Literature DB >> 25858883

Met Expectations and Satisfaction with Duration: A Patient-Centered Evaluation of Breastfeeding Outcomes in the Infant Feeding Practices Study II.

Emily F Gregory1, Arlene M Butz2, Sharon R Ghazarian3, Susan M Gross4, Sara B Johnson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding expectations predict breastfeeding duration. The extent to which expectations for duration are met remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospective measures of expected breastfeeding duration, changes in expectations over time, and factors associated with meeting expectations.
METHODS: The Infant Feeding Practices Study II followed women from late pregnancy to 1 year postpartum. Expected breastfeeding duration was assessed 5 times. Logistic regression identified factors associated with met prenatal expectations. Subgroup analysis compared met prenatal expectations to satisfaction with breastfeeding duration.
RESULTS: One-year postpartum, 34.7% of 1802 participants had met prenatal expected breastfeeding duration, and 23.9% were still breastfeeding. Fifty-eight percent of women met expectations stated at 7 months postpartum. Modifiable risk factors associated with meeting prenatal expectations included early regular breast pump use (odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.07). Return to work was negatively associated with met expectations (return by 6 weeks postpartum: OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.71; later return: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). Among those who reported on satisfaction with duration (n = 1226), 40.4% were satisfied. Satisfaction was associated with meeting expectations (OR, 10.56; 95% CI, 7.67-14.55), but expectation and satisfaction measures were not equivalent. Elevated body mass index and depressive symptoms at 2 months postpartum were negatively associated with both measures.
CONCLUSION: Most participants did not meet prenatal or postnatal expectations for breastfeeding duration and were unsatisfied with duration. However, at 12 months, more participants felt they had met their expectations and were satisfied with their breastfeeding duration than were actually breastfeeding. Therefore, women may perceive greater breastfeeding progress than suggested by Healthy People 2020 benchmarks.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breastfeeding; patient-centered outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25858883     DOI: 10.1177/0890334415579655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Lact        ISSN: 0890-3344            Impact factor:   2.219


  3 in total

1.  Are Low-Income, Diverse Mothers Able to Meet Breastfeeding Intentions After 2 Months of Breastfeeding?

Authors:  Melissa C Kay; Rushina Cholera; Kori B Flower; H Shonna Yin; Russell L Rothman; Lee M Sanders; Alan M Delamater; Eliana M Perrin
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Changes in mothers' intended duration of breastfeeding from the prenatal to neonatal periods.

Authors:  Jennifer M Nelson; Ruowei Li; Cria G Perrine; Kelley S Scanlon
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.081

3.  Breastfeeding self-efficacy as a dominant factor affecting maternal breastfeeding satisfaction.

Authors:  Siti Nurbayanti Awaliyah; Imami Nur Rachmawati; Hayuni Rahmah
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2019-08-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.