| Literature DB >> 25859331 |
Henrique Furstenau Togashi1, Iain Colin Prentice2, Bradley John Evans1, David Ian Forrester3, Paul Drake4, Paul Feikema5, Kim Brooksbank6, Derek Eamus7, Daniel Taylor1.
Abstract
The leaf area-to-sapwood area ratio (LA:SA) is a key plant trait that links photosynthesis to transpiration. The pipe model theory states that the sapwood cross-sectional area of a stem or branch at any point should scale isometrically with the area of leaves distal to that point. Optimization theory further suggests that LA:SA should decrease toward drier climates. Although acclimation of LA:SA to climate has been reported within species, much less is known about the scaling of this trait with climate among species. We compiled LA:SA measurements from 184 species of Australian evergreen angiosperm trees. The pipe model was broadly confirmed, based on measurements on branches and trunks of trees from one to 27 years old. Despite considerable scatter in LA:SA among species, quantile regression showed strong (0.2 < R1 < 0.65) positive relationships between two climatic moisture indices and the lowermost (5%) and uppermost (5-15%) quantiles of log LA:SA, suggesting that moisture availability constrains the envelope of minimum and maximum values of LA:SA typical for any given climate. Interspecific differences in plant hydraulic conductivity are probably responsible for the large scatter of values in the mid-quantile range and may be an important determinant of tree morphology.Entities:
Keywords: Climatic moisture; leaf area; pipe model; plant hydraulics; sapwood area; tree morphology
Year: 2015 PMID: 25859331 PMCID: PMC4377269 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Geographic distribution of measured leaf area-to-sapwood area (LA:SA) ratios. The mapped climate variable is the Cramer–Prentice α index of moisture availability (average between 1970 and 2000) calculated from AWAP data (http://www.eoc.csiro.au/awap/). The white line shows the limit between May to September north dry season and October to April south dry season.
Figure 2Standardized major axis (SMA) regression between log-transformed leaf area (log LA) and sapwood area (log SA) for 184 tree species across Australia. Units are in m2. Open circles and filled squares are observations in branches and whole trees, respectively. The solid line represents the SMA linear regression, and the dashed line shows the line obtained when the slope was constrained to 1. The allometric equations are given in the text.
Figure 3Relationship between log-transformed leaf area-to-sapwood area ratio (log LA/SA) and log tree height in 39 angiosperm tree species. Open circles and filled squares are observations in branches and whole trees, respectively.
Figure 4Filled points and open circles are LA/SA observations in whole trees and branches, respectively. The left panels show quantile linear regressions lines in gray (τ = 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 0.95) and ordinary least-squares linear regression line in black, for log-transformed leaf area-to-sapwood area ratio (log LA/SA) as a function of annual (A) and decadal (C) values of α. The right panels show the corresponding P-values (black) and pseudo R-squared (R1) values (gray) as a function of τ.
Figure 5Linear regression of xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and LA/SA. Values of the Cramer–Prentice Alpha (α) index (R2 = 0.34, P < 0.05) are superimposed.