| Literature DB >> 25858115 |
Nyawira E Njiiri1, B Mark deC Bronsvoort2, Nicola E Collins3, Helena C Steyn4, Milana Troskie3, Ilse Vorster3, S M Thumbi5, Kgomotso P Sibeko3, Amy Jennings6, Ilana Conradie van Wyk3, Mary Mbole-Kariuki7, Henry Kiara8, E Jane Poole8, Olivier Hanotte9, Koos Coetzer3, Marinda C Oosthuizen3, Mark Woolhouse10, Philip Toye11.
Abstract
The development of sensitive surveillance technologies using PCR-based detection of microbial DNA, such as the reverse line blot assay, can facilitate the gathering of epidemiological information on tick-borne diseases, which continue to hamper the productivity of livestock in many parts of Africa and elsewhere. We have employed a reverse line blot assay to detect the prevalence of tick-borne parasites in an intensively studied cohort of indigenous calves in western Kenya. The calves were recruited close to birth and monitored for the presence of infectious disease for up to 51 weeks. The final visit samples from 453 calves which survived for the study period were analyzed by RLB. The results indicated high prevalences of Theileria mutans (71.6%), T. velifera (62.8%), Anaplasma sp. Omatjenne (42.7%), A. bovis (39.9%), Theileria sp. (sable) (32.7%), T. parva (12.9%) and T. taurotragi (8.5%), with minor occurrences of eight other haemoparasites. The unexpectedly low prevalence of the pathogenic species Ehrlichia ruminantium was confirmed by a species-specific PCR targeting the pCS20 gene region. Coinfection analyses of the seven most prevalent haemoparasites indicated that they were present as coinfections in over 90% of the cases. The analyses revealed significant associations between several of the Theileria parasites, in particular T. velifera with Theileria sp. sable and T. mutans, and T. parva with T. taurotragi. There was very little coinfection of the two most common Anaplasma species, although they were commonly detected as coinfections with the Theileria parasites. The comparison of reverse line blot and serological results for four haemoparasites (T. parva, T. mutans, A. marginale and B. bigemina) indicated that, except for the mostly benign T. mutans, indigenous cattle seem capable of clearing infections of the three other, pathogenic parasites to below detectable levels. Although the study site was located across four agroecological zones, there was little restriction of the parasites to particular zones.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma; Cattle; Coinfection; Haemoparasites; Reverse line blot; Theileria
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25858115 PMCID: PMC4427107 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Parasitol ISSN: 0304-4017 Impact factor: 2.738
Fig. 1Map of western Kenya showing the study site and AEZs (Bronsvoort et al., 2013).
Genus- and species-specific RLB oligonucleotide probes that were used in this study.
| Pathogen | Sequence (5′ → 3′) |
|---|---|
| GGG GGA AAG ATT TAT CGC TA | |
| GTA GCT TGC TAT GRG AAC A | |
| TCG AAC GGA CCA TAC GC | |
| GAC CGT ATA CGC AGC TTG | |
| TTG CTA TAA AGA ATA ATT AGT GG | |
| CGG ATT TTT ATC ATA GCT TGC | |
| TCT GGC TAT AGG AAA TTG TTA | |
| ACC TTT TGG TTA TAA ATA ATT GTT | |
| AGT ATC TGT TAG TGG CAG | |
| TAA TGG TTA ATA GGA RCR GTT G | |
| ATT AGA GTG TTT CAA GCA GAC | |
| ACT AGA GTG TTT CAA ACA GGC | |
| TTG GTA AAT CGC CTT GGT C | |
| CGT TTT TTC CCT TTT GTT GG | |
| CAG GTT TCG CCT GTA TAA TTG AG | |
| GTG TTT ATC GCA GAC TTT TGT | |
| TGC GTT GAC CGT TTG AC | |
| ACT RAT GTC GAG ATT GCA C | |
| TTA TGC GTT TTC CGA CTG GC | |
| TAC TTG CCT TGT CTG GTT T | |
| CAT CCC TCT GGT TAA TTT G | |
| ATC TTG TTG CTT GCA GCT T | |
| TCC GAC TTT GGT TGG TGT | |
| GRC TTG GCA TCW TCT GGA | |
| CGG TTT GTT GCC TTT GTG | |
| AGC GTG TTC GAG TTT GCC | |
| ATT AGA GTG CTC AAA GCA GGC | |
| CCG AAC GTA ATT TTA TTG ATT TG | |
| CCT CTG GGG TCT GTG CA | |
| GCG TTG TGG CTT TTT TCT G | |
| GGC TTA TTT CGG WTT GAT TTT | |
| TTC GTT GAC TGC GYT TGG | |
| CTT GTG TCC CTC CGG G | |
| CTT GCG TCT CCG AAT GTT | |
| TTT TGC TCC TTT ACG AGT CTT TGC | |
| GGA CGG AGT TCG CTT TG | |
| CAG ACG GAG TTT ACT TTG T | |
| CTG CAT TGT TTC TTT CCT TTG | |
| GCT GCA TTG CCT TTT CTC C | |
| TCT TGG CAC GTG GCT TTT | |
| CCT ATT CTC CTT TAC GAG T |
The degenerate position R denotes either A or G, W denotes either A or T and Y denotes either C or T.
The prevalence of haemoparasites in cattle blood samples from western Kenya as determined by the RLB assay.
| Species | Total | Raw prevalence | Adjusted prevalence | 95% CI | LR test for clustering by SL ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 313 | 0.691 | 0.716 | 0.671–0.760 | 0.144 | |
| 286 | 0.631 | 0.628 | 0.556–0.700 | 0.617 | |
| 187 | 0.413 | 0.427 | 0.361–0.500 | 0.025 | |
| 172 | 0.380 | 0.399 | 0.367–0.430 | 0.078 | |
| 138 | 0.305 | 0.327 | 0.240–0.430 | <0.001 | |
| 55 | 0.121 | 0.129 | 0.099–0.170 | 0.325 | |
| 33 | 0.073 | 0.085 | 0.056–0.130 | 0.008 | |
| 14 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 0.018–0.060 | 0.023 | |
| 10 | 0.022 | 0.035 | 0.013–0.090 | 0.103 | |
| 6 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.005–0.030 | 0.419 | |
| 2 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.002–0.020 | 0.964 | |
| 2 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.001–0.030 | 0.909 | |
| 2 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.001–0.010 | 0.978 | |
| 1 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.000–0.020 | 0.997 | |
| 1 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.000–0.010 | 0.999 | |
| A/E catch-all | 65 | ||||
| T & B catch-alls | 10 |
The ‘catch-all’ results are those for which a positive signal was obtained for with the generic probes but not with a species-specific probe.
Pearson's correlation coefficient for the seven most prevalent species observed (p value).
| 1.0000 | 0.000 (1.000) | 0.159 (<0.001) | 0.030 (0.531) | 0.144 (0.002) | 0.061 (0.197) | 0.098 (0.037) | |
| 1.0000 | 0.231 (<0.001) | 0.073 (0.122) | 0.127 (0.007) | 0.041 (0.384) | 0.176 (<0.001) | ||
| 1.0000 | 0.117 (0.013) | 0.308 (<0.001) | 0.096 (0.042) | 0.420 (<0.001) | |||
| 1.0000 | −0.099 (0.035) | 0.312 (<0.001) | −0.122 (0.009) | ||||
| 1.0000 | −0.038 (0.421) | 0.506 (<0.001) | |||||
| 1.0000 | −0.156 (<0.001) | ||||||
| 1.0000 |
Co-infection analysis of the seven most prevalent haemoparasites in cattle blood samples from western Kenya, as determined by the RLB assay.
| Species | Total (no.) | Single (%) | A only (%) | T only (%) | A and T (%) | Total mixed (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 187 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 56.1 | 35.3 | 94.1 | |
| 172 | 7.6 | 2.9 | 51.2 | 38.4 | 92.4 | |
| 313 | 4.2 | 9.6 | 22.7 | 63.6 | 95.8 | |
| 286 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 24.1 | 65.7 | 95.5 | |
| 138 | 0 | 0 | 21.0 | 79.0 | 100 | |
| 55 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 27.3 | 65.5 | 96.4 | |
| 33 | 0 | 0 | 24.2 | 75.8 | 100 |
Fig. 2The prevalences of the most common haemoparasites detected by RLB in the different AEZs in the study region.