total83,11463.1
Additionally, the authors aligned the 396 nucleotide sequences of Dioscorea from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the total transcripts under the condition that the blast length was greater than 200 bp. The number of sequences hit was 370 with an average sensitivity of 81.5%. These assessments suggest that the assembly was satisfactory.

Functional annotation and classification of D. composita transcriptome

To investigate the function of these unigenes, sequence similarity was compared with several databases: the non-redundant protein database (NR) and the Arabidopsis protein database and the Rice protein database using Blastx software (e values < 10–5)[18], the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database using KAAS software (e values < 10–10)[19]. The protein family and domain predictions were completed by using the protein family (Pfam) database andhmmscan software package(e values < 10–2)[20]. A total of 27,720 unigenes (44.5%) were annotated using the public protein databases (see Table 3 and S1–S5 Tables).
Table 3

Summary of the functional annotation statistics for the D. composita unigenes in the protein databases.

Annotated databaseNumber of unigenePercentage (%)
NR22,81536.6
Arabidopsis protein database20,25732.5
Rice protein database21,01733.7
KEGG8,02212.9
Pfam20,74733.3
Total27,72044.5
KEGG classification of the annotated unigenes was executed. The results indicated that 8,022 (12.9%) of the unigenes could be mapped to the KEGG database. The analysis revealed that: 864 (10.8%) of these unigenes are clustered into a ‘cellular processes’ section wherein the majority of the terms relate to ‘transport and catabolism’; 719 (9.0%) are grouped into an ‘environmental information processing’ category and mostly enriched in ‘signal transduction’; 2,009 (25.0%) of the unigenes are clustered in a ‘genetic information processing’ section in which more than half belong to a ‘translation’ sub-section; 3,866 (48.2%) are clustered into a ‘metabolism’ category and the majority of these relate to ‘carbohydrate metabolism’; 1,316 (16.4%) of the unigenes can be grouped into a ‘organism systems’ category, where the largest sub-section is ‘environmental adaptation’ (see Fig 2).
Fig 2

KEGG classification of the unigenes from RNA-Seq experiments on D. composita.

Key: A–cellular processes, B–environmental information processing, C–genetic information processing, D–metabolism, and E–organism systems.

KEGG classification of the unigenes from RNA-Seq experiments on D. composita.

Key: A–cellular processes, B–environmental information processing, C–genetic information processing, D–metabolism, and E–organism systems.

Secondary metabolic pathway analysis

KEGG maps provide much information to help understand the high-level functions of a biological system. Metabolic pathway analysis enables us to realize which genes in the same pathway cooperate with each other as they exercise their biological functions. In all, 8,022 unigenes could be mapped with 243 metabolic pathways based on the KEGG blast analysis, and 531 unigenes were mapped into 24 secondary metabolic biosynthetic pathways (Fig 3). These secondary metabolic genes supplied further information for analyzing the secondary metabolite biosyntheses. Many unigenes which encode key enzymes in the biosynthetic pathways for phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, steroids, stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid and gingerol in D. composita were confirmed.
Fig 3

Unigenes related to secondary metabolism from RNA-Seq experiments on D. composita.

Steroidal sapogenin biosynthetic pathways

Steroidal sapogenins in plants were biosynthesized from two common C5 isoprene unites: isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate. These unites were synthesized by the cytosolic mevalonate (MVA) and plastial 2-C-methl-D-erythritol-4-phospate (MEP) pathways [21]. The MVA pathway played a major role in the production of steroidal backbones [22]. A total of 35 enzymes encoded by 79 unigenes were related to steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis in this transcriptome database (Table 4 and S6 Table). These almost cover the entire pathway. The protein families in which these unigenes are involved are listed in Table 4, the similarity of these unigenes with Arabidopsis and rice is presented in Table 5 and the primary biosynthetic pathway is illustrated in Fig 4.
Table 4

The number of unigenes (NU) potentially related to steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis from RNA-Seq experiments on D. composita and their ID.

PathwayEnzymeNUPfam ID
Terpenoid backboneatoB3PF00108, PF02803
HMGS8PF01154, PF08540, PF08541, PF08545, PF00560
HMGR6PF03884, PF00368
MK1—-
PMK1PF00288
MVD1PF00288
IDI2PF00293
GPPS7PF00348, PF00420, PF11057, PF04847, PF01690
FPPS1PF08091, PF00348
FNTA1PF01239
FACE21PF02517
STE241PF01435
FOLK1PF01254, PF01148
FLDH1PF01370, PF04321, PF02719, PF00106, PF01073
PCME1PF02230, PF01738, PF07859, PF00326, PF01179
ICMT1PF04140
PCYOX11PF07992, PF01593, PF01266
DXS4PF02780, PF00676, PF02775, PF04805, PF07817
DXR1PF03447, PF02670, PF08436, PF01118
CMK1—-
MCS1PF02542
HMED1PF05699, PF04551, PF00293, PF05026, PF00118
HDR1PF00643, PF01667, PF01485
Sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesisSQS1PF00494
SQLE1PF01210, PF02737, PF05834, PF01266, PF08491, PF02558, PF07992, PF00070, PF01134
Steroid biosynthesisCAS1PF04159, PF00432, PF07678
Cycloeucalenol cycloisomerase1—-
Sterol methyl oxidase8PF04116
Methyl transferase2PF01135, PF08003, PF08241, PF08498, PF01209, PF02353, PF05175, PF02322, PF09445
Carboxylate-dehydrogenase2PF01370, PF02719, PF04321, PF01073, PF02453
Cytochrome P4506PF00067, PF00283,PF11023, PF01254,
Hydroxysteroid-isomerases1PF04116, PF01545, PF00172,PF05241
Sterol reductase6PF00014, PF01222, PF02326, PF01565, PF00424, PF02148, PF04790, PF06363, PF09088
Methylsterol monooxygenase2PF04116
Sterol desaturase1PF04116, PF01545, PF00172
Total3579
Table 5

The similarity of unigenes (NU) potentially related to steroidal sapogenin biosynthesison D. composita with Arabidopsis and Rice.

EnzymeSimilarity ID
Arabidopsis Rice
atoBAT5G48230.1, AT5G47720.1LOC_Os01g02020.3
HMGSAT4G11820.1, AT4G11820.2LOC_Os03g02710.1, LOC_Os08g43170.1, LOC_Os09g34960.1
HMGRAT2G17370.1LOC_Os09g31970.1
MKAT5G27450.3LOC_Os10g18220.1
PMKAT1G31910.1LOC_Os03g48160.1
MVD—-—-
IDIAT3G02780.1LOC_Os07g36190.1
GPPSAT2G34630.2LOC_Os06g46450.1
FPPSAT5G47770.1LOC_Os01g50760.1
FNTAAT3G59380.1LOC_Os09g33930.3
FACE2AT2G36305.1LOC_Os05g28950.1
STE24AT4G01320.1LOC_Os02g45650.1
FOLKAT5G58560.1LOC_Os01g61560.1
FLDHAT4G33360.1LOC_Os03g08624.1
PCMEAT5G15860.1LOC_Os06g49440.1
ICMTAT5G23320.1LOC_Os04g51380.1
PCYOX1AT5G63910.1LOC_Os04g59630.1
DXSAT4G15560.1, AT5G11380.2LOC_Os05g33840.1, LOC_Os06g05100.3
DXRAT5G62790.1LOC_Os01g01710.1
CMK—-—-
MCSAT4G25720.2LOC_Os06g01410.1
HMEDAT5G60600.1LOC_Os02g39160.1
HDRAT4G34350.1LOC_Os03g52170.1
SQSAT3G59380.1LOC_Os09g33930.3
SQLEAT1G58440.1LOC_Os03g12910.1
CASAT2G07050.1LOC_Os02g04710.1
Sterol methyl oxidaseAT1G07420.1,AT1G07420.2,AT4G22753.1, AT2G29390.3,AT2G29390.4,AT2G29390.2,AT4G12110.1LOC_Os11g48020.1, LOC_Os07g01150.3, LOC_Os10g39810.1
Methyl transferaseAT5G13710.2,AT1G20330.1LOC_Os07g10600.2, LOC_Os03g04340.1
Carboxylate-dehydrogenaseAT2G43420.1,AT2G26260.1LOC_Os09g34090.1, LOC_Os03g29170.1
Cytochrome P450AT2G28860.1,AT2G34500.1,AT2G34490.1,AT1G11680.1LOC_Os01g11300.1, LOC_Os01g11340.1, LOC_Os01g11270.1, LOC_Os11g32240.1
Hydroxysteroid- isomerasesAT3G02580.1,AT1G20050.1LOC_Os01g04260.1, LOC_Os01g01369.1
Sterol reductaseAT3G19820.3, AT3G52940.1,AT1G50430.1LOC_Os10g25780.1,LOC_Os10g25780.3, LOC_Os09g39220.1, LOC_Os02g26650.3
Cycloeucalenol cycloisomeraseAT5G50375.1LOC_Os11g19700.1
Methylsterol monooxygenaseAT4G12110.1LOC_Os10g39810.1
Sterol desaturaseAT3G02580.1LOC_Os01g04260.1
Fig 4

Putative biosynthetic pathway of steroidal sapogenin in D. composita.

Key: atoB: acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase, HMGS: hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, HMGR: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, MK: mevalonate kinase, PMK: phosephomevalonate kinase, MVD: diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, DXS: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, DXR: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase, CMC: 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase, CMK: 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase, MCS: 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase, HMED: 4-Hydroxy-3-methy-2-butenyl-diphosphate synthase, HDR: 1-Hydroxy-2-methy-2-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase, IDI: isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase, GPPS: geranyl diphosphate synthase, FPPS: farnesyl diphosphate synthase, FNTA: protein farnesyltransferase, FACE2: prenyl protein peptidase, STE24: endopeptidase, FOLK: farnesol kinase, FLDH: farnesol dehydrogenase, PCME: prenylcysteine alpha-carboxyl methylesterase, ICMT: protein-S-isoprenylcysteine O-methyltransferase, PCYOX1: prenylcysteine oxidase, SQS: squalene synthase, SQLE: squalene monooxygenase, CAS: cycloartenol synthase.

Putative biosynthetic pathway of steroidal sapogenin in D. composita.

Key: atoB: acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase, HMGS: hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, HMGR: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, MK: mevalonate kinase, PMK: phosephomevalonate kinase, MVD: diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, DXS: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, DXR: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase, CMC: 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase, CMK: 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase, MCS: 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase, HMED: 4-Hydroxy-3-methy-2-butenyl-diphosphate synthase, HDR: 1-Hydroxy-2-methy-2-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase, IDI: isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase, GPPS: geranyl diphosphate synthase, FPPS: farnesyl diphosphate synthase, FNTA: protein farnesyltransferase, FACE2: prenyl protein peptidase, STE24: endopeptidase, FOLK: farnesol kinase, FLDH: farnesol dehydrogenase, PCME: prenylcysteine alpha-carboxyl methylesterase, ICMT: protein-S-isoprenylcysteine O-methyltransferase, PCYOX1: prenylcysteine oxidase, SQS: squalene synthase, SQLE: squalene monooxygenase, CAS: cycloartenol synthase. As shown in Fig 4, the complete biosynthetic pathway was divided into three parts according to the KEGG classification of this transcriptome: a steroidal backbone part, a sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid part, and a steroid biosynthesis part. In the first part, the steroidal sapogenin backbones were biosynthesized from acetyl-CoA (C2) to farnesyl diphosphate (C15) in 17 steps which involved 23 enzymes and 47 unigenes. Farnesyl diphosphate was formed by dimethylallyl diphosphate and two isopentenyl diphosphate molecules in a sequential head-to-tail condensation. This process was the same as in terpenoid sapogenin synthesis. Within the sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis section, two farnesyl diphosphate molecules were condensed tail-to-tail style [21]. This was followed by oxidation to form squalene-2,3-epoxide (C30) in 3 steps—2enzymes and 2 unigenes participate in these steps. In contrast to terpenoid sapogenin biosynthesis, squalene-2,3-epoxide transformed to a chair-boat-chair-boat conformation but not a chair-chair-chair-boat one. In the steroidal biosynthesis part, squalene-2,3-epoxide with chair-boat-chair-boat structure was cycled to cycloartenol (C30) which was regarded as the precursor to the steroidal sapogenins [23-25]. Then, the steroidal sapogenins (C28) which are produced underwent various modifications through the action of many enzymes, e.g. cytochrome P450, oxidase, reductase, isomerase, transferase, etc [26]. However, the specific steps involved in steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis from cycloartenol were unclear in the plants of the Dioscoreaceae family.

Expression profiles of 10 transcripts related to the biosynthesis of steroidal sapogenin

D. composita tuber was used as raw material to extract sapogenin. It is interesting to discover whether or not related gene expression is correlated with developmental stages and tissues. The authors used relative quantitative RT-PCR to analyze the expression profiles of 10 transcripts related to steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis using material from the leaves, stems, and tubers of 18-month-old plants. The results are shown in Fig 5. Results show that all the genes selected, except HMED and CYP51, were expressed in the tuber, leaf, and stem of the plant. Five genes (HMGR, MK, SQLE, CYP51, and DHCR7) exhibited their largest expression levels in the tuber. The other five genes (FPPS, DXS, HMED, CAS, and DHCR24) had larger expression levels in the leaves. The expression levels in the tubers and leaves of all the genes selected were much higher than in the stems. This result reveals that the plants produced a variety of compounds by this pathway and their functions were different. Some of the products related to membrane components, e.g. phytosterols, so the related genes were expressed in all tissues [27]. Other compounds, like sapogenins, functioned to counteract pathogens and herbivores, and were mainly biosynthesized and stored in the tubers. The leaves were able to metabolize the triterpenic constituent of leaf wax in their defensive glands [28]. The expression of the genes involved in the MVA pathway (HMGR and MK) was much greater than the genes involved in the MEP pathway (DXS and HMED). This difference between the two pathways indicated that the biosynthesis of steroidal sapogenins chiefly occurred via the MVA pathway in D. composita.
Fig 5

Expression patterns for ten transcripts related to steroidal sapogenin in D. composita.

The tuber, leaf, and stem results relate to plants that are 18-month-old. The shoots results relate to 1-month-old plants. (Key: CYP51: sterol 14-demethylase, DHCR24: delta 24-sterol reductase, DHCR7: 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase.)

Expression patterns for ten transcripts related to steroidal sapogenin in D. composita.

The tuber, leaf, and stem results relate to plants that are 18-month-old. The shoots results relate to 1-month-old plants. (Key: CYP51: sterol 14-demethylase, DHCR24: delta 24-sterol reductase, DHCR7: 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase.) Our study also compared the expression patterns in 1-month-old shoots as well (Fig 5). Compared to 18-month-old plants, 9 genes (all except DXS) were expressed in 1-month-old shoots at much lower levels. These results reveal that the secondary metabolism was not prevalent at the seedling stage which suggests the saponins might not be required for seedling development and survival [29]. The expression of DXS in shoots was higher than in all organs of the 18-month-old plants, which indicates that DXS played a role in producing gibberellins which improved the growth of leaves and budlets [15].

The differences between D. composita and other tuberous plants

To investigate why steroidal sapogenins are synthesized in D. composita more copiously than in other tuberous plants, the gene sequences, protein sequences, conserved domains, and expression quantities of steroids in several tuberous plants were analyzed.

Steroidal sapogenins content

The contents of steroidal sapogenins in D. zingiberensis, Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), and cassava (Manihot esculenta) were compared with that in D. composita (Fig 6). According to the measurements, the steroidal sapogenins content in D. composita was 1.56 times and 52.6 times that of D. zingiberensis and Chinese yam, respectively. There were no steroidal sapogenins determined in potato and cassava.
Fig 6

Content of steroidal sapogenins in potato, cassava, Chinese yam, D. zingiberensis and D. composita (dry weight).

Nucleotide sequences, protein sequences, and conserved domains

Four steroidal sapogenin synthesis-related enzymes: HMGR, CAS, SQS and SMT1 (sterol 24-C-methyltransferase) were chosen for comparison in D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato (there was no relevant data published for Chinese yam and cassava). The results are shown in Tables 6–8. HMGR was involved in a rate-limiting step in the isoprene biosynthesis via the MVA pathway. CAS was a key enzyme in steroidal sapogenin precursor synthesis. SQS produced the triterpene and tetraterpene precursors for many diverse sterol and carotenoid end products. SMT1 was ‘in charge’ of protein structure modification. All the blast analyses were completed online through the NCBI website, and the conserved domains of HMGR, CAS, SQS, and SMT1 in D. composita were calculated online using CDD v3.11–45746 PSSMs on the NCBI site.
Table 6

The identity of nucleotide sequences in D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato.

GenePlantAccessionLength (bp)Query coverIdentity
HMGR D. composita 2409
D. zingiberensis KC960674.1207789%90%
PotatoL01400.12379NoNo
CAS D. composita 3227
D. zingiberensis AM697885.1270384%89%
PotatoXM_006362747.12616NoNo
SQS D. composita 1825
D. zingiberensis KC960673.1145386%89%
PotatoJF802610.11236NoNo
SMT1 D. composita 5718
D. zingiberensis FR714840.1145968%89%
PotatoXM_006364446.11372NoNo
Table 8

The comparison of conserved domains in D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato.

ProteinName of conserved domainsPlantIdentity
HMGR HMG-CoA_reductase_classI D. composita
D. zingiberensis 93%
Potato82%
CAS SQCY_1 D. composita
D. zingiberensis 90%
Potato78%
SQS Trans_IPPS_HH D. composita
D. zingiberensis 94%
Potato84%
SMT1 Sterol_MT_C D. composita
D. zingiberensis 79%
Potato30%

Key: HMG-CoA_reductase_classI: Class I hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, accession: cd00643; SQCY_1: Squalene cyclase domain subgroup 1, accession: cd02892; Trans_IPPS_HH: Trans-Isoprenyl Diphosphate Synthases, accession: cd00683; Sterol_MT_C: Sterol methyltransferase C-terminal, accession: pfam08498.

Key: HMG-CoA_reductase_classI: Class I hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, accession: cd00643; SQCY_1: Squalene cyclase domain subgroup 1, accession: cd02892; Trans_IPPS_HH: Trans-Isoprenyl Diphosphate Synthases, accession: cd00683; Sterol_MT_C: Sterol methyltransferase C-terminal, accession: pfam08498. For HMGR, CAS, SQS, and SMT1, the gene sequences (above 89%), protein sequences (above 90%), and conserved domains (above 79%) were similar in D. composita and D. zingiberensis. This suggests that the four enzymes were produced with quite consistent structure and function in closely related plants like D. composita and D. zingiberensis, so the related metabolic pathways and products might be extremely similar. In potato, the protein sequences and conserved domains of HMGR, CAS, and SQS were more dissimilar and SMT1 had little similarity with D. composita—the gene sequences had no similarity with D. composita. This means that HMGR, CAS, and SQS had some structural similarity in D. composita and potato, but the products in potato might involve carotenoids or other lipids rather than steroidal sapogenins [29]. The structure and function of SMT1 in potato were different from that in D. composita, especially in the Sterol_MT_C domain. SMT1 had another conserved domain which used adenosylmethionine as a substrate for methyl transfer. Thus, it might catalyze the methionine methyl transference instead of the sterol in potato.

Expression of four specific genes

The expression of 4 genes related to steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis in the tuber of D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato was analyzed by relative quantitative RT-PCR. The results are shown in Fig 7. The expression of HMGR, CAS, SQS, and SMT1 in D. composita was found to be 2.0, 159.1, 3.4, and 8.9 times that in D. zingiberensis, respectively. Therefore, steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis was more rapid and efficient in D. composita. The natural role of steroidal sapogenins is to confer protection against potential pathogens [9]. It is thought it might play a part in defense-related signaling processes in the presence of pathogen infection [30]. D. zingiberensis has been cultivated as a medicine in favorable planting conditions for several decades, so the capacity of its defense response might have degenerated without frequent pathogen accumulation. Conversely, D. composita has been living in the wild and has better maintained its defense capability.
Fig 7

Expression of four transcripts related to steroidal sapogenin in the tuber of D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato.

The D. composita and D. zingiberensis samples came from 18-month-old plants, and the samples of potato from 6-month-old plants.

Expression of four transcripts related to steroidal sapogenin in the tuber of D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato.

The D. composita and D. zingiberensis samples came from 18-month-old plants, and the samples of potato from 6-month-old plants. The expressions of HMGR, SQS, and SMT1 in D. composita were 2.8, 7.3, and 27.9 times greater than in potato, respectively. CAS was hardly expressed in potato at all. There were no steroidal sapogenins synthesized in potato because it lacked a key enzyme in its metabolic pathway. In fact, all the data related to CAS in potato in the public domain had been predicted though genome sequencing [31]. CAS might exist as a non-functional gene in potato. Evolution, maybe, was one of the important reasons for this difference (different genera of plants producing different antimicrobial compounds to resist different environments in the course of evolution).

Conclusions

Steroidal sapogenins are generally considered to be part of the defense system in plants. They have recently been attracting some interests due to their wide spectrum of biological, pharmacological, economical, and medicinal importance. Some species of Dioscoreaceae, like D. zingiberensis, are utilized mainly as a material to extract steroidal sapogenins for the medicinal industry [5]. As a novel resource, the quantity and quality of steroidal sapogenins in D. composita are exceptional. Determination of the genes involved in this secondary metabolism should allow researchers to improve the production of its effective constituents by the various techniques of molecular biology and metabolic regulation. Despite the recent great improvements in sequencing technology, no genomic data were available for consultation for any of the Dioscoreaceae species. In this work, we generated 27,720 unigenes through transcriptome sequencing, and predicted a pathway for steroidal sapogenin backbone biosynthesis in D. composita. Of these unigenes, 531 were obtained that relate to secondary metabolism, of which, 79 unigenes were associated with steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis. There were 21 steps in the pathway from acetyl-CoA to cycloartenol, the precursor of steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis [32]. A variety of steroidal sapogenins were produced through complex modification of cycloartenol, for example, the catalysis of stereospecific P450 cytochromes, but this process was unclear [33]. The expression profiles of 10 related transcripts revealed that all the organs involved in this pathway, gene expression was the largest in the tubers and leaves. This was because the products of this pathway included membrane and defense constituents. The low expression observed in shoots suggested that the secondary metabolism was not prevalent at the seedling stage. Through a comparison with D. zingiberensis, the expression of 4 related genes were found to be the greater in D. composita, and result in greater enrichment of steroidal sapogenins in D. composita. This may be caused by the stronger defense response in D. composita. No expression of key enzymes led to a lack of steroidal sapogenins in potato. This preliminary information allows us to understand the biosynthetic pathway of steroidal sapogenins in D. composita, and should serve as a foundation for manipulating the secondary metabolism to produce health-promoting ingredients. In addition, the transcriptome data we have derived constitutes a much more abundant genetic resource that can be utilized to benefit further in-depth studies on D. composita.

Material and Methods

Plant material

No specific permissions were required for the field studies in Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China. It was, however, confirmed that these studies did not involve endangered or protected species. The GPS coordinates of the location of the field studies is 24.305984559949003, 113.96962703698728. D. composita samples were collected from 18-month-old plants and 1-month-old shoots (counted from field planting) that were cultivated in Shaoguan. For the 18-month-old plants, leaves, stems, and tubers were separately harvested from six plant individuals. Samples were cut and mixed using samples from the top, middle, and bottom parts of the same tissues from an individual. For the 1-month-old shoots, six whole plants were collected. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after cleaning with germ-free water, and stored at—80°C before use. D. zingiberensis tuber samples were collected from 18-month-old plants, Chinese yam tuber samples were collected from 9-month-old plants, potato tuber samples were collected from 6-month-old plants, and cassava tuber samples were collected from 12-month-old plants. All of these were cultivated in Shaoguan. For each kind of plant, samples were separately harvested from six individuals, cut, and the samples from the top, middle, and bottom parts of the tuber from each individual mixed.

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was isolated by using a TIANDZ Column Plant RNAout 2.0 (with DNase) from various organs and development stages, respectively. The quality and concentration of RNA were detected by electrophoresis and a Backman Counter (DU730). Parts of the RNA from different organs (18-month-old plants) were mixed together in equal measure and sent to NOVOGENE (Beijing, China) where the cDNA library was established and Illumina sequencing was completed. The remaining RNA from different tissues (18-month-old plants), RNA extracted from 1-month-old shoots, and RNA from different plants were used for real-time PCR analysis. About 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into single-stranded cDNA using a TaKaRa PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) for each sample. The cDNA solutions were diluted 10 times for templates in real-time PCR.

Steroidal sapogenin determination

Freeze-dried powdered tuber (1 g) was hydrolyzed with hydrochloric acid (2 M) by boiling in a water bath for 4 h. This was filtered and the residue washed to neutral. It was then dried at 80°C. The residue was put into a soxhlet extractor with filter paper package, refluxed with petroleum ether (80°C) for 4 h. The petroleum ether was eevaporated and the residue dissolved in chloroform, diluting it to 10 mL. Steroidal sapogenin extractions were measured using capillary gas chromatography (GC7890II) equipped with a TM-5 Stainless steel capillary column (30 m × 0.20 mm × 0.25 μm) and a flame ionization detector. Other parameters include: column temperature: 270°C; column head pressure: 123 kPa; vaporizer temperature: 330°C; detector temperature: 310°C; N2 flow rate (carrier gas): 2.0 mL/min; split ratio: 40:1; volume injected: 10 μL. Standard sapogenin (purchased from Fluka) was dissolved in chloroform.

Real-time PCR and expression analysis

The primers of 12 selected transcripts were designed online using Primer-NCBI. The quantitative reactions were finished with TaKaRa SYBR Premix ExTaq II (TliRNaseH Plus) on Eppendorf Mastercycler Real-Time Thermal Cylers. PCR conditions: 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 20 s. The expressions of selected genes were normalized against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) which was an internal reference gene. Moreover, the relative expression was counted using the 2–ΔΔCt method. All real-time PCR experiments were repeated using three biological, and three technical, replications.

Accession of data

The raw data have been submitted to Sequence Read Archive of NCBI with accession numbers: SRR1525775, SRR1525776, SRR1525777, SRR1525779, SRR1525790, SRR1525791, SRR1525792, and SRR1525793.

Software

Trinity (v2012-10-15), http://sourceforge.net/projects/trinitynaseq/files/ Blastx (v2.2.27+), ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/LATEST/ Hmmscan (HMMER 3.0), http://hmmer.janelia.org/software/ KAAS (r140224), http://www.genome.jp/tools/kass/

Annotations against NR.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Annotations against Arabidopsis protein database.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Annotations against Rice protein database.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Annotations against KEGG.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.

Annotations against Pfam.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.

Putative unigenes related to steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
Table 7

The identity of protein sequences in D. composita, D. zingiberensis, and potato.

ProteinPlantAccessionLength (aa)Query coverIdentity
HMGR D. composita 580
D. zingiberensis AGN32411.158596%92%
PotatoAAA93498.1596100%66%
CAS D. composita 759
D. zingiberensis CAM91422.1759100%90%
PotatoXP_006362809.175799%77%
SQS D. composita 408
D. zingiberensis AGN32410.140995%91%
PotatoAEX26929.141194%76%
SMT1 D. composita 345
D. zingiberensis CBX33151.133399%93%
PotatoXP_006364508.135889%40%
  22 in total

1.  Manipulation of saponin biosynthesis by RNA interference-mediated silencing of β-amyrin synthase gene expression in soybean.

Authors:  Kyoko Takagi; Keito Nishizawa; Aya Hirose; Akiko Kita; Masao Ishimoto
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  De novo transcriptome sequencing in Salvia miltiorrhiza to identify genes involved in the biosynthesis of active ingredients.

Authors:  Hua Wenping; Zhang Yuan; Song Jie; Zhao Lijun; Wang Zhezhi
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Transcriptomes of the desiccation-tolerant resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum.

Authors:  Maria C Suarez Rodriguez; Daniel Edsgärd; Syed S Hussain; David Alquezar; Morten Rasmussen; Thomas Gilbert; Bjørn H Nielsen; Dorothea Bartels; John Mundy
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 4.  The genetics and molecular genetics of terpene and sterol origami.

Authors:  Joe Chappell
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 5.  Molecular activities, biosynthesis and evolution of triterpenoid saponins.

Authors:  Jörg M Augustin; Vera Kuzina; Sven B Andersen; Søren Bak
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Penny Coggill; Andreas Heger; Joanne E Pollington; O Luke Gavin; Prasad Gunasekaran; Goran Ceric; Kristoffer Forslund; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Plant antimicrobial agents and their effects on plant and human pathogens.

Authors:  Rocío González-Lamothe; Gabriel Mitchell; Mariza Gattuso; Moussa S Diarra; François Malouin; Kamal Bouarab
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato.

Authors:  Xun Xu; Shengkai Pan; Shifeng Cheng; Bo Zhang; Desheng Mu; Peixiang Ni; Gengyun Zhang; Shuang Yang; Ruiqiang Li; Jun Wang; Gisella Orjeda; Frank Guzman; Michael Torres; Roberto Lozano; Olga Ponce; Diana Martinez; Germán De la Cruz; S K Chakrabarti; Virupaksh U Patil; Konstantin G Skryabin; Boris B Kuznetsov; Nikolai V Ravin; Tatjana V Kolganova; Alexey V Beletsky; Andrei V Mardanov; Alex Di Genova; Daniel M Bolser; David M A Martin; Guangcun Li; Yu Yang; Hanhui Kuang; Qun Hu; Xingyao Xiong; Gerard J Bishop; Boris Sagredo; Nilo Mejía; Wlodzimierz Zagorski; Robert Gromadka; Jan Gawor; Pawel Szczesny; Sanwen Huang; Zhonghua Zhang; Chunbo Liang; Jun He; Ying Li; Ying He; Jianfei Xu; Youjun Zhang; Binyan Xie; Yongchen Du; Dongyu Qu; Merideth Bonierbale; Marc Ghislain; Maria del Rosario Herrera; Giovanni Giuliano; Marco Pietrella; Gaetano Perrotta; Paolo Facella; Kimberly O'Brien; Sergio E Feingold; Leandro E Barreiro; Gabriela A Massa; Luis Diambra; Brett R Whitty; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Haining Lin; Alicia N Massa; Michael Geoffroy; Steven Lundback; Dean DellaPenna; C Robin Buell; Sanjeev Kumar Sharma; David F Marshall; Robbie Waugh; Glenn J Bryan; Marialaura Destefanis; Istvan Nagy; Dan Milbourne; Susan J Thomson; Mark Fiers; Jeanne M E Jacobs; Kåre L Nielsen; Mads Sønderkær; Marina Iovene; Giovana A Torres; Jiming Jiang; Richard E Veilleux; Christian W B Bachem; Jan de Boer; Theo Borm; Bjorn Kloosterman; Herman van Eck; Erwin Datema; Bas te Lintel Hekkert; Aska Goverse; Roeland C H J van Ham; Richard G F Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  De novo sequencing and characterization of floral transcriptome in two species of buckwheat (Fagopyrum).

Authors:  Maria D Logacheva; Artem S Kasianov; Dmitriy V Vinogradov; Tagir H Samigullin; Mikhail S Gelfand; Vsevolod J Makeev; Aleksey A Penin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome.

Authors:  Manfred G Grabherr; Brian J Haas; Moran Yassour; Joshua Z Levin; Dawn A Thompson; Ido Amit; Xian Adiconis; Lin Fan; Raktima Raychowdhury; Qiandong Zeng; Zehua Chen; Evan Mauceli; Nir Hacohen; Andreas Gnirke; Nicholas Rhind; Federica di Palma; Bruce W Birren; Chad Nusbaum; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Nir Friedman; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  8 in total

1.  Identification, characterization and expression analysis of genes involved in steroidal saponin biosynthesis in Dracaena cambodiana.

Authors:  Jia-Hong Zhu; Hui-Liang Li; Dong Guo; Ying Wang; Hao-Fu Dai; Wen-Li Mei; Shi-Qing Peng
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  De novo assembly and annotation of the Zhe-Maidong (Ophiopogon japonicus (L.f.) Ker-Gawl) transcriptome in different growth stages.

Authors:  Huijun Liu; Ying Wang; Tingzhang Wang; Xuhui Ying; Rongrong Wu; Huan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Spatial transcriptome analysis provides insights of key gene(s) involved in steroidal saponin biosynthesis in medicinally important herb Trillium govanianum.

Authors:  Pradeep Singh; Gagandeep Singh; Abhishek Bhandawat; Gopal Singh; Rajni Parmar; Romit Seth; Ram Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Next-generation sequencing of representational difference analysis products for identification of genes involved in diosgenin biosynthesis in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum).

Authors:  Joanna Ciura; Magdalena Szeliga; Michalina Grzesik; Mirosław Tyrka
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  A customized nuclear target enrichment approach for developing a phylogenomic baseline for Dioscorea yams (Dioscoreaceae).

Authors:  Marybel Soto Gomez; Lisa Pokorny; Michael B Kantar; Félix Forest; Ilia J Leitch; Barbara Gravendeel; Paul Wilkin; Sean W Graham; Juan Viruel
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  The genome of Dioscorea zingiberensis sheds light on the biosynthesis, origin and evolution of the medicinally important diosgenin saponins.

Authors:  Yi Li; Chao Tan; Zihao Li; Jingzhe Guo; Song Li; Xin Chen; Chen Wang; Xiaokang Dai; Huan Yang; Wei Song; Lixiu Hou; Jiali Xu; Ziyu Tong; Anran Xu; Xincheng Yuan; Weipeng Wang; Qingyong Yang; Lingling Chen; Zongyi Sun; Kai Wang; Bo Pan; Jianghua Chen; Yinghua Bao; Faguang Liu; Xiaoquan Qi; David R Gang; Jun Wen; Jiaru Li
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 7.  Recent advances in steroidal saponins biosynthesis and in vitro production.

Authors:  Swati Upadhyay; Gajendra Singh Jeena; Rakesh Kumar Shukla
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Illuminating the Plant Rhabdovirus Landscape through Metatranscriptomics Data.

Authors:  Nicolás Bejerman; Ralf G Dietzgen; Humberto Debat
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.048

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.