Literature DB >> 25857283

Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Versus Distraction Osteogenesis for Advancement of the Retrognathic Mandible.

Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi1, Edward Ellis2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to identify significant differences in skeletal stability and neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) between bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and distraction osteogenesis (DO) for mandibular advancement surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic and electronic search of several databases using specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search through November 2014. The inclusion criteria were clinical human studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and retrospective studies, with the aim of comparing BSSO and DO (predictor variables) after mandibular advancement surgery with regard to skeletal stability and NSD of the IAN (outcome variables). Both linear and angular measurements of the horizontal and vertical positions of the mandible were analyzed. For binary outcomes, we calculated a standard estimation of the risk ratio using the random-effects model if heterogeneity was detected; otherwise, a fixed effects model, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was used. Weighted mean differences or standard mean differences were used to construct forest plots of continuous data. In addition, the number needed to treat, with the 95% CIs, was calculated for NSD of the IAN.
RESULTS: Our initial PubMed search identified 215 studies, of which 9 met our inclusion criteria-3 RCTs, 1 CCT, and 5 retrospective studies. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups regarding skeletal stability in either the vertical (P = .34) or horizontal (P = .88) direction. A statistically significant difference was found between BSSO and DO with regard to NSD of IAN function (P = .004).
CONCLUSION: The results of the present meta-analysis have shown that DO significantly reduced the incidence of NSD of the IAN after lengthening of the retrognathic mandible compared with the BBSO.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25857283     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Skeletal Stability after Large Mandibular Advancement (> 10 mm) with Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Skeletal Elastic Intermaxillary Fixation.

Authors:  Kristoffer Schwartz; Maria Rodrigo-Domingo; Thomas Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Micrognathia with temporomandibular joint ankylosis and obstructive sleep apnea treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis using skeletal anchorage: a case report.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tomonari; Hiroko Takada; Tomofumi Hamada; Sangho Kwon; Tsuyoshi Sugiura; Shouichi Miyawaki
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Balcony genioplasty: a novel technique for better esthetic results in patients with deep mentolabial fold.

Authors:  Seied Omid Keyhan; Behzad Cheshmi; Hamid Reza Fallahi; Mohammad Ali Asayesh; Tirbod Fattahi
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02-11

4.  Efficacy and Versatility of Intraoral Monoplanar Distractors in the Correction of Extreme Mandibular Deformities and Severe Facial Asymmetries - A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-23

5.  Two-Axis Continuous Distractor for Mandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Milad Etemadi Sh; Javad Alizargar; Venous Behdadipour; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.