Literature DB >> 2586017

Quantification of the heart rate-independent vasodepressor component in carotid sinus syndrome.

R Griebenow1, L Krämer, H M Steffen, H J Schäfer.   

Abstract

In 45 patients with carotid sinus syndrome, the heart rate-independent vasodepressor component under ventricular and av-sequential pacing of the heart was investigated both in supine and in standing patients. Under both forms of pacing, the carotid pressure determination has led to a marked lowering of systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure which is significantly more pronounced under orthostasis. The blood pressure values reached both in supine and in standing patients are significantly higher under av-sequential pacing than under ventricular pacing. Accordingly, the proportion of symptomatic patients is less under av-sequential pacing in the supine position (17% versus 29%) and in standing (65% versus 83%). The heart rate-independent vasodepressor reaction is maximal on average between 11 s and 16 s after the beginning of the carotid pressure test and persists for 3 s to 7 s. The blood pressure reaches initial values again after 14 s to 20 s. To summarize, these data document that a clinically relevant heart rate-independent vasodepressor reaction is to be reckoned with in the majority of patients with carotid sinus syndrome. This shows a different time course than the vagally determined effect of the carotid sinus reflex on heart rate. Orthostasis intensifies the vasodepressor reaction so that the hemodynamically more favorable av-sequential pacing which is actually more favorable in hemodynamic terms cannot guarantee freedom from symptoms in the majority of patients in the upright standing position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2586017     DOI: 10.1007/bf01726114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  10 in total

1.  Reflex peripheral venoconstriction induced by carotid occlusion.

Authors:  E W SALZMAN
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Effect of carotid pressoreceptor stimulation on integrated systemic venous bed.

Authors:  E R Müller-Ruchholtz; E Grund; F Hauer; E R Lapp
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  Vagal role and pacemaker indication in hypersensitive carotid sinus reflex.

Authors:  J Thormann; F Schwarz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiol       Date:  1975-06

4.  Carotid sinus reflex in patients undergoing coronary angiography: relationship of degree and location of coronary artery disease to response to carotid sinus massage.

Authors:  K A Brown; J D Maloney; C H Smith; G O Haritzler; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Circulatory effects of stimulating the carotid arterial stretch receptors in man at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  B S Bevegård; J T Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Carotid sinus hypersensitivity: beneficial effects of dual-chamber pacing.

Authors:  N P Madigan; G C Flaker; J J Curtis; J Reid; K J Mueller; T J Murphy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Three cases of hypotension and syncope with ventricular pacing: possible role of atrial reflexes.

Authors:  C Alicandri; F M Fouad; R C Tarazi; L Castle; V Morant
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Carotid sinus hypersensitivity: evaluation of the vasodepressor component.

Authors:  A Almquist; C Gornick; W Benson; A Dunnigan; D G Benditt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  [Vagal effect on sino-atrial node frequency and A-V overdrive in hypersensitive carotid sinus reflex and sick sinus syndrome].

Authors:  F Schwarz; J Thormann; H Zimmermann
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1975-02-22

10.  Hypotension with ventricular pacing: an atria vasodepressor reflex in human beings.

Authors:  J A Erlebacher; R L Danner; P E Stelzer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 24.094

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.