Literature DB >> 25860444

Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients.

Mette Krag1, Anders Perner, Jørn Wetterslev, Matt P Wise, Mark Borthwick, Stepani Bendel, Colin McArthur, Deborah Cook, Niklas Nielsen, Paolo Pelosi, Frederik Keus, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Alma D Moller, Morten Hylander Møller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of, risk factors for, and prognostic importance of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients.
METHODS: We included adults without GI bleeding who were acutely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during a 7-day period. The primary outcome was clinically important GI bleeding in ICU, and the analyses included estimations of baseline risk factors and potential associations with 90-day mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 1,034 patients in 97 ICUs in 11 countries were included. Clinically important GI bleeding occurred in 2.6 % (95 % confidence interval 1.6-3.6 %) of patients. The following variables at ICU admission were independently associated with clinically important GI bleeding: three or more co-existing diseases (odds ratio 8.9, 2.7-28.8), co-existing liver disease (7.6, 3.3-17.6), use of renal replacement therapy (6.9, 2.7-17.5), co-existing coagulopathy (5.2, 2.3-11.8), acute coagulopathy (4.2, 1.7-10.2), use of acid suppressants (3.6, 1.3-10.2) and higher organ failure score (1.4, 1.2-1.5). In ICU, 73 % (71-76 %) of patients received acid suppressants; most received proton pump inhibitors. In patients with clinically important GI bleeding, crude and adjusted odds for mortality were 3.7 (1.7-8.0) and 1.7 (0.7-4.3), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In ICU patients clinically important GI bleeding is rare, and acid suppressants are frequently used. Co-existing diseases, liver failure, coagulopathy and organ failures are the main risk factors for GI bleeding. Clinically important GI bleeding was not associated with increased adjusted 90-day mortality, which largely can be explained by severity of comorbidity, other organ failures and age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25860444     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3725-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  38 in total

1.  Gastric colonization and pneumonia in intubated critically ill patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  N M Apte; D R Karnad; T P Medhekar; G H Tilve; S Morye; G G Bhave
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.

Authors:  Laine Thomas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Reporting and handling missing values in clinical studies in intensive care units.

Authors:  Aurélien Vesin; Elie Azoulay; Stéphane Ruckly; Lucile Vignoud; Kateřina Rusinovà; Dominique Benoit; Marcio Soares; Paulo Azeivedo-Maia; Fekri Abroug; Judith Benbenishty; Jean Francois Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Describing ICU data with tables.

Authors:  Corinne Alberti; Rym Boulkedid
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock.

Authors:  Lars B Holst; Nicolai Haase; Jørn Wetterslev; Jan Wernerman; Anne B Guttormsen; Sari Karlsson; Pär I Johansson; Anders Aneman; Marianne L Vang; Robert Winding; Lars Nebrich; Helle L Nibro; Bodil S Rasmussen; Johnny R M Lauridsen; Jane S Nielsen; Anders Oldner; Ville Pettilä; Maria B Cronhjort; Lasse H Andersen; Ulf G Pedersen; Nanna Reiter; Jørgen Wiis; Jonathan O White; Lene Russell; Klaus J Thornberg; Peter B Hjortrup; Rasmus G Müller; Morten H Møller; Morten Steensen; Inga Tjäder; Kristina Kilsand; Suzanne Odeberg-Wernerman; Brit Sjøbø; Helle Bundgaard; Maria A Thyø; David Lodahl; Rikke Mærkedahl; Carsten Albeck; Dorte Illum; Mary Kruse; Per Winkel; Anders Perner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in stress-induced gastric mucosal injury.

Authors:  P H van der Voort; R W van der Hulst; D F Zandstra; A A Geraedts; A van der Ende; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients with and without stress-ulcer prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christophe Faisy; Emmanuel Guerot; Jean-Luc Diehl; Eléonore Iftimovici; Jean-Yves Fagon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Pharmacoepidemiology of stress ulcer prophylaxis in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Salmaan Kanji; Robert MacLaren; Ishaq Lat; Brian L Erstad
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.425

9.  Prospective endoscopic study of stress erosions and ulcers in critically ill adult patients treated with either sucralfate or placebo.

Authors:  J M Eddleston; R C Pearson; J Holland; J A Tooth; A Vohra; B H Doran
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Robert MacLaren; Paul M Reynolds; Richard R Allen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  71 in total

1.  Primum non nocere and challenging conventional treatment.

Authors:  Adam M Deane; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Trials on stress ulcer prophylaxis: finding the balance between benefit and harm.

Authors:  Mette Krag; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Matt P Wise; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Trials on stress ulcer prophylaxis: finding the balance between benefit and harm. Response to Krag et al.

Authors:  Adam M Deane; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  [Additive therapies : Intensive care studies from 2018-2019].

Authors:  M Dietrich; C J Reuß; C Beynon; A Hecker; C Jungk; D Michalski; C Nusshag; K Schmidt; M A Weigand; M Bernhard; T Brenner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding by means of proton pump inhibitors].

Authors:  M Götz; S Nitschmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  What's new with stress ulcer prophylaxis in the ICU?

Authors:  Søren Marker; Mette Krag; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Focus on transfusion, bleeding and thrombosis.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Yaseen Arabi; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Is research from databases reliable? No.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Rinaldo Bellomo; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Epinephrine Dose Has a Preventive Effect on the Occurrence of Stress Ulcer-Induced Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Aymeric Becq; Saik Urien; Maximilien Barret; Christophe Faisy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  [Evidence-based interdisciplinary treatment of abdominal sepsis].

Authors:  T Schmoch; M Al-Saeedi; A Hecker; D C Richter; T Brenner; T Hackert; M A Weigand
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.