Literature DB >> 25856313

Bioinformatic identification and expression analysis of banana microRNAs and their targets.

Juan Chai1, Renjun Feng1, Hourui Shi2, Mengyun Ren2, Yindong Zhang3, Jingyi Wang1.   

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) represent a class of endogenous non-coding small RNAs that play important roles in multiple biological processes by degrading targeted mRNAs or repressing mRNA translation. Thousands of miRNAs have been identified in many plant species, whereas only a limited number of miRNAs have been predicted in M. acuminata (A genome) and M. balbisiana (B genome). Here, previously known plant miRNAs were BLASTed against the Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) and Genomic Survey Sequence (GSS), a database of banana genes. A total of 32 potential miRNAs belonging to 13 miRNAs families were detected using a range of filtering criteria. 244 miRNA:target pairs were subsequently predicted, most of which encode transcription factors or enzymes that participate in the regulation of development, growth, metabolism, and other physiological processes. In order to validate the predicted miRNAs and the mutual relationship between miRNAs and their target genes, qRT-PCR was applied to detect the tissue-specific expression levels of 12 putative miRNAs and 6 target genes in roots, leaves, flowers, and fruits. This study provides some important information about banana pre-miRNAs, mature miRNAs, and miRNA target genes and these findings can be applied to future research of miRNA functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25856313      PMCID: PMC4391839          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous non-coding RNA molecules that are 21–24 nucleotides (nt) in length. The processing and maturation of miRNAs in plants involves several steps that employ key enzymes, such as Dicer-like 1 (DCL1) [1] and HASTY [2,3]. Mature miRNAs are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression by targeting mRNA degradation or translation repression [4-6]. Previous research has shown that miRNAs play a key role in various metabolic and biological processes in plants, including meristem cell identity, leaf morphogenesis and polarity, floral differentiation and development, hormone signaling, organ separation, fruit growth and development, and the stress responses [7]. A number of methods have been applied to miRNA prediction, including genetic screening, direct cloning, sequencing methods, and computational approaches. Compared to these methods, the computational approach is one of the most effective, rapid, and affordable strategies to identify miRNAs [8] based on the major characteristic features of miRNAs, such as the hairpin-shaped stem-loop secondary structure with minimal folding free energy and high evolutionary conservation between species [9-11]. Using bioinformatics analysis based on comparative genome-based homolog searching, expressed sequence tag (EST) and/or genomic survey sequence (GSS), many researchers have identified miRNA genes from a variety of species, including Arabidopsis thaliana [12], Oryza sativa [13], Triticum aestivum [14], Zea mays [15], Hordeum vulgare [16], Sorghum bicolor [17], Gossypium [18], Glycine max [19], solanum tuberosum [20], Lycopersicon esculentum [21], citrus [22], Fragaria vesca [7], Malus. domestica [23], Medicago truncatula [24], Brassica napus [25], and Catharanthus roseus [26]. Bananas (Musa spp.) are giant perennial herbs from the order Zingiberales of the monocotyledon group, which originated in Southeast Asia and the western Pacific [27,28]. Cultivated bananas have evolved from the hybridization of wild species of M. acuminata and M. balbisiana [29]. These crops are of extreme importance across the world’s tropical and subtropical regions where they are vital for food security and are also a major source of incomes. Bananas are widely exported to industrialized countries where they constitute a major staple food for millions of people [27]. Bananas are the world’s most important fruit and rank fourth in the list of global food crops, with a global annual production in excess of 107 million tons [30]. Thousands of miRNAs belonging to various plant species have been registered in the miRNA database, miRBase [31] (http://www.mirbase.org), and novel miRNA genes will be identified in Release 20; however, none of these miRNAs are from Musa. Recently, a reference sequence of Musa A-genome and a draft sequence of B-genome have been published [27,32]. D’Hont et al (2012) reported 235 conserved miRNAs from 37 families using computational methods based on the‘Pahang’A-genome sequence similarity with known miRNAs in PMRD (http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/PMRD/). Only the miR528 family out of 8 poales genomes-specific miRNA families was found in the A-genome. Davey et al (2013) predicted a similar number of microRNA sequences (47 and 42 miRNA families) in both A- and B-genomes, respectively, using publically available small RNA data from M.acuminata‘Calcutta 4’leaf, flower, and fruit tissues (sequenced within the framework of a NSF project http://smallrna.udel.edu) and 235 miRNA sequences reported for A-genome [27]. Davey et al (2013) also identified 28 novel miRNAs that were unique to either Musa A- or B-genomes, whereas, they did not experimentally verify and characterize the miRNAs. In the present study, a computational analysis and a homolog search were used to identify banana miRNAs using miRBase, as well as EST and GSS data in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The potential target genes of miRNAs were identified, and the potential functions of the predicted miRNAs targets, mainly the transcription factor genes, were investigated. Using real time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), selected miRNAs and their targets were used to analyze the expression patterns in different tissues (i.e., roots, leaves, flowers, and fruits). The identification of miRNAs and their targets is important in order to understand the roles of miRNAs in the growth development and stress physiology of the banana (Musa spp.).

Materials and Methods

Plant material

Roots, leaves, flowers, and fruits were collected from banana plants (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, ‘Brazilian’) grown at the fruit science experimental station of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (19°98′N, 110°33′E; Haikou, Hainan province, China). After collection, all the samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until use.

Sequences

A total of previously known plant miRNA sequences were obtained from miRBase [31] (http://www.mirbase.org/, Release 20.0, June 2013). In order to avoid overlap of sequences, repeats within the above sequences were removed. The remaining miRNA sequences were defined as a reference to find the conserved miRNAs in banana. A total of 46,111 banana EST and 31,544 GSS were obtained from the NCBI GenBank [33] in October 2013 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). These sequences were then used to predict the miRNAs and their target genes candidates.

Prediction of miRNAs and their precursors

The prediction procedure is shown in Fig 1. First, known plant miRNAs in the miRBase were used as query sequences to blast against the downloaded ESTs and GSSs. The EST and GSS sequences that had no more than 3 mismatching nucleotides against the known miRNAs were regarded as the homologous sequences of the corresponding miRNAs, and the franking regions plus the matching nucleotide sequences were taken as the potential miRNA precursors. The repeat sequences and those coding proteins were then removed from the hit sequence using BLAST 2.2.14 (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/blast/) and BLASTX (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Analysis of secondary structure and free energy of these sequences was conducted using the web-based software Mfold 3.2 [34] (http://mfold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold/RNA-Folding-Form).
Fig 1

Flowchart of the banana miRNAs prediction procedure.

These criteria were used for screening potential miRNAs or pre-miRNAs [35,36]: (1) predicted mature miRNAs have no more than 3 nt mismatches with the known miRNAs, (2) pre-miRNA sequence can fold into an appropriate hairpin secondary structure and the mature miRNA is located in one arm of the hairpin structure, (3) the mature miRNA sequence has less than 6 mismatches with the opposite miRNA* sequence in the other arm and no loop or break in miRNA/miRNA* duplex, (4) A+U content of pre-miRNA is ranged from 30% to 70%, and (5) the predicted secondary structure must have lower minimal folding free energy (MFE≦-20 kcal/mol).

Prediction of the potential miRNA targets

Based on the newly identified potential miRNA sequences, we also predicted their potential targets using online software psRNATarget [37] (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/) with the following default parameters: maximum expectation of 3.0, length for complementarity scoring (hspsize) of 20 bp, target accessibility-allowed maximum energy to unpair the target site (UPE) of 25.0, flanking length around target site for target accessibility analysis of 17 bp in upstream and 13 bp in downstream, and range of central mismatch leading to translation inhibition of 9–11 nt.

Expression analysis of banana miRNAs and target genes

Total RNA was isolated from different tissues following the CTAB method [38] and briefly exposed to RNAase-free DNAase I. cDNAs were synthesized by M-MLV according to the manufacturer’s instruction, using the specific stem-loop primers for miRNAs or Oligo(dT)15 for their target mRNAs. The specific stem-loop primers for miRNAs are listed in Table 1. After reverse transcription, the products of each reaction were diluted 10 times to avoid potential primer interference in the qRT-PCR reactions.
Table 1

Stem-loop RT primers and PCR primers for 12 identified miRNAs.

NameSequence(5’-3’)
miR156dstem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgaggtgctctc
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggttgacagaag
miR156gstem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgaggtgctctc
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtgacagaaga
miR166bstem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagccccgagc
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggggaatgttgt
miR399astem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagcagggcaa
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtgccaaagga
miR319mstem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagagggagct
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggttggactgaa
miR160astem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagtggcatac
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtgcctggctc
miR164estem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagtgcacgtg
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtggagaagca
miR167cstem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagcagatcat
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtgaagctgcc
miR169hstem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagcaggcaag
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtagccaagga
miR162stem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagtggacgca
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggtcgataaacc
miR5538stem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgaggcagcaag
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggactgaactca
miR4995stem-loop RT-primerctcaactggtgtcgtggagtccggcaattcagttgagcccttaac
PCR primeForward: acactccagctgggaggcagtggc
miR# Universal reverse primerReverse: aactggtgtcgtggag
5S rRNAPCR primeForward: tctggtgtcctaggcgta
Reverse: attctggcgtcgagctat

#: 12 identified miRNAs.

#: 12 identified miRNAs. The qRT-PCR reactions were performed using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX) on a Mx3005P Real-Time PCR System. Briegly, 2.0 μL of diluted cDNA template was added to 12.5 μL of the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX), 0.8 μM of each primer and ddH2O to a final volume of 25 μL. The reactions were amplified for 3 m at 95°C, followed by 35 or 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 50°C for 30 s. A melting curve analysis was performed to determine the specificity of the products. Reactions were done in triplicate and the controls with no template and no reverse transcription were included for each gene. The banana 5S rRNA was used as an internal control. The forward and reverse primers used in real-time PCR are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 2

Target gene primers used for qRT-PCR.

Target geneSequence(5’-3’)
SPL 16 (GSMUA_Achr9T01380_001)Forward: AAGTGCTTGGTGTATCCTC
Reverse: GGCGTCGTCTTGTATGAA
SRPK4 (GSMUA_Achr8T04590_001)Forward: AACCTTCTCACACTCATCAA
Reverse: CACTGCCACCACAATCAT
WRKY19 (GSMUA_Achr8T27870_001)Forward: GCTGACCAATGATGATGAAG
Reverse: GTGTCGTGAATGTGTAACTC
GAMYB (GSMUA_Achr1T17150_001)Forward: CATCAGTGGCAGTTCATTAG
Reverse: TGGTGGTTCAGAAGGTAGA
DFR(GSMUA_Achr8T24070_001)Forward: CCTGATGTAGTTGTTGATGAG
Reverse: AGTATCTTCCTGATGCTGAG
F-box (GSMUA_Achr6T16010_001)Forward: TTCTCCTCCTCTCCAAGTC
Reverse: ACATCTCCTCCGCATTCT
The relative expression quantification was calculated using the equation 2−ΔΔCt, where ΔΔCt = (CtmiRNA—Ct5S rRNA)Tissue X—(CtmiRNA—Ct5S rRNA)Tissue 1[39]. In this study, tissue 1 presents the expression level of each miRNA in leaves, and the expression levels in root, flower and fruit tissues were quantified relative to this value. The whole assay was repeated three times in order to ensure the reliability of the assay data. The standard deviations of the data were obtained from three independent experiments. The 6 relative targets expression levels were also quantified using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Results

Computational identification of banana miRNAs

The conservation of miRNA families among various plant species has facilitated the prediction of conserved miRNAs by EST and/or GSS analysis in various plants [36]. Using this method, we identified 32 conserved miRNAs derived from 16 EST and 16 GSS sequences, belonging to 13 miRNA families (Table 3). Eight and four predicted miRNA members belonged to the families of miR156/157 and miR166, respectively, while three members belonged to the family of, miR159/319, miR160, and miR162, respectively. The remaining miRNA families had no more than two members; among them, 28 miRNAs (87.5%) were derived from M. acuminata (AA and AAA) and 4 miRNAs (miR159, miR397, miR399a*, and miR399a) were derived from Musa ABB group; miR4995 and miR5538 are the new families in banana that have not been reported previously (Table 3).
Table 3

List of computer predicted banana miRNAs from the EST and GSS database.

FamilyNew miRNAMature sequence (5’-3’)EST/GSSLocationLMLPMFEsA+U (%)
miR156/157mac-miR156GUUGACAGAAGAUAGAAGAGCACEST /JK5383795’22112-52.6050.0
mac-miR156a-5pUGACAGAAGAGAGUGAGCACEST /ES4348365’2094-52.245.74
mac-miR156a-3pGCUCACUUCUCUUCCUGUCAGC EST /ES4348363’2294-52.245.74
mac-miR156dUUGACAGAAGAUAGAGAGCACEST /JK5383795’21112-52.6050.0
mac-miR156gUGACAGAAGAUAGAGAGCACGSS/HN2420635’20140-68.8049.29
mac-miR156h-3pGCUCACUUCUCUUCCUGUCAGCEST/ES4348363’2294-52.2045.74
mac-miR157b-5pUUGACAGAAGAUAGAGAGCACGSS/HN2420635’21140-68.8049.29
mac-miR157b*GCUCUCUAUGCUUCUGUCAUCAGSS/HN2420633’22140-68.8049.29
miR159/319mbg-miR159UUUGGAUUGAAGGGAGCUCUAEST/FL6612843’21129-36.5052.71
mac-miR319cUUGGACUGAAGGGAGCUCCCGSS/HN2445865’20108-20.156.48
mac-miR319mUUGGACUGAAGGGAGCUCCCU GSS/HN2445865’21108-20.156.48
miR160mac-miR160aUGCCUGGCUCCCUGUAUGCCAEST/JK5380873’2193-20.950.54
mac-miR160g-5pUGCCUGGCUCCCUGUAUGCCAGSS/HN248011521114-49.3047.37
mac-miR160g*GCGUGCAAGGAGCCAAGCAUGGSS/HN2480113’21114-49.3047.37
miR162mac-miR162UCGAUAAACCGCUGCGUCCAGSS/HN2475043’20144-53.4050.69
mac-miR162*GGAUGCAGAGGUUUAUCGACCGSS/HN2475043’21144-53.4050.69
mac-miR162bUCGAUAAACCGCUGCGUCCAGGSS/HN2475043’21144-53.4050.69
miR164mac-miR164eUGGAGAAGCAGGGCACGUGCA GSS/HN2466715’21176-68.049.43
miR166mac-miR166UCGGACCAGGCUUCAUUCCCCCEST/FF5587323’2285-43.143.53
mac-miR166bGGAAUGUUGUCUGGCUCGGGGEST/FF5587325’2185-43.143.53
mac-miR166c-5pGGAAUGUUGUCUGGCUCGAGGEST/FF5587325’2185-43.143.53
mac-miR166c-3pUCGGACCAGGCUUCAUUCCCCEST/FF5587323’2185-43.143.53
miR167mac-miR167cUGAAGCUGCCAGCAUGAUCUGGSS/HN2501083’21149-31.7056.38
mac-miR167dUGAAGCUGCCAGCAUGAUCUGG GSS/HN2501083’22149-31.7056.38
miR169mac-miR169hUAGCCAAGGAUGACUUGCCUGEST/JK5395565’21103-52.244.66
miR172mac-miR172bUGAAUCUUAAUGAUGCUACAGSS/HN2392013’20123-42.8056.91
mac-miR172cUGAAUCUUAAUGAUGCUACACGSS/HN2392013’21123-42.8056.91
miR397mbg-miR397aUCAUUGAGUGCAGCGUUGAUGEST/FL6666155’21125-58.5049.60
miR399mbg-miR399aGUGCAGUUCUCCUCUUGGCAAEST/FL6664595’2192-48.645.65
mbg-miR399a*UGCCAAAGGAGAAUUGCCCUGEST/FL6664593’2192-48.645.65
miR4995mac-miR4995AGGCAGUGGCUUGGUUAAGGGEST/DN2382083’2177-21.8044.16
miR5538mac-miR5538ACUGAACUCAAUCACUUGCUGCGSS/DX4576393’22131-19.158.78

Note: mac:Musa acuminata; mbg: Musa ABB Group The underlined was the mismatched bases between miRNAs and the known miRNA sequences in the miRBase; Location: the position of mature miRNA in precursor; LM: length of mature miRNA (nt); LP: length of precursor (nt); MFEs: minimal folding free energies (kcal mol−1). *: star miRNA.

Note: mac:Musa acuminata; mbg: Musa ABB Group The underlined was the mismatched bases between miRNAs and the known miRNA sequences in the miRBase; Location: the position of mature miRNA in precursor; LM: length of mature miRNA (nt); LP: length of precursor (nt); MFEs: minimal folding free energies (kcal mol−1). *: star miRNA. Though the lengths of miRNA precursors varied from 77 nt to 176 nt (Table 3), the lengths of mature miRNAs were mainly confined to 21 nucleotides (65.6% = 21/32), except five (15.6% = 5/32) (miR156a-5p, miR156g, miR319c, miR162, and miR172b) and seven (21.9% = 7/32) miRNAs (miR156, miR156a-3p, miR156h, miR157b*, miR166, miR167d, and miR5538) with 20 and 22 nucleotides, respectively. The A+U contents of the pre-miRNAs ranged from 43.53% to 58.78%, with an average of 49.32%, which met the previous criteria. Mature miRNA sequences have been reported to be evenly located on the 2 arms of the stem-loop hairpin structures of potential pre-miRNAs [40]. In our study, slightly more mature miRNAs were located in the 3′end of the pre-miRNA than were located in the 5′end (17:15). In addition, 5 pairs of miRNA/miRNA* were located at the same precursors. Among the miRNAs, 65.6% (21/32) of members begin with a 5′uracil. These results are in agreement with previous observations [19; 41,42]. All 33 miRNAs had fewer than six mismatched base pairs between the region of the mature miRNA sequences and its opposite arms. MFE is an important parameter in determining the stability of the perfect or near-perfect secondary hairpin structure of pre-miRNA, as a lower MFE value generally indicates a more stable secondary structure. In the present study, the average value of MFE was -45.3 kcal/mol with a range of -19.1 kcal/mol to -68.8 kcal/mol.

Conservation of the newly identified banana miRNAs

The miRNA families found in the miRBase are classified as conserved or unique depending on the number of species in which they have been identified. miRNA families registered in single species are considered to be unique, and those registered in two species and three or more species as moderately and highly conserved, respectively [43]. We analyzed 14 miRNAs registered in miRBase in 19 species. Multiple sequence alignment for 14 miRNAs registered in miRBase in19 species have shown in S1 File. Based on our results (Fig 2), 11 of the 13 miRNAs families are conserved within the vegetable kingdom, mainly Arabidopsis thalinana, Nicotiana tabacum, Malus domestica, Cucumis melo, Glycine max, Oryza sativa, and Zea mays, but the miR4995 and miR5538 family are exceptions. miR4995 and miR5538 show conservation with that of Glycine max and Oryza sativa respectively.
Fig 2

The statistical of the miRNAs distribution in different plants.

Digital number on behalf of the members of the family. The species names are abbreviated as following: Eu, Eudicotyledons; Mo, Monocotyledons; ath, Arabidopsis thaliana; ghr, Gossypium hirsutum; nta, Nicotiana tabacum; cme, Cucumis melo; cpa, Carica papaya; mdm, Malus domestica; csi, Citrus sinensis; ssl, Salvia sclarea; ptc, Populus trichocarpa; aqc, Aquilegia caerulea; hbr, Hevea brasiliensis; bcy, Bruguiera cylindrica; gma, Glycine max; vvi, Vitis vinifera; osa, Oryza sativa; sbi, Sorghum bicolor; sof, Saccharum officinarum; mpa, Musa paradisiaca; tae, Triticum aestivum; zma, Zea mays.

The statistical of the miRNAs distribution in different plants.

Digital number on behalf of the members of the family. The species names are abbreviated as following: Eu, Eudicotyledons; Mo, Monocotyledons; ath, Arabidopsis thaliana; ghr, Gossypium hirsutum; nta, Nicotiana tabacum; cme, Cucumis melo; cpa, Carica papaya; mdm, Malus domestica; csi, Citrus sinensis; ssl, Salvia sclarea; ptc, Populus trichocarpa; aqc, Aquilegia caerulea; hbr, Hevea brasiliensis; bcy, Bruguiera cylindrica; gma, Glycine max; vvi, Vitis vinifera; osa, Oryza sativa; sbi, Sorghum bicolor; sof, Saccharum officinarum; mpa, Musa paradisiaca; tae, Triticum aestivum; zma, Zea mays.

Prediction of banana miRNA target genes

Based on the complementarity between miRNAs and their target genes in plants, all gene-coding sequences in the banana genome database (http://banana-genome.cirad.fr/download/musa_cds.fna.gz) were used to predict banana miRNA targets by psRNATarget (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/). 244 miRNA:target pairs between 32 miRNAs and 121 mRNAs have been predicted. Table 4 shows some potential target-genes harboring binging sites for 13 conserved miRNA families. A complete list of predicted targets is depicted in S1 Table. Except for miR5538, every miRNA has more than one target. Further analysis found that most of the highly conserved miRNA families target transcription factors, such as the SBP family targeted by miR156, TCP and MYB families targeted by miR159/319, ARF family targeted by miR160, NAC family targeted by miR164, HD-Zip family targeted by miR166, and WRKY family targeted by miR399 (Table 4). In addition, other predicted target genes are involved in diverse metabolic and physiological processes, such as dehydrogenase, decarboxylase, helicase, synthase, protein kinases, oxidoreductase, binding protein, lipase, transporters, disease resistance protein, f-box proteins, zinc finger protein, heat shock protein, and laccase (Table 4).
Table 4

Putative target genes of miRNA candidates identified in banana.

miRNA familyTarget ptoteinFunction
miR156/157Squamosa promoter-binding-like proteinTranscription factor
OsSPL16—SBP-box gene family memberTranscription factor
ELMO/CED-12 family proteinSignal transduction
CTP synthase 1Metabolism
Putative Abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylase 3Metabolism/Signal transduction
RNA recognition motif containing proteinMetabolism
miR159/319Transcription factor GAMYBTranscription factor
TCP family transcription factorTranscription factor
Chorismate mutase, chloroplasticMetabolism
Putative Nuclear polyadenylated RNA-binding protein 4Transcription factor
Putative Cysteine-rich receptor-like protein kinase 15Signal transduction
miR160Auxin response factorTranscription factor
pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein At1g68930Metabolism
miR162Anthranilate synthase component I-1, chloroplasticGrowth development
Nicotianamine synthase 3Metabolism
miR164NAC domain-containing protein 21/22 (NAC21/22/NAM/CUC2)Transcription factor
UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase 1Transcriptional regulation
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1-like 1Signal transduction
disease resistance protein, putative, expressedStress responses
miR166HD-ZIPⅢTranscription factor
SRPK4Transcription factor
Putative 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, mitochondrialMetabolism
pectinacetylesterase domain containing protein, expressedMetabolism
Putative U-box domain-containing protein 33Signal transduction/protein metabolism
GDSL esterase/lipase At5g33370Metabolism
miR167Putative tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase 1Metabolism
Putative U-box domain-containing protein 52Signal transduction/protein metabolism
Cytochrome c biogenesis protein CCS1, chloroplasticMetabolism
miR169Glutamate synthase [NADH], amyloplasticMetabolism
miR172amine oxidase-relatedMetabolism
miR397LaccaseStress response
Putative pectinesterase/pectinesterase inhibitor 28Metabolism
Putative S-(hydroxymethyl)glutathione dehydrogenaseMetabolism/oxidative stress response
Putative Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4LStress response
cbbY protein-related, putative, expressedMetabolism
miR399Probable WRKY transcription factor 19Transcription factor
Putative Zinc finger protein NUTCRACKERTranscription factor
2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator, chloroplasticTransport
DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 37Metabolism
Putative Exportin-2Transport
miR4995F-box protein At2g32560Transcription factor
zinc knuckle domain containing proteinMetabolism
Bifunctional aspartokinase/homoserine dehydrogenase 1Metabolism
miR5538Dihydroflavonol-4-reductaseMetabolism

miRNAs and target confirmation by RT-qPCR

In order to examine the expression of these miRNAs, stem-loop RT-PCR were performed using a total RNA isolated from roots, leaves, flowers, and fruits. Using this approach, we were able to detect a positive signal of the expected size at 70nt (data not shown), and to confirm the presence of these miRNAs. 12 miRNAs from 11 families were chosen randomly in this experiment. All the PCR products were cloned and verified by sequencing. 12 potential miRNAs were expressed and exhibited different expression patterns in four tissues (Fig 3). The expression levels of miR164e, miR169h, and miR4995 were not significantly different among these four tissues. MiR156d, miR166b, miR399a, miR5538, miR156g, miR160a, miR162, and miR167c presented similar orders of expression in leaves, roots, flowers and fruits, having the highest expression levels in the flower tissue. When the expression levels of tested miRNAs in different tissues were compared, miR167c, miR319m, and miR164e had the highest expression level in flowers, fruits, and roots respectively (11.26, 5.62, and 2.50 folds of that in leave tissues, respectively), whereas miR399a, miR156d, and miR169h represented the lowest expression level in fruits, roots, and flowers, respectively; thus, the conserved miRNAs were expressed in a tissue-specific manner.
Fig 3

The relative expression level of selected miRNAs in leave, root, flower, and fruit of banana.

The horizontal axis indicates the 12 miRNAs, and the vertical axis indicates the relative expression.

The relative expression level of selected miRNAs in leave, root, flower, and fruit of banana.

The horizontal axis indicates the 12 miRNAs, and the vertical axis indicates the relative expression. In order to compare the expression of targets with that of the miRNAs, qRT-PCR was also used to confirm the expression of computationally predicted banana miRNA target genes in leaves, roots, flowers, and fruits; these miRNA target genes included SPL16, SRPK4, GAMYB, WRKY19, F-box, and DFR. The expression patterns of target genes in banana tissues were negatively correlated with the miRNA quantification results (Fig 4): the lowest expression levels of the miR156d, miR166b, miR399a, miR4995, and miR5538 target genes were consistent with the highest expression levels of miR156d, miR166b, miR399a, miR4995, and miR5538 in the flower tissue. The lowest expression level of the miR319 target gene was consistent with the highest expression level of miR319 in the fruit tissue. The higher expression levels of the six target genes were consistent with the lower expression of the six miRNAs in four tissues.
Fig 4

The relative expression level of selected six miRNAs (a) and their targets (b) in leave, root, flower, and fruit of banana.

The horizontal axis indicates the 6 miRNAs and their targets, and the vertical axis indicates the relative expression.

The relative expression level of selected six miRNAs (a) and their targets (b) in leave, root, flower, and fruit of banana.

The horizontal axis indicates the 6 miRNAs and their targets, and the vertical axis indicates the relative expression.

Discussion

Although miRNAs have been extensively studied for several years, no systematic study has been performed on the banana, one of the most important subtropical crops in the world. Recently, D’Hont et al (2012) and Davey et al (2013) identified 37 miRNA families and 42 miRNA families from Musa A- and B-genome, respectively, using bioinformatics analysis: those predicted miRNAs have not been confirmed by experiments for their precise sequences. Thus, banana miRNAs still remain largely unknown. Though there are a few computational approaches to identify miRNAs of plants, animals and even microorganisms, EST/GSS analysis has some advantages over other methods [19,44]. Using EST and GSS analysis, we identified 32 miRNAs belonging to 13 miRNA families. Among them, miR4995 and miR5538 are the newly found families in banana that have not previously been reported. The frequency of miRNA from ESTs and GSSs was 0.037% and 0.051%, respectively, which is little higher than the rate of 0.01% (1 in 10,000 ESTs) reported by Zhang et al (2006). 11 miRNA families identified in the study were the same as previously reported results [27,32], which have, to some extent, verified the utility of the computational predication of potential miRNAs. Several studies showed that many miRNAs are conserved across different plants [1]; however, some miRNAs are species-specific. For instance, miR5538 family is present in rice but not in Arabidopsis, suggesting that it might be restricted to monocots [45]. Cloning and sequencing validated 12 miRNAs belonging to 11 families; moreover, the ubiquitous expression of these 12 miRNAs could be detected in different banana tissues ranging from roots, leaves, flowers and fruits by qRT-PCR and some showed differential expression in different tissues. Our qRT-PCR analysis validated the miRNA prediction in banana, and their preferential expression can provide important clues about the miRNAs’ function. The prediction of miRNA target genes is important for understanding miRNA gene-regulation. Currently, bioinformatics methods based on the high homology between miRNAs and target genes are considered one of the most efficient approaches used to verify target genes, and has been employed in numerous studies [22; 46–49]. Using the newly identified miRNAs in banana as query sequences to blast against the banana genome database, we were able to predict various miRNA target genes involved in transcription, translation, stress response, structural component, development, and metabolism in the banana (Table 4). We predicted 244 miRNA:target pairs for 32 miRNAs giving an average miRNA to target ratio of 7.6 (244/32), which is greater than the ratios of 2.8 for the apple [23] and 4.1 for the castor bean [48]. Consistent with previous finding, most of these targets in the banana were plant-specific transcription factors, such as SBP, TCP, and MYB, NAC, ARF, and the HD-ZIP family, which were also predicted as targets of miR156/157, miR159/319, miR164, miR160 and miR166 in Arabidopsis [46,50], tobacco [42], citrus [22], apples [23], castor beans [48], and papayas [49]. MiR397 family targets Laccase were also conserved among plants; however, the other three miRNA families target genes that are found in a broad range of plants were not predicted to target genes with similar functions in the current banana database: miR162:DCL1 (Dicer1), miR167:ARF (auxin response factor), and miR172:AP2 (APETALA2). qRT-PCR was used to confirm the expression of potential banana miRNAs and their targets. The expression patterns between miRNAs and their targets showed a negative correlation [51,52]. In our study, the lower expression levels of the six target genes were consistent with the higher expression of the six miRNAs in four tissues, indicating that they may be actively cleaved by miRNAs (Fig 4). Squamosa promoter-binding protein-like (SPL) is the target of miR156 family. SPL genes encode plant-specific transcription factors that play important roles in fruit ripening [53], ovary and fruit development [54], grain size, shape, and quality [55], plant phase transition, plant architecture, and gibberellins signaling [56]. Our study showed that the decrease of miR156d expression may lead to increased expression of the SPL16 in roots and fruits in the banana. MiR319 plays an important role in flower organ identity and cold-induced stress [51,57]. The lowest expression level of the miR319m target gene (GAMYB) was consistent with the highest expression level of miR319m in the banana fruits. GAMYB has been demonstrated to play an important role in flower development, especially in stamen and anther development [58-60]; furthermore, GAMYB is also involved in GA-mediated programmed cell death (PCD) in the aleurone and tapetum [61]. MiR5538 showed the highest expression in flowers, and the target of miR5538, DFR (Dihydroflavonol-4-reductase), one of the key enzymes involved in flavonoids biosynthetic pathway, was expressed at the lowest level in the banana flowers. Flavonoids are involved in several biological processes including pigmentation of flowers, seed development, pollen viability, auxin transport regulation, protection against UV-B injury, defense against pathogens, and pests [62-64]; this may indicate that miR5538 has an important role in flower development and pollen viability in banana. F-box proteins, as targets for miR393/394, are reported to be differentially regulated by stress conditions and to play important roles in the abiotic stress response pathway [10,65]. In our study, miR4995 targets F-box protein (At2g32560), zinc knuckle domain containing protein, and bifunctional aspartokinase/homoserine dehydrogenase 1. The function of miR4995 is still not clear. Further studies will need to be performed in order to determine the regulation pattern of banana miRNAs and their targets.

Multiple sequence alignment for 14 miRNAs registered in miRBase in19 species.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Putative target genes of miRNA candidates identified in banana.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.
  59 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  A role for HvGAMYB in anther development.

Authors:  Fiona Murray; Roger Kalla; John Jacobsen; Frank Gubler
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Endogenous and silencing-associated small RNAs in plants.

Authors:  Cesar Llave; Kristin D Kasschau; Maggie A Rector; James C Carrington
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Computational identification of citrus microRNAs and target analysis in citrus expressed sequence tags.

Authors:  C Song; Q Jia; J Fang; F Li; C Wang; Z Zhang
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.081

5.  Computational identification of MicroRNAs in strawberry expressed sequence tags and validation of their precise sequences by miR-RACE.

Authors:  Qing-Hua Dong; Jian Han; Hua-Ping Yu; Chen Wang; Mi-Zhen Zhao; Hong Liu; An-Jing Ge; Jing-Gui Fang
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome.

Authors:  Rebecca Schwab; Javier F Palatnik; Markus Riester; Carla Schommer; Markus Schmid; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Nuclear processing and export of microRNAs in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mee Yeon Park; Gang Wu; Alfredo Gonzalez-Sulser; Hervé Vaucheret; R Scott Poethig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gibberellin modulates anther development in rice via the transcriptional regulation of GAMYB.

Authors:  Koichiro Aya; Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka; Maki Kondo; Kazuki Hamada; Kentaro Yano; Mikio Nishimura; Makoto Matsuoka
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  A computational-based update on microRNAs and their targets in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  Moreno Colaiacovo; Annalisa Subacchi; Paolo Bagnaresi; Antonella Lamontanara; Luigi Cattivelli; Primetta Faccioli
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  "A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter- and intra-specific Musa hybrids".

Authors:  Mark W Davey; Ranganath Gudimella; Jennifer Ann Harikrishna; Lee Wan Sin; Norzulaani Khalid; Johan Keulemans
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  Computational identification and comparative analysis of miRNA precursors in three palm species.

Authors:  Aline Cunha da Silva; Clícia Grativol; Flávia Thiebaut; Adriana Silva Hemerly; Paulo Cavalcanti Gomes Ferreira
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Characterization and bioinformatics analysis of ptc-miR396g-5p in response to drought stress of Paeonia ostii.

Authors:  Lili Guo; Jiajia Shen; Chenjie Zhang; Qi Guo; Haiying Liang; Xiaogai Hou
Journal:  Noncoding RNA Res       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  MiR-375 targets KLF4 and impacts the proliferation of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Qiqi Mao; Tao Quan; Bin Luo; Xuefeng Guo; Lei Liu; Qinghui Zheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-30

4.  Identification of miRNAs involved in fruit ripening in Cavendish bananas by deep sequencing.

Authors:  Fangcheng Bi; Xiangchun Meng; Chao Ma; Ganjun Yi
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  Translating the "Banana Genome" to Delineate Stress Resistance, Dwarfing, Parthenocarpy and Mechanisms of Fruit Ripening.

Authors:  Prasanta K Dash; Rhitu Rai
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Identification and co-evolution pattern of stem cell regulator miR394s and their targets among diverse plant species.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Vibhav Gautam; Pramod Kumar; Shalini Mukherjee; Swati Verma; Ananda K Sarkar
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Identification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 (Foc TR4) responsive miRNAs in banana root.

Authors:  Chunzhen Cheng; Fan Liu; Xueli Sun; Na Tian; Raphael Anue Mensah; Dan Li; Zhongxiong Lai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.