Literature DB >> 2585650

The value of silent myocardial ischemia monitoring in the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery.

P F Pasternack1, E A Grossi, F G Baumann, T S Riles, P J Lamparello, G Giangola, L K Primis, R Mintzer, A M Imparato.   

Abstract

Real-time electrocardiographic monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia was performed on 200 patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery to try to better define those at high risk of perioperative myocardial infarction. The patients were divided into those undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm or lower extremity revascularization procedures (group I, n = 120) and those undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy (group II, n = 80). Silent ischemia was detected during the preoperative, intraoperative, or post-operative periods in 60.8% of group I and 67.5% of group II patients. Six group I and three group II patients suffered an acute perioperative myocardial infarction with two cardiac deaths. In both groups I and II a variety of parameters based on monitoring of silent myocardial ischemia were compared between the subgroups of patients who had myocardial infarction and those who did not. The results show that in both groups there was a significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) greater total duration of perioperative ischemic time, total number of perioperative ischemic episodes, and total duration of perioperative ischemic time as a percent of total monitoring time in patients who suffered a perioperative myocardial infarction compared to those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of preoperative characteristics in all 200 patients showed the occurrence of preoperative silent myocardial ischemia and angina at rest to be the only significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. Thus perioperative monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia might noninvasively identify those patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery who are at increased risk for perioperative myocardial infarction, permitting implementation of timely preventive measures in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2585650     DOI: 10.1067/mva.1989.15572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  14 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative care of the vascular surgery patient: the perspective of the internist.

Authors:  R Granieri; D S Macpherson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Preoperative evaluation of the cardiac patient for noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  P G Barash
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Intraoperative automated ST segment analysis: a reliable 'black box'?

Authors:  H Yang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Selective evaluation and management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A 16-year experience.

Authors:  M A Golden; A D Whittemore; M C Donaldson; J A Mannick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A meta-analysis comparing the prognostic accuracy of six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

Authors:  M D Kertai; E Boersma; J J Bax; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; G J L'talien; J R T C Roelandt; H van Urk; D Poldermans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Failure of negative dipyridamole thallium scans to predict perioperative myocardial ischaemia and infarction.

Authors:  L A Fleisher; A H Nelson; S H Rosenbaum
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Perioperative ischaemia in aortic surgery: combined epidural/general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia vs general anaesthesia and i.v. analgesia.

Authors:  R L Garnett; A MacIntyre; P Lindsay; G G Barber; C W Cole; G Hajjar; N V McPhail; T D Ruddy; R Stark; D Boisvert
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Haemodynamic instability and myocardial ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of propofol and isoflurane.

Authors:  W A Mutch; I W White; N Donen; I R Thomson; M Rosenbloom; M Cheang; M West
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  [Premedication visits. Economizing at the cost of the patient?].

Authors:  C D Kratz; M Christ; B Maisch; K M Kerwat; C Olt; A Zielke; A Hellinger; H Wulf; G Geldner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Cardiac damage after carotid intervention: a meta-analysis after a decade of randomized trials.

Authors:  George Galyfos; Fragiska Sigala; Evridiki Karanikola; Chrisoula Loizou; Konstantinos Toutouzas; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.