Literature DB >> 25859620

Why do some South African ethnic groups have very high HIV rates and others not?

Chris Kenyon1, Sizwe Zondo.   

Abstract

The differences in HIV prevalence between South Africa's racial/ethnic groups (19.9%, 3.2%, and 0.5% among 15-49-year-old blacks, coloureds and whites, respectively) are as big as those between the countries with the highest and lowest levels of HIV prevalence worldwide. These large racial/ethnic differences are largely determined by different sexual network structures. In networks among black South Africans, sexual partnerships are more likely to be arranged concurrently - a configuration that leads to exponential increases in the spread of HIV. An examination of the historical origins of polygamy (where it is normative for partnerships to be arranged concurrently) and monogamy (serial or lifetime) reveals that it is the practice of universal monogamy in stratified societies which is the outlier. The ideology and practice of universal monogamy originated in Europe as the result of several factors, most prominently conflicts between the Christian Church and the nobility. After its imposition in Europe, the European colonial project would see this ideology disseminated around the world. Under the influence of liberalism it would mutate into a secular and unacknowledged value-programme of monogamy as a universal norm. This value-programme and practice of monogamy (mostly serial) is still the norm for white South Africans; thus, this sexual behaviour 'spandrel' (by-product of other historical processes) is a large contributor to the lower levels of HIV prevalence among whites. In pre-colonial African societies, polygyny was normative, and the Christian value-programme of monogamy never achieved the hegemonic status it did in Europe and other areas of conquest. Married black African men who converted to Christianity were no less likely to have additional sexual partners, but only more likely to conceal them. The ongoing secrecy about having concurrent partners has contributed to the connectedness of sexual networks among black Africans at large and in this manner has contributed to the rapid spread of HIV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  concurrency; epidemiology; khwapeni; liberalism; marriage; monogamy; polygamy; social attitudes survey

Year:  2011        PMID: 25859620     DOI: 10.2989/16085906.2011.575548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J AIDS Res        ISSN: 1608-5906            Impact factor:   1.300


  4 in total

1.  Thank Martin Luther that ciprofloxacin could cure your gonorrhoea? Ecological association between Protestantism and antimicrobial consumption in 30 European countries.

Authors:  Chris Kenyon; Geoffrey Fatti
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-10-06

2.  Variations in sexual network connectivity may explain dramatic variations in sexually transmitted infection prevalence between populations and over time: a selected four-country analysis.

Authors:  Chris Kenyon
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-08-20

3.  Strong associations between national prevalence of various STIs suggests sexual network connectivity is a common underpinning risk factor.

Authors:  Chris Kenyon
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Could differences in implicit attitudes to sexual concurrency play a role in generalized HIV epidemics?

Authors:  Sizwe Zondo; Jacques van Lankveld; Chris R Kenyon; Kenny Wolfs; Kara Osbak; Maleeto Malataliana; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.