| Literature DB >> 25858777 |
Véronique Bissonnette-Maheux1, Veronique Provencher, Annie Lapointe, Marilyn Dugrenier, Audrée-Anne Dumas, Pierre Pluye, Sharon Straus, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Sophie Desroches.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death (63%) worldwide. A key behavioral risk factor is unhealthy eating. New strategies must be identified and evaluated to improve dietary habits. Social media, such as blogs, represent a unique opportunity for improving knowledge translation in health care through interactive communication between health consumers and health professionals. Despite the proliferation of food and lifestyle blogs, no research has been devoted to understanding potential blog readers' perceptions of healthy eating blogs written by dietitians.Entities:
Keywords: blog; health behavior; knowledge translation; nutrition; qualitative research; social media
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25858777 PMCID: PMC4407018 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 5.428
Figure 1Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior [45].
Sociodemographic characteristics of the 33 participants.
| Characteristics | Participants | |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 44 (17) | |
|
|
| |
|
| Caucasian | 33 (100) |
|
|
| |
|
| Primary | 1 (3) |
|
| High school | 3 (9) |
|
| College | 13 (39) |
|
| University | 16 (48) |
|
|
| |
|
| 0-19,999 | 4 (12) |
|
| 20,000-49,999 | 10 (30) |
|
| 50,000-99,999 | 8 (24) |
|
| 100,000-149,999 | 4 (12) |
|
| 150,000-199,999 | 5 (15) |
|
| ≥200,000 | 0 (0) |
|
| Unknown | 2 (6) |
Internet use characteristics of the 33 participants.
| Internet characteristics | n (%) | |
|
|
| |
|
| 1-3 hours/week | 13 (39) |
|
| 3-5 hours/week | 6 (18) |
|
| 5-10 hours/week | 11 (33) |
|
| ≥10 hours/week | 3 (9) |
| Read a blog before | 25 (76) | |
| Read a blog on nutrition beforea | 16 (64) | |
| Read comments on a blog beforea | 18 (72) | |
| Commented on a blog beforea | 2 (8) | |
aOnly among participants who had already read a blog before (n=25).
Figure 2Information sources for information on health, nutrition, and recipes.
Salient beliefs associated with the use of a healthy eating blog.
| Salient beliefs | Frequency of groups, n | Frequency of mentions by age (years), n | |||
|
|
| 18-34 | 35-54 | 55-75 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Gives recipe ideas | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Helps improve diet-related lifestyle | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
|
| Promotes interaction with the dietitian | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| Interesting to have the opinion of fellow blog readers | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Introduces to new foods | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
|
| Introduces to new trends in nutrition | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Allows to learn more about nutrition in general | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Credible information | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
|
| Allows to have the opinion of a dietitian | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Opinion of only 1 blogger (if only 1 blogger is followed) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Increases time spent on the Internet | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| Nonrelevant comments from blog readers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| Feeling of guilt if one does not follow dietary advice given on the blog | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Family | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
| Colleagues | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Friends | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Physicians | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
|
| Neighbors | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Family | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Physicians | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
|
| Friends | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| Colleagues | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Visually attractive blog | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
| Email to inform of a newly published posts | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
|
| New information weekly (updated weekly) | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
|
| Well-designed for quick access to desired information | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
|
| Interesting and entertaining posts | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Quick access to the blog | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
|
| Well written, concise info | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Written by a personality | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Notification through Facebook to inform of a newly published posts | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
| Presence of recipes | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Contains complete information | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Popular blog, referred by someone | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Text well-structured in paragraphs with subtitles | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Availability of nutritional value of the recipes | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| Opportunity to read other readers’ comments and to link with them | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| Possibility to ask questions, interactivity | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Easy to understand, not too scientific | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Narrative approach | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Posts about novel foods, trends | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Posts too long to read | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
|
| Presence of advertising | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
|
| Smaller font size | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Conflict of interests, promotion of commercial products by blogger | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Lack of new information, too repetitive | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
|
| Lack of time | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
|
| Poorly structured, complicated site | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Notifications too frequent | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| More negative than positive posts | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Visually unattractive | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
|
| Computer issues (eg, slow) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| Information not available, not accessible | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Credibility: can be written by anyone, not always true | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| If it is not professional, poor writing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |