| Literature DB >> 25858307 |
Philip L Russo1, Allen C Cheng2, Michael Richards3, Nicholas Graves4, Lisa Hall4.
Abstract
In the absence of a national health care-associated infection surveillance program in Australia, differences between existing state-based programs were explored using an online survey. Only 51% of respondents who undertake surveillance have been trained, fewer than half perform surgical site infection surveillance prospectively, and only 41% indicated they risk adjust surgical site infection data. Widespread variation of surveillance methods highlights future challenges when considering the development and implementation of a national program in Australia.Entities:
Keywords: Data quality; Definitions; Method; Prospective
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25858307 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Infect Control ISSN: 0196-6553 Impact factor: 2.918