Literature DB >> 25857518

Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses--a simulation study.

B O Fragomeni1, D A L Lourenco1, S Tsuruta1, Y Masuda1, I Aguilar2, I Misztal1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine accuracy of genomic selection via single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) when the direct inverse of the genomic relationship matrix (G) is replaced by an approximation of G(-1) based on recursions for young genotyped animals conditioned on a subset of proven animals, termed algorithm for proven and young animals (APY). With the efficient implementation, this algorithm has a cubic cost with proven animals and linear with young animals. Ten duplicate data sets mimicking a dairy cattle population were simulated. In a first scenario, genomic information for 20k genotyped bulls, divided in 7k proven and 13k young bulls, was generated for each replicate. In a second scenario, 5k genotyped cows with phenotypes were included in the analysis as young animals. Accuracies (average for the 10 replicates) in regular EBV were 0.72 and 0.34 for proven and young animals, respectively. When genomic information was included, they increased to 0.75 and 0.50. No differences between genomic EBV (GEBV) obtained with the regular G(-1) and the approximated G(-1) via the recursive method were observed. In the second scenario, accuracies in GEBV (0.76, 0.51 and 0.59 for proven bulls, young males and young females, respectively) were also higher than those in EBV (0.72, 0.35 and 0.49). Again, no differences between GEBV with regular G(-1) and with recursions were observed. With the recursive algorithm, the number of iterations to achieve convergence was reduced from 227 to 206 in the first scenario and from 232 to 209 in the second scenario. Cows can be treated as young animals in APY without reducing the accuracy. The proposed algorithm can be implemented to reduce computing costs and to overcome current limitations on the number of genotyped animals in the ssGBLUP method.
© 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic evaluation; genomic selection; single-step method

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25857518     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  5 in total

1.  The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan; Michael Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs.

Authors:  Tage Ostersen; Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Mark Henryon
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Increasing accuracy of genomic selection in presence of high density marker panels through the prioritization of relevant polymorphisms.

Authors:  Ling-Yun Chang; Sajjad Toghiani; Samuel E Aggrey; Romdhane Rekaya
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Single-Step GBLUP and GWAS Analyses Suggests Implementation of Unweighted Two Trait Approach for Heat Stress in Swine.

Authors:  Gabriella Roby Dodd; Kent Gray; Yijian Huang; Breno Fragomeni
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A comprehensive study on size and definition of the core group in the proven and young algorithm for single-step GBLUP.

Authors:  Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi; Daniela Lourenco; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.