Literature DB >> 25859942

Protein-protein interaction databases.

Damian Szklarczyk1, Lars Juhl Jensen.   

Abstract

Years of meticulous curation of scientific literature and increasingly reliable computational predictions have resulted in creation of vast databases of protein interaction data. Over the years, these repositories have become a basic framework in which experiments are analyzed and new directions of research are explored. Here we present an overview of the most widely used protein-protein interaction databases and the methods they employ to gather, combine, and predict interactions. We also point out the trade-off between comprehensiveness and accuracy and the main pitfall scientists have to be aware before adopting protein interaction databases in any single-gene or genome-wide analysis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25859942     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2425-7_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  24 in total

1.  A graph-embedded deep feedforward network for disease outcome classification and feature selection using gene expression data.

Authors:  Yunchuan Kong; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  MIPPIE: the mouse integrated protein-protein interaction reference.

Authors:  Gregorio Alanis-Lobato; Jannik S Möllmann; Martin H Schaefer; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Bayesian network feature finder (BANFF): an R package for gene network feature selection.

Authors:  Zhou Lan; Yize Zhao; Jian Kang; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Techniques for the Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions in Vivo.

Authors:  Shuping Xing; Niklas Wallmeroth; Kenneth W Berendzen; Christopher Grefen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Detecting subnetwork-level dynamic correlations.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Shangzhao Qiu; Zhuxuan Jin; Sihong Gong; Yun Bai; Jianwei Lu; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  forgeNet: a graph deep neural network model using tree-based ensemble classifiers for feature graph construction.

Authors:  Yunchuan Kong; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  [Proteome analysis of undiluted vitreous humor in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion].

Authors:  I Dacheva; M Reich; M Nobl; K Ceglowska; J Wasiak; J Siwy; P Zürbig; H Mischak; F H J Koch; J Kopitz; F T A Kretz; T Tandogan; G U Auffarth; M J Koss
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  The Long-Lasting Rodenticide Brodifacoum Induces Neuropathology in Adult Male Rats.

Authors:  Sergey Kalinin; Natalia Marangoni; Katarzyna Kowal; Arunangsu Dey; Kinga Lis; Sergey Brodsky; Richard van Breemen; Zane Hauck; Richard Ripper; Israel Rubinstein; Guy Weinberg; Douglas L Feinstein
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  PD-L1, inflammation, non-coding RNAs, and neuroblastoma: Immuno-oncology perspective.

Authors:  Palanisamy Nallasamy; Srinivas Chava; Sumit S Verma; Shruti Mishra; Santhi Gorantla; Don W Coulter; Siddappa N Byrareddy; Surinder K Batra; Subash C Gupta; Kishore B Challagundla
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 15.707

10.  Type 3 innate lymphoid cells are associated with a successful intestinal transplant.

Authors:  Jiman Kang; Katrina Loh; Leonid Belyayev; Priscilla Cha; Mohammed Sadat; Khalid Khan; Yuriy Gusev; Krithika Bhuvaneshwar; Habtom Ressom; Sangeetha Moturi; Jason Kaiser; Jason Hawksworth; Simon C Robson; Cal S Matsumoto; Michael Zasloff; Thomas M Fishbein; Alexander Kroemer
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.