Karen M Tabb1, Shinwoo Choi2, Maria Pineros-Leano2, Brandon Meline3, Hellen G McDonald2, Rachel Kester4, Hsiang Huang4. 1. School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Electronic address: ktabb@illinois.edu. 2. School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. 3. Champaign-Urbana Public Health District, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Best practices for addressing women's mental health and screening for depression in public health clinics are not available. Clinic staff are often responsible for screening for depression; however, few studies examine staff perceptions on feasibility and acceptability of using perinatal screening for mood disorders in ethnically diverse public health clinics. METHODS: During December 2012, we conducted four focus groups using a semistructured interview guide with public health clinic staff of varying disciplines (n=25) in a Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. All interviews were audio recorded and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We found five descriptive themes related to acceptability and feasibility of screening for perinatal depression in a public health clinic. The main themes include (1) literacy barriers, (2) need for referrals and follow-up with outside services, (3) training and capacity needs, (4) stigma of depression, and (5) location and privacy of screening. Although multiple barriers to universal depression screening in a public health clinic were identified, participants found value in practice of screening low-income women for depression. CONCLUSION: Factors for facilitating implementation of systematic depression screening in a public health clinic have been identified. Implications discuss how policy makers and public health clinic administrators can improve the universal depression screening process.
OBJECTIVE: Best practices for addressing women's mental health and screening for depression in public health clinics are not available. Clinic staff are often responsible for screening for depression; however, few studies examine staff perceptions on feasibility and acceptability of using perinatal screening for mood disorders in ethnically diverse public health clinics. METHODS: During December 2012, we conducted four focus groups using a semistructured interview guide with public health clinic staff of varying disciplines (n=25) in a Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. All interviews were audio recorded and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We found five descriptive themes related to acceptability and feasibility of screening for perinatal depression in a public health clinic. The main themes include (1) literacy barriers, (2) need for referrals and follow-up with outside services, (3) training and capacity needs, (4) stigma of depression, and (5) location and privacy of screening. Although multiple barriers to universal depression screening in a public health clinic were identified, participants found value in practice of screening low-income women for depression. CONCLUSION: Factors for facilitating implementation of systematic depression screening in a public health clinic have been identified. Implications discuss how policy makers and public health clinic administrators can improve the universal depression screening process.
Authors: Yukiko Washio; Elizabeth Novack Wright; Dalmacio Flores; Annet Davis; Jesse Chittams; Claire Anagnostopulos; Linda M Kilby; Anne M Teitelman Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2017-10
Authors: José S Marcano-Belisario; Ajay K Gupta; John O'Donoghue; Paul Ramchandani; Cecily Morrison; Josip Car Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Hilary K Brown; Andrew S Wilton; Joel G Ray; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Astrid Guttmann; Simone N Vigod Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Amritha Bhat; Arjun Nanda; Lauren Murphy; Andrea L Ball; John Fortney; Jodie Katon Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2021-07-11 Impact factor: 3.633