Renata E Howland1, Ann M Madsen1, Leze Nicaj2, Rebecca S Noe3, Mary Casey-Lockyer4, Elizabeth Begier1. 1. 1Bureau of Vital Statistics,New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,New York,New York. 2. 2Office of Chief Medical Examiner,New York,New York. 3. 3National Center for Environmental Health,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Chamblee,Georgia. 4. 4Disaster Health Services,The American Red Cross,Washington,DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We briefly describe 2 systems that provided disaster-related mortality surveillance during and after Hurricane Sandy in New York City, namely, the New York City Health Department Electronic Death Registration System (EDRS) and the American Red Cross paper-based tracking system. METHODS: Red Cross fatality data were linked with New York City EDRS records by using decedent name and date of birth. We analyzed cases identified by both systems for completeness and agreement across selected variables and the time interval between death and reporting in the system. RESULTS: Red Cross captured 93% (41/44) of all Sandy-related deaths; the completeness and quality varied by item, and timeliness was difficult to determine. The circumstances leading to death captured by Red Cross were particularly useful for identifying reasons individuals stayed in evacuation zones. EDRS variables were nearly 100% complete, and the median interval between date of death and reporting was 6 days (range: 0-43 days). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that a number of steps have the potential to improve disaster-related mortality surveillance, including updating Red Cross surveillance forms and electronic databases to enhance timeliness assessments, greater collaboration across agencies to share and use data for public health preparedness, and continued expansion of electronic death registration systems.
OBJECTIVE: We briefly describe 2 systems that provided disaster-related mortality surveillance during and after Hurricane Sandy in New York City, namely, the New York City Health Department Electronic Death Registration System (EDRS) and the American Red Cross paper-based tracking system. METHODS: Red Cross fatality data were linked with New York City EDRS records by using decedent name and date of birth. We analyzed cases identified by both systems for completeness and agreement across selected variables and the time interval between death and reporting in the system. RESULTS: Red Cross captured 93% (41/44) of all Sandy-related deaths; the completeness and quality varied by item, and timeliness was difficult to determine. The circumstances leading to death captured by Red Cross were particularly useful for identifying reasons individuals stayed in evacuation zones. EDRS variables were nearly 100% complete, and the median interval between date of death and reporting was 6 days (range: 0-43 days). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that a number of steps have the potential to improve disaster-related mortality surveillance, including updating Red Cross surveillance forms and electronic databases to enhance timeliness assessments, greater collaboration across agencies to share and use data for public health preparedness, and continued expansion of electronic death registration systems.
Authors: Cindy H Chiu; Amy H Schnall; Caitlin E Mertzlufft; Rebecca S Noe; Amy F Wolkin; Jeanne Spears; Mary Casey-Lockyer; Sara J Vagi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Noha H Farag; Araceli Rey; Rebecca Noe; Tesfaye Bayleyegn; April D Wood; David Zane Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Jesse E Bell; Claudia Langford Brown; Kathryn Conlon; Stephanie Herring; Kenneth E Kunkel; Jay Lawrimore; George Luber; Carl Schreck; Adam Smith; Christopher Uejio Journal: J Air Waste Manag Assoc Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.636