Literature DB >> 25858123

Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn't mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials.

L A Harvey1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25858123     DOI： 10.1038/sc.2015.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN： 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  The effectiveness of physical interventions for people with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review.

Authors:  L A Harvey; C-Wc Lin; J V Glinsky; A De Wolf
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Lucia Ruhland; Ian Casson; Susan MacDonald; Dianne Delva; Richard Birtwhistle; Miu Lam; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Response to 'Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn't mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials'.

Authors:  A Wernig
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.772
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.